Agent skill

prepare-release

End-to-end release automation — reads commits since last tag, infers semver bump, drafts changelog, creates release PR, merges it, waits for CI green, tags, and monitors the Docker build to completion.

Stars 177
Forks 18

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator/tree/main/.claude/skills/prepare-release

SKILL.md

Prepare Release

End-to-end release workflow. Reads commits since the last release tag, infers the semver bump, drafts a user-facing changelog, confirms with you, creates a release PR, merges it, verifies CI is green, tags the release, and monitors the Docker build to completion.

Usage: /prepare-release

Run this from any branch after all feature PRs have been merged to main.


Step 1 — Ensure Clean Main

Switch to main and pull latest:

bash
git checkout main
git pull origin main
git status

If git status shows uncommitted changes, stop and resolve them before continuing. The working tree must be clean.


Step 2 — Find Last Release Tag

bash
git describe --tags --abbrev=0

Note this as LAST_TAG (e.g., v2.0.2). All commits after this tag are candidates for the release.

If this command fails (no tags exist yet), use the full history — note the first commit hash as the baseline and treat the release as the initial version.


Step 3 — Gather Commits Since Last Tag

bash
git log <LAST_TAG>...HEAD --oneline
git diff <LAST_TAG>...HEAD --stat
git diff <LAST_TAG>...HEAD --name-only

Collect the full output of each. Do not truncate.


Step 4 — Filter and Synthesize (Critical Reasoning Step)

This is not a raw dump of commit messages. Analyze the material and produce a curated, user-facing summary.

4a. Discard internal-only commits

Ignore commits that match any of the following:

  • Subject starts with: wip, WIP, checkpoint, fixup!, chore: rebase, Merge branch, version bump, release:
  • Commit only touches: build.gradle.kts, gradle/, *.properties, .gitignore, .github/, Dockerfile, docker-compose.yml, scripts/, *.md files with no API impact
  • Subject is a bare file list or CI housekeeping note

4b. Group meaningful changes by theme

Use only these categories (omit any that have no entries):

  • Breaking Changes — removed tool, renamed/removed parameter, incompatible schema change
  • New Features — new MCP tool, new operation on existing tool, new config option, new query parameter
  • Bug Fixes — incorrect behavior corrected, crash fixed, data integrity issue resolved
  • Performance — measurable throughput or latency improvement
  • Documentation — user-visible docs (only if substantive)

4c. Write 3-8 user-facing bullet points

Rules for each bullet:

  • Start with a past-tense verb (Added, Fixed, Improved, Removed, Changed)
  • Name the tool or feature affected (e.g., query_items, advance_item)
  • Describe the benefit to the user, not the implementation detail
  • Do not mention internal class names, Kotlin types, or file paths
  • Example: Added \includeAncestors` to `query_items` — eliminates parent-walk call chains for breadcrumb context`

4d. Detect plugin content changes

Check if any files under claude-plugins/ changed since the last tag:

bash
git diff <LAST_TAG>...HEAD --name-only -- claude-plugins/

If the output is non-empty, plugin content changed. Also check if any server source files (Kotlin, migrations, Gradle config) changed:

bash
git diff <LAST_TAG>...HEAD --name-only -- current/src/ current/build.gradle.kts gradle/

Classify the release type:

  • server — server source changed, no plugin changes
  • both — server source and plugin content both changed
  • plugin-only — only plugin files changed (skills, hooks, output styles), no server source

Read the current plugin version from the authoritative source — do not assume it matches any git tag. The version in the repository files may have been bumped in a previous release:

bash
cat claude-plugins/task-orchestrator/.claude-plugin/plugin.json | grep '"version"'

Determine the plugin bump level using the same semver rules as the server version, but scoped to plugin content:

Condition Plugin Bump
Breaking change to skill interface, hook behavior, or output style contract major
New skill, new hook, new output style added minor
Content fixes, wording, skill adjustments, script tweaks patch

Note the plugin bump level separately from the server bump level — they are independent. If no plugin files changed, skip plugin versioning entirely (server-only release).


Step 5 — Infer Bump Level

Plugin-only release: If the release type is plugin-only, skip the server bump entirely. The server version in version.properties stays unchanged. Only the plugin version (determined in Step 4d) is bumped. Proceed to Step 6 with the server version as-is and the plugin version as the new value.

Server or both release: Examine the synthesized changes and determine the bump level:

Condition Bump
Any breaking API change (removed tool, renamed/removed required parameter, incompatible response schema) major
New tool, new capability on existing tool, new config option, new query parameter minor
Bug fix, performance improvement, docs only, internal refactor with no API change patch

If multiple conditions apply, use the highest applicable level.

State the bump level and the one-sentence reason. Example:

Bump: minor — GitHub wiki CI sync and release automation added (new capability, no breaking change).

Calculate the proposed new version:

  • patch: increment VERSION_PATCH by 1, keep others
  • minor: increment VERSION_MINOR by 1, reset VERSION_PATCH to 0, keep VERSION_MAJOR
  • major: increment VERSION_MAJOR by 1, reset VERSION_MINOR and VERSION_PATCH to 0

Step 6 — Present for Confirmation

Output the following block and stop. Wait for the user to confirm or request changes.

## Proposed Release: vX.Y.Z  (CURRENT -> NEW)

**Release type:** <server | both | plugin-only>
**Bump level:** <major | minor | patch>
**Reason:** <one sentence>

**Plugin version:** <CURRENT -> NEW> (<bump level>) — or "No plugin changes"

### Changelog Draft

## [X.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD

### <Added | Changed | Fixed>
- <bullet 1>
- <bullet 2>
...

---

Use today's date in YYYY-MM-DD format. If the user requests changes, revise and re-present before continuing.


Step 7 — Create Release Branch

After confirmation:

bash
git checkout -b release/vX.Y.Z

Step 8 — Apply Changes

8a. Update version.properties

Plugin-only release: Skip this step — the server version stays unchanged.

Server or both release: Edit version.properties in the project root. Set only the lines that need to change. Reset lower components on a major or minor bump.

Example for a minor bump from 2.0.2 -> 2.1.0:

VERSION_MAJOR=2
VERSION_MINOR=1
VERSION_PATCH=0

8b. Update plugin version files (if plugin content changed)

Skip this step if no plugin files changed in Step 4d.

Read the current plugin version from claude-plugins/task-orchestrator/.claude-plugin/plugin.json (already retrieved in Step 4d). Calculate the new version using the plugin bump level from Step 4d.

Update both files with the new version:

  1. claude-plugins/task-orchestrator/.claude-plugin/plugin.json — update the version field
  2. .claude-plugin/marketplace.json — update plugins[name="task-orchestrator"].version

Also update the version table in claude-plugins/CLAUDE.md:

  • Find the row for task-orchestrator and replace the version number

Stage the three files (in addition to version.properties):

bash
git add claude-plugins/task-orchestrator/.claude-plugin/plugin.json \
        .claude-plugin/marketplace.json \
        claude-plugins/CLAUDE.md

8c. Insert new section into CHANGELOG.md

Read CHANGELOG.md. Find the first ## [ versioned entry (after the header). Insert the new section immediately above it, with a trailing --- separator and a blank line:

markdown
## [X.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD

### Added
- bullet 1
- bullet 2

---

## [previous version] ...

Do not modify any existing entries.

If plugin content changed (Step 4d), add under the appropriate section:

  • Bumped plugin version to X.Y.Z ()

8d. Stage, commit, and push

Plugin-only release (plugin files already staged from 8b):

bash
git add CHANGELOG.md
git status   # confirm only plugin version files + changelog are staged
git commit -m "release: bump to vX.Y.Z — plugin vA.B.C"
git push origin release/vX.Y.Z

Server-only release:

bash
git add version.properties CHANGELOG.md
git status   # confirm only expected files are staged
git commit -m "release: bump to vX.Y.Z"
git push origin release/vX.Y.Z

Both release (plugin files already staged from 8b):

bash
git add version.properties CHANGELOG.md
git status   # confirm expected files are staged
git commit -m "release: bump to vX.Y.Z"
git push origin release/vX.Y.Z

Step 9 — Pre-PR Checklist

Before creating the PR, verify these README items and fix any that are stale. If fixes are needed, add README.md to the staged files and amend the commit before pushing.

Docker image references:

bash
grep -n "ghcr.io/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator" README.md

Every Docker image reference must use :latest — never a branch name or hardcoded version tag.

Version badge (line ~7 in README):

Both /github/v/tag/ and /github/v/release/ badge endpoints work — the CI workflow creates a git tag and a GitHub release on every deploy. No change needed unless the URL is broken.


Step 10 — Create the PR

bash
gh pr create \
  --base main \
  --title "release: vX.Y.Z — <one-line summary of most significant change>" \
  --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary

- <bullet 1>
- <bullet 2>
- <bullet 3>

## Version

**Release type:** <server | both | plugin-only>
<CURRENT> -> <NEW>

Prepared with /prepare-release
EOF
)"

If the branch already has an open PR, use gh pr edit with the same title and body instead.

If the user says "show me the command" or "don't run it yet", print the full command as a code block instead of executing it.


Step 11 — Merge, Verify, Tag, and Monitor

This step automates the post-PR flow. After the PR is created, drive the release to completion rather than printing manual instructions.

11a. Print summary

Release prepared: CURRENT -> vX.Y.Z  (<bump level>)
Release type:     <server | both | plugin-only>
Branch:           release/vX.Y.Z
PR:               <URL from gh pr create>

11b. Merge the release PR

Ask the user: "Ready to merge the release PR?"

If confirmed:

bash
gh pr merge <PR-number> --squash --delete-branch

If the user prefers to merge manually (e.g., via GitHub UI), wait for them to confirm it's merged before continuing.

11c. Sync local main

bash
git checkout main
git pull origin main

Verify the pull is a fast-forward. If it's not (local main has diverged from origin), stop and investigate — this should not happen under the PR-per-feature workflow.

11d. Wait for CI to pass on main

Server or both release: CI must be green before tagging. Use /loop to monitor automatically:

/loop 2m gh run list --branch main --limit 1 --json status,conclusion,displayTitle

While monitoring, check the first result immediately:

bash
gh run list --branch main --limit 1 --json status,conclusion,displayTitle
  • If conclusion: success — proceed to 11e immediately, cancel the loop
  • If status: in_progress — wait for the loop to report completion
  • If conclusion: failurestop and fix. Do NOT tag. Report the failure to the user, investigate the cause, and merge a fix. After fixing, re-check CI before tagging. The tag must point to a green commit.

Plugin-only release: Skip CI monitoring — no server code changed, no Docker image to build. Proceed directly to the plugin-only completion in 11g.

11e. Tag and push (server or both release)

Once CI is green, cancel the monitoring loop and create the tag:

bash
git tag vX.Y.Z
git push origin vX.Y.Z

This triggers the "Build, Publish, and Release" workflow (docker-publish.yml).

11f. Monitor the Docker build

Use /loop to track the docker-publish workflow:

/loop 2m gh run list --workflow=docker-publish.yml --limit=1 --json status,conclusion,displayTitle

Check immediately:

bash
gh run list --workflow=docker-publish.yml --limit=1 --json status,conclusion,displayTitle
  • If conclusion: success — cancel the loop, proceed to 11h
  • If status: in_progress or queued — wait for the loop
  • If conclusion: failure — report the failure, investigate, and help the user resolve it. The Docker build may need a re-tag or a fix-and-retag cycle.

11g. Plugin-only completion

No tag or Docker rebuild needed — only plugin content changed. Plugin users pick up the new version when they reinstall the marketplace.

Report:

Release complete: vX.Y.Z (plugin-only)
Plugin version:   vA.B.C

Skip to 11h.

11h. Final report

Server or both release:

Release complete: vX.Y.Z
Docker image:     ghcr.io/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator:X.Y.Z (and :latest)
GitHub Release:   https://github.com/jpicklyk/task-orchestrator/releases/tag/vX.Y.Z

Cancel any remaining monitoring loops.

IMPORTANT: Do NOT use gh workflow run — the CI workflow is triggered by tag pushes (v*), not manual dispatch.


Quick Reference

Bump level When Version change
major Breaking API change X+1.0.0
minor New capability, no breaking change X.Y+1.0
patch Bug fix, docs, refactor X.Y.Z+1

Common mistakes to avoid:

  • Do not tag before CI is green on main — tagging a broken commit ships a broken Docker image
  • Do not include raw commit hashes or internal file paths in the changelog
  • Do not bump version without confirmation from the user
  • Do not stage files other than version.properties, CHANGELOG.md, plugin version files (if changed), and README.md (if fixes were needed)
  • Do not create the PR if there are no commits ahead of the last tag
  • Do not bump plugin versions outside of the release workflow

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

jpicklyk/task-orchestrator

implement

End-to-end workflow for taking MCP work items from backlog to merged PR. Handles git branching, schema-driven planning, implementation, independent review, and PR creation. Composes spec-quality, review-quality, and schema-workflow skills into a single pipeline. Use when a user says "implement this", "work on this item", "fix these bugs", "pick up the next task", "create a PR for this", "go through the backlog", or references specific MCP item IDs for implementation.

177 18
Explore
jpicklyk/task-orchestrator

review-quality

Review quality framework for the work-to-review transition gate. Guides verification of plan alignment, test quality, and code simplification before marking implementation complete. Referenced by schema guidance fields during review-phase note filling. Read this skill when filling review-checklist notes or when asked to review completed implementation work.

177 18
Explore
jpicklyk/task-orchestrator

feature-implementation

Guide the full lifecycle of a feature-implementation tagged MCP item (the feature container) — from queue through review

177 18
Explore
jpicklyk/task-orchestrator

spec-quality

Specification quality framework for planning. Defines the minimum bar for what a plan must address — alternatives, non-goals, blast radius, risk flags, and test strategy. Referenced by schema guidance fields during queue-phase note filling. Read this skill whenever filling requirements or design notes for any MCP work item.

177 18
Explore
jpicklyk/task-orchestrator

session-retrospective

Analyze the current implementation run — evaluate schema effectiveness, delegation alignment, note quality, plan-to-execution fit. Captures cross-session trends and proposes improvements when patterns repeat. Use after implementation runs, or when user says 'retrospective', 'session review', 'what did we learn', 'analyze this run', 'how did that go', 'evaluate our process', 'wrap up', 'end of session review'. Also use when the output style's retrospective nudge fires after complete_tree.

177 18
Explore
jpicklyk/task-orchestrator

quick-start

Interactive onboarding for the MCP Task Orchestrator. Detects empty or populated workspaces and walks through how plan mode, persistent tracking, and the MCP work together. Use when a user says "get started", "how do I use this", "quick start", "first time setup", "onboard me", "what can this MCP do", or "help me learn task orchestrator".

177 18
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results