Topic: claude-code
35,830 skills in this topic.
-
implementing-plans
Disciplined plan execution with checkpoint validation, progress tracking, and verification at each step. Follows an approved plan strictly, running verification criteria before proceeding.
bostonaholic/rpikit 8
-
parallel-agents
Concurrent agent dispatch for independent problems. Use when facing multiple independent tasks that can be worked on simultaneously. Reduces total time by parallelizing work that has no shared state.
bostonaholic/rpikit 8
-
receiving-code-review
Verification-first approach to code review feedback. Use when receiving review comments during the implement phase. Evaluate suggestions rigorously before implementing - no performative agreement.
bostonaholic/rpikit 8
-
research-plan-implement
End-to-end Research-Plan-Implement pipeline using parallel subagents. Each phase (research, plan, implement) runs in its own context window with file artifacts as the communication channel between phases.
bostonaholic/rpikit 8
-
researching-codebase
Thorough codebase exploration that builds understanding through collaborative dialogue. Investigates architecture, patterns, and implementation details before planning or making changes.
bostonaholic/rpikit 8
-
reviewing-code
Code review methodology for evaluating implementation changes. Use when reviewing code changes for quality, design, correctness, and maintainability. Focuses on changes made during implementation using Conventional Comments for clear, actionable feedback.
bostonaholic/rpikit 8
-
security-review
Security review methodology for evaluating implementation changes. Use when reviewing code changes for vulnerabilities, insecure patterns, and security best practices. Focuses on changes made during implementation rather than full codebase audits.
bostonaholic/rpikit 8
-
synthesizing-research
Consolidate multiple parallel research documents into a single unified report. Produces a self-contained document that a reader with no prior context can understand completely.
bostonaholic/rpikit 8
-
systematic-debugging
Root cause investigation methodology for bugs and failures. Use when encountering test failures, unexpected behavior, or errors during research or implement phases. Find the cause before attempting fixes.
bostonaholic/rpikit 8
-
test-driven-development
Rigorous TDD methodology enforcing RED-GREEN-REFACTOR discipline. Use when implementing features or fixing bugs during the implement phase. Tests must be written before production code - no exceptions.
bostonaholic/rpikit 8
-
verification-before-completion
Evidence-before-claims discipline for implementation completion. Use before claiming any work is complete, fixed, or passing. Run verification commands and confirm output before making success claims.
bostonaholic/rpikit 8
-
writing-plans
Transform research findings into actionable implementation plans with granular steps, verification criteria, and stakes-based enforcement. Plans serve as contracts between human and AI.
bostonaholic/rpikit 8
-
brainstorming
Collaborative design exploration that refines ideas into validated specs through iterative questioning. Use before any creative work including creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior.
CodingCossack/agent-skills-library 17
-
dispatching-parallel-agents
Dispatches one subagent per independent domain to parallelize investigation/fixes. Use when you have 2+ unrelated failures (e.g., separate failing test files, subsystems, bugs) with no shared state or ordering dependencies.
CodingCossack/agent-skills-library 17
-
executing-plans
Disciplined plan execution for implementation tasks. Use when executing a saved implementation plan, following step-by-step instructions from a plan document.
CodingCossack/agent-skills-library 17
-
finishing-a-development-branch
Git branch completion workflow. Use when implementation is complete, tests pass, and a feature branch needs to be integrated via merge, pull request, or cleanup.
CodingCossack/agent-skills-library 17
-
receiving-code-review
Assesses and responds to incoming code review feedback on PRs (reviewer comments, requested changes), especially when suggestions are unclear, technically questionable, or scope-expanding. Use before implementing review suggestions to align on intent and keep changes minimal.
CodingCossack/agent-skills-library 17
-
requesting-code-review
Use when you need to request a code review for a PR/MR and want a consistent review brief (context, scope, risk areas, test instructions, acceptance criteria) before merge.
CodingCossack/agent-skills-library 17
-
subagent-driven-development
Sequential subagent execution with two-stage review gates for implementation plans. Use when executing multi-task plans in current session, when tasks need fresh subagent context to avoid pollution, when formal review cycles (spec compliance then code quality) are required between tasks, or when you need diff-based validation of each task before proceeding.
CodingCossack/agent-skills-library 17
-
systematic-debugging
Root cause analysis for debugging. Use when bugs, test failures, or unexpected behavior have non-obvious causes, or after multiple fix attempts have failed.
CodingCossack/agent-skills-library 17
-
test-driven-development
Red-green-refactor development methodology requiring verified test coverage. Use for feature implementation, bugfixes, refactoring, or any behavior changes where tests must prove correctness.
CodingCossack/agent-skills-library 17
-
using-git-worktrees
Git worktree–based workspace isolation for parallel or non-disruptive development. Use when work must occur without modifying or interfering with the current working tree.
CodingCossack/agent-skills-library 17
-
using-superpowers
Meta-skill enforcing skill discovery and invocation discipline through mandatory workflows. Use when starting any conversation to check for relevant skills before any response, ensuring skill-first workflow before proceeding.
CodingCossack/agent-skills-library 17
-
verification-before-completion
Verification discipline for completion claims. Use when about to assert success, claim a fix is complete, report tests passing, or before commits and PRs. Enforces evidence-first workflow.
CodingCossack/agent-skills-library 17