Agent skill

drone-cv-expert

Expert in drone systems, computer vision, and autonomous navigation. Specializes in flight control, SLAM, object detection, sensor fusion, and path planning. Activate on "drone", "UAV", "SLAM", "visual odometry", "PID control", "MAVLink", "Pixhawk", "path planning", "A*", "RRT", "EKF", "sensor fusion", "optical flow", "ByteTrack". NOT for domain-specific inspection tasks like fire detection, roof damage assessment, or thermal analysis (use drone-inspection-specialist), GPU shader optimization (use metal-shader-expert), or general image classification without drone context (use clip-aware-embeddings).

Stars 81
Forks 12

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/curiositech/some_claude_skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/drone-cv-expert

Metadata

Additional technical details for this skill

tags
drone slam navigation sensor-fusion path-planning
category
AI & Machine Learning
pairs with
[
    {
        "skill": "drone-inspection-specialist",
        "reason": "Domain-specific inspection tasks"
    },
    {
        "skill": "physics-rendering-expert",
        "reason": "Physics simulation for drone systems"
    }
]

SKILL.md

Drone CV Expert

Expert in robotics, drone systems, and computer vision for autonomous aerial platforms.

Decision Tree: When to Use This Skill

User mentions drones or UAVs?
├─ YES → Is it about inspection/detection of specific things (fire, roof damage, thermal)?
│        ├─ YES → Use drone-inspection-specialist
│        └─ NO → Is it about flight control, navigation, or general CV?
│                ├─ YES → Use THIS SKILL (drone-cv-expert)
│                └─ NO → Is it about GPU rendering/shaders?
│                        ├─ YES → Use metal-shader-expert
│                        └─ NO → Use THIS SKILL as default drone skill
└─ NO → Is it general object detection without drone context?
        ├─ YES → Use clip-aware-embeddings or other CV skill
        └─ NO → Probably not a drone question

Core Competencies

Flight Control & Navigation

  • PID Tuning: Position, velocity, attitude control loops
  • SLAM: ORB-SLAM, LSD-SLAM, visual-inertial odometry (VIO)
  • Path Planning: A*, RRT, RRT*, Dijkstra, potential fields
  • Sensor Fusion: EKF, UKF, complementary filters
  • GPS-Denied Navigation: AprilTags, visual odometry, LiDAR SLAM

Computer Vision

  • Object Detection: YOLO (v5/v8/v10), EfficientDet, SSD
  • Tracking: ByteTrack, DeepSORT, SORT, optical flow
  • Edge Deployment: TensorRT, ONNX, OpenVINO optimization
  • 3D Vision: Stereo depth, point clouds, structure-from-motion

Hardware Integration

  • Flight Controllers: Pixhawk, Ardupilot, PX4, DJI
  • Protocols: MAVLink, DroneKit, MAVSDK
  • Edge Compute: Jetson (Nano/Xavier/Orin), Coral TPU
  • Sensors: IMU, GPS, barometer, LiDAR, depth cameras

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

1. "Simulation-Only Syndrome"

Wrong: Testing only in Gazebo/AirSim, then deploying directly to real drone. Right: Simulation → Bench test → Tethered flight → Controlled environment → Field.

2. "EKF Overkill"

Wrong: Using Extended Kalman Filter when complementary filter suffices. Right: Match filter complexity to requirements:

  • Complementary filter: Basic stabilization, attitude only
  • EKF: Multi-sensor fusion, GPS+IMU+baro
  • UKF: Highly nonlinear systems, aggressive maneuvers

3. "Max Resolution Assumption"

Wrong: Processing 4K frames at 30fps expecting real-time performance. Right: Resolution trade-offs by altitude/speed:

Altitude Speed Resolution FPS Rationale
<30m Slow 1920x1080 30 Detail needed
30-100m Medium 1280x720 30 Balance
>100m Fast 640x480 60 Speed priority

4. "Single-Thread Processing"

Wrong: Sequential detect → track → control in one loop. Right: Pipeline parallelism:

Thread 1: Camera capture (async)
Thread 2: Object detection (GPU)
Thread 3: Tracking + state estimation
Thread 4: Control commands

5. "GPS Trust"

Wrong: Assuming GPS is always accurate and available. Right: Multi-source position estimation:

  • GPS: 2-5m accuracy outdoor, unavailable indoor
  • Visual odometry: 0.1-1% drift, lighting dependent
  • AprilTags: cm-level accuracy where deployed
  • IMU: Short-term only, drift accumulates

6. "One Model Fits All"

Wrong: Using same YOLO model for all scenarios. Right: Model selection by constraint:

Constraint Model Notes
Latency critical YOLOv8n 6ms inference
Balanced YOLOv8s 15ms, better accuracy
Accuracy first YOLOv8x 50ms, highest mAP
Edge device YOLOv8n + TensorRT 3ms on Jetson

Problem-Solving Framework

1. Constraint Analysis

  • Compute: What hardware? (Jetson Nano = ~5 TOPS, Xavier = 32 TOPS)
  • Power: Battery capacity? Flight time impact?
  • Latency: Control loop rate? Detection response time?
  • Weight: Payload capacity? Center of gravity?
  • Environment: Indoor/outdoor? GPS available? Lighting conditions?

2. Algorithm Selection Matrix

Problem Classical Approach Deep Learning When to Use Each
Feature tracking KLT optical flow FlowNet Classical: Real-time, limited compute. DL: Robust, more compute
Object detection HOG+SVM YOLO/SSD Classical: Simple objects, no GPU. DL: Complex, GPU available
SLAM ORB-SLAM DROID-SLAM Classical: Mature, debuggable. DL: Better in challenging scenes
Path planning A*, RRT RL-based Classical: Known environments. DL: Complex, dynamic

3. Safety Checklist

  • Kill switch tested and accessible
  • Geofence configured
  • Return-to-home altitude set
  • Low battery action defined
  • Signal loss action defined
  • Propeller guards (if applicable)
  • Pre-flight sensor calibration
  • Weather conditions checked

Quick Reference Tables

MAVLink Message Types

Message Purpose Frequency
HEARTBEAT Connection alive 1 Hz
ATTITUDE Roll/pitch/yaw 10-100 Hz
LOCAL_POSITION_NED Position 10-50 Hz
GPS_RAW_INT Raw GPS 1-10 Hz
SET_POSITION_TARGET Commands As needed

Kalman Filter Tuning

Matrix High Values Low Values
Q (process noise) Trust measurements more Trust model more
R (measurement noise) Trust model more Trust measurements more
P (initial covariance) Uncertain initial state Confident initial state

Common Coordinate Frames

Frame Origin Axes Use
NED Takeoff point North-East-Down Navigation
ENU Takeoff point East-North-Up ROS standard
Body Drone CG Forward-Right-Down Control
Camera Lens center Right-Down-Forward Vision

Reference Files

Detailed implementations in references/:

  • navigation-algorithms.md - SLAM, path planning, localization
  • sensor-fusion-ekf.md - Kalman filters, multi-sensor fusion
  • object-detection-tracking.md - YOLO, ByteTrack, optical flow

Simulation Tools

Tool Strengths Weaknesses Best For
Gazebo ROS integration, physics Graphics quality ROS development
AirSim Photorealistic, CV-focused Windows-centric Vision algorithms
Webots Multi-robot, accessible Less drone-specific Swarm simulations
MATLAB/Simulink Control design Not real-time Controller tuning

Emerging Technologies (2024-2025)

  • Event cameras: 1μs temporal resolution, no motion blur
  • Neuromorphic computing: Loihi 2 for ultra-low-power inference
  • 4D Radar: Velocity + 3D position, works in all weather
  • Swarm autonomy: Decentralized coordination, emergent behavior
  • Foundation models: SAM, CLIP for zero-shot detection

Integration Points

  • drone-inspection-specialist: Domain-specific detection (fire, damage, thermal)
  • metal-shader-expert: GPU-accelerated vision processing, custom shaders
  • collage-layout-expert: Report generation, visual composition

Key Principle: In drone systems, reliability trumps performance. A 95% accurate system that never crashes is better than 99% accurate that fails unpredictably. Always have fallbacks.

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

curiositech/some_claude_skills

3d-cv-labeling-2026

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

81 12
Explore
curiositech/some_claude_skills

project-management-guru-adhd

Expert project manager for ADHD engineers managing multiple concurrent projects. Specializes in hyperfocus management, context-switching minimization, and parakeet-style gentle reminders. Activate on 'ADHD project management', 'context switching', 'hyperfocus', 'task prioritization', 'multiple projects', 'productivity for ADHD', 'task chunking', 'deadline management'. NOT for neurotypical project management, rigid waterfall processes, or general productivity advice without ADHD context.

81 12
Explore
curiositech/some_claude_skills

large-scale-map-visualization

Master of high-performance web map implementations handling 5,000-100,000+ geographic data points. Specializes in Leaflet.js optimization, Supercluster algorithms, viewport-based loading, canvas rendering, and progressive disclosure UX patterns.

81 12
Explore
curiositech/some_claude_skills

adhd-design-expert

Designs digital experiences for ADHD brains using neuroscience research and UX principles. Expert in reducing cognitive load, time blindness solutions, dopamine-driven engagement, and compassionate design patterns. Activate on 'ADHD design', 'cognitive load', 'accessibility', 'neurodivergent UX', 'time blindness', 'dopamine-driven', 'executive function'. NOT for general accessibility (WCAG only), neurotypical UX design, or simple UI styling without ADHD context.

81 12
Explore
curiositech/some_claude_skills

liaison

Translate multi-agent ecosystem activity into human-readable status briefings, decision requests, and progress summaries. Use for 'status update', 'brief me', 'what happened', 'summarize progress'. NOT for project planning (use project-management-guru-adhd), code review, or technical documentation.

81 12
Explore
curiositech/some_claude_skills

windows-95-web-designer

Modern web applications with authentic Windows 95 aesthetic. Gradient title bars, Start menu paradigm, taskbar patterns, 3D beveled chrome. Extrapolates Win95 to AI chatbots, mobile UIs, responsive layouts. Activate on 'windows 95', 'win95', 'start menu', 'taskbar', 'retro desktop', '95 aesthetic', 'clippy'. NOT for Windows 3.1 (use windows-3-1-web-designer), vaporwave/synthwave, macOS, flat design.

81 12
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results