Agent skill
computer-vision-pipeline
Build production computer vision pipelines for object detection, tracking, and video analysis. Handles drone footage, wildlife monitoring, and real-time detection. Supports YOLO, Detectron2, TensorFlow, PyTorch. Use for archaeological surveys, conservation, security. Activate on "object detection", "video analysis", "YOLO", "tracking", "drone footage". NOT for simple image filters, photo editing, or face recognition APIs.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/curiositech/some_claude_skills/tree/main/.claude/skills/computer-vision-pipeline
Metadata
Additional technical details for this skill
- tags
-
computer vision pipeline object-detection video-analysis
- category
- AI & Machine Learning
- pairs with
-
[ { "skill": "drone-cv-expert", "reason": "Drone footage is a primary input source for production CV pipelines" }, { "skill": "clip-aware-embeddings", "reason": "CLIP embeddings provide semantic understanding for CV pipeline classification stages" }, { "skill": "data-pipeline-engineer", "reason": "Video/image processing pipelines share ETL patterns for batching, queuing, and error handling" }, { "skill": "geospatial-data-pipeline", "reason": "Geospatial CV pipelines combine coordinate transforms with object detection outputs" } ]
SKILL.md
Computer Vision Pipeline
Expert in building production-ready computer vision systems for object detection, tracking, and video analysis.
When to Use
✅ Use for:
- Drone footage analysis (archaeological surveys, conservation)
- Wildlife monitoring and tracking
- Real-time object detection systems
- Video preprocessing and analysis
- Custom model training and inference
- Multi-object tracking (MOT)
❌ NOT for:
- Simple image filters (use Pillow/PIL)
- Photo editing (use Photoshop/GIMP)
- Face recognition APIs (use AWS Rekognition)
- Basic OCR (use Tesseract)
Technology Selection
Object Detection Models
| Model | Speed (FPS) | Accuracy (mAP) | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| YOLOv8 | 140 | 53.9% | Real-time detection |
| Detectron2 | 25 | 58.7% | High accuracy, research |
| EfficientDet | 35 | 55.1% | Mobile deployment |
| Faster R-CNN | 10 | 42.0% | Legacy systems |
Timeline:
- 2015: Faster R-CNN (two-stage detection)
- 2016: YOLO v1 (one-stage, real-time)
- 2020: YOLOv5 (PyTorch, production-ready)
- 2023: YOLOv8 (state-of-the-art)
- 2024: YOLOv8 is industry standard for real-time
Decision tree:
Need real-time (>30 FPS)? → YOLOv8
Need highest accuracy? → Detectron2 Mask R-CNN
Need mobile deployment? → YOLOv8-nano or EfficientDet
Need instance segmentation? → Detectron2 or YOLOv8-seg
Need custom objects? → Fine-tune YOLOv8
Common Anti-Patterns
Anti-Pattern 1: Not Preprocessing Frames Before Detection
Novice thinking: "Just run detection on raw video frames"
Problem: Poor detection accuracy, wasted GPU cycles.
Wrong approach:
# ❌ No preprocessing - poor results
import cv2
from ultralytics import YOLO
model = YOLO('yolov8n.pt')
video = cv2.VideoCapture('drone_footage.mp4')
while True:
ret, frame = video.read()
if not ret:
break
# Raw frame detection - no normalization, no resizing
results = model(frame)
# Poor accuracy, slow inference
Why wrong:
- Video resolution too high (4K = 8.3 megapixels per frame)
- No normalization (pixel values 0-255 instead of 0-1)
- Aspect ratio not maintained
- GPU memory overflow on high-res frames
Correct approach:
# ✅ Proper preprocessing pipeline
import cv2
import numpy as np
from ultralytics import YOLO
model = YOLO('yolov8n.pt')
video = cv2.VideoCapture('drone_footage.mp4')
# Model expects 640x640 input
TARGET_SIZE = 640
def preprocess_frame(frame):
# Resize while maintaining aspect ratio
h, w = frame.shape[:2]
scale = TARGET_SIZE / max(h, w)
new_w, new_h = int(w * scale), int(h * scale)
resized = cv2.resize(frame, (new_w, new_h), interpolation=cv2.INTER_LINEAR)
# Pad to square
pad_w = (TARGET_SIZE - new_w) // 2
pad_h = (TARGET_SIZE - new_h) // 2
padded = cv2.copyMakeBorder(
resized,
pad_h, TARGET_SIZE - new_h - pad_h,
pad_w, TARGET_SIZE - new_w - pad_w,
cv2.BORDER_CONSTANT,
value=(114, 114, 114) # Gray padding
)
# Normalize to 0-1 (if model expects it)
# normalized = padded.astype(np.float32) / 255.0
return padded, scale
while True:
ret, frame = video.read()
if not ret:
break
preprocessed, scale = preprocess_frame(frame)
results = model(preprocessed)
# Scale bounding boxes back to original coordinates
for box in results[0].boxes:
x1, y1, x2, y2 = box.xyxy[0]
x1, y1, x2, y2 = x1/scale, y1/scale, x2/scale, y2/scale
Performance comparison:
- Raw 4K frames: 5 FPS, 72% mAP
- Preprocessed 640x640: 45 FPS, 89% mAP
Timeline context:
- 2015: Manual preprocessing required
- 2020: YOLOv5 added auto-resize
- 2023: YOLOv8 has smart preprocessing but explicit control is better
Anti-Pattern 2: Processing Every Frame in Video
Novice thinking: "Run detection on every single frame"
Problem: 99% of frames are redundant, wasting compute.
Wrong approach:
# ❌ Process every frame (30 FPS video = 1800 frames/min)
import cv2
from ultralytics import YOLO
model = YOLO('yolov8n.pt')
video = cv2.VideoCapture('drone_footage.mp4')
detections = []
while True:
ret, frame = video.read()
if not ret:
break
# Run detection on EVERY frame
results = model(frame)
detections.append(results)
# 10-minute video = 18,000 inferences (15 minutes on GPU)
Why wrong:
- Adjacent frames are nearly identical
- Wasting 95% of compute on duplicate work
- Slow processing time
- Massive storage for results
Correct approach 1: Frame sampling
# ✅ Sample every Nth frame
import cv2
from ultralytics import YOLO
model = YOLO('yolov8n.pt')
video = cv2.VideoCapture('drone_footage.mp4')
SAMPLE_RATE = 30 # Process 1 frame per second (if 30 FPS video)
frame_count = 0
detections = []
while True:
ret, frame = video.read()
if not ret:
break
frame_count += 1
# Only process every 30th frame
if frame_count % SAMPLE_RATE == 0:
results = model(frame)
detections.append({
'frame': frame_count,
'timestamp': frame_count / 30.0,
'results': results
})
# 10-minute video = 600 inferences (30 seconds on GPU)
Correct approach 2: Adaptive sampling with scene change detection
# ✅ Only process when scene changes significantly
import cv2
import numpy as np
from ultralytics import YOLO
model = YOLO('yolov8n.pt')
video = cv2.VideoCapture('drone_footage.mp4')
def scene_changed(prev_frame, curr_frame, threshold=0.3):
"""Detect scene change using histogram comparison"""
if prev_frame is None:
return True
# Convert to grayscale
prev_gray = cv2.cvtColor(prev_frame, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
curr_gray = cv2.cvtColor(curr_frame, cv2.COLOR_BGR2GRAY)
# Calculate histograms
prev_hist = cv2.calcHist([prev_gray], [0], None, [256], [0, 256])
curr_hist = cv2.calcHist([curr_gray], [0], None, [256], [0, 256])
# Compare histograms
correlation = cv2.compareHist(prev_hist, curr_hist, cv2.HISTCMP_CORREL)
return correlation < (1 - threshold)
prev_frame = None
detections = []
while True:
ret, frame = video.read()
if not ret:
break
# Only run detection if scene changed
if scene_changed(prev_frame, frame):
results = model(frame)
detections.append(results)
prev_frame = frame.copy()
# Adapts to video content - static shots skip frames, action scenes process more
Savings:
- Every frame: 18,000 inferences
- Sample 1 FPS: 600 inferences (97% reduction)
- Adaptive: ~1,200 inferences (93% reduction)
Anti-Pattern 3: Not Using Batch Inference
Novice thinking: "Process one image at a time"
Problem: GPU sits idle 80% of the time waiting for data.
Wrong approach:
# ❌ Sequential processing - GPU underutilized
import cv2
from ultralytics import YOLO
import time
model = YOLO('yolov8n.pt')
# 100 images to process
image_paths = [f'frame_{i:04d}.jpg' for i in range(100)]
start = time.time()
for path in image_paths:
frame = cv2.imread(path)
results = model(frame) # Process one at a time
# GPU utilization: ~20%
elapsed = time.time() - start
print(f"Processed {len(image_paths)} images in {elapsed:.2f}s")
# Output: 45 seconds
Why wrong:
- GPU has to wait for CPU to load each image
- No parallelization
- GPU utilization ~20%
- Slow throughput
Correct approach:
# ✅ Batch inference - GPU fully utilized
import cv2
from ultralytics import YOLO
import time
model = YOLO('yolov8n.pt')
image_paths = [f'frame_{i:04d}.jpg' for i in range(100)]
BATCH_SIZE = 16 # Process 16 images at once
start = time.time()
for i in range(0, len(image_paths), BATCH_SIZE):
batch_paths = image_paths[i:i+BATCH_SIZE]
# Load batch
frames = [cv2.imread(path) for path in batch_paths]
# Batch inference (single GPU call)
results = model(frames) # Pass list of images
# GPU utilization: ~85%
elapsed = time.time() - start
print(f"Processed {len(image_paths)} images in {elapsed:.2f}s")
# Output: 8 seconds (5.6x faster!)
Performance comparison:
| Method | Time (100 images) | GPU Util | Throughput |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sequential | 45s | 20% | 2.2 img/s |
| Batch (16) | 8s | 85% | 12.5 img/s |
| Batch (32) | 6s | 92% | 16.7 img/s |
Batch size tuning:
# Find optimal batch size for your GPU
import torch
def find_optimal_batch_size(model, image_size=(640, 640)):
for batch_size in [1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64]:
try:
dummy_input = torch.randn(batch_size, 3, *image_size).cuda()
start = time.time()
with torch.no_grad():
_ = model(dummy_input)
elapsed = time.time() - start
throughput = batch_size / elapsed
print(f"Batch {batch_size}: {throughput:.1f} img/s")
except RuntimeError as e:
print(f"Batch {batch_size}: OOM (out of memory)")
break
# Find optimal batch size before production
find_optimal_batch_size(model)
Anti-Pattern 4: Ignoring Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS) Tuning
Problem: Duplicate detections, missed objects, slow post-processing.
Wrong approach:
# ❌ Use default NMS settings for everything
from ultralytics import YOLO
model = YOLO('yolov8n.pt')
# Default settings (iou_threshold=0.45, conf_threshold=0.25)
results = model('crowded_scene.jpg')
# Result: 50 bounding boxes, 30 are duplicates!
Why wrong:
- Default IoU=0.45 is too permissive for dense objects
- Default conf=0.25 includes low-quality detections
- No adaptation to use case
Correct approach:
# ✅ Tune NMS for your use case
from ultralytics import YOLO
model = YOLO('yolov8n.pt')
# Sparse objects (dolphins in ocean)
sparse_results = model(
'ocean_footage.jpg',
iou=0.5, # Higher IoU = allow closer boxes
conf=0.4 # Higher confidence = fewer false positives
)
# Dense objects (crowd, flock of birds)
dense_results = model(
'crowded_scene.jpg',
iou=0.3, # Lower IoU = suppress more duplicates
conf=0.5 # Higher confidence = filter noise
)
# High precision needed (legal evidence)
precise_results = model(
'evidence.jpg',
iou=0.5,
conf=0.7, # Very high confidence
max_det=50 # Limit max detections
)
NMS parameter guide:
| Use Case | IoU | Conf | Max Det |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sparse objects (wildlife) | 0.5 | 0.4 | 100 |
| Dense objects (crowd) | 0.3 | 0.5 | 300 |
| High precision (evidence) | 0.5 | 0.7 | 50 |
| Real-time (speed priority) | 0.45 | 0.3 | 100 |
Anti-Pattern 5: No Tracking Between Frames
Novice thinking: "Run detection on each frame independently"
Problem: Can't count unique objects, track movement, or build trajectories.
Wrong approach:
# ❌ Independent frame detection - no object identity
from ultralytics import YOLO
import cv2
model = YOLO('yolov8n.pt')
video = cv2.VideoCapture('dolphins.mp4')
detections = []
while True:
ret, frame = video.read()
if not ret:
break
results = model(frame)
detections.append(results)
# Result: Can't tell if frame 10 dolphin is same as frame 20 dolphin
# Can't count unique dolphins
# Can't track trajectories
Why wrong:
- No object identity across frames
- Can't count unique objects
- Can't analyze movement patterns
- Can't build trajectories
Correct approach: Use tracking (ByteTrack)
# ✅ Multi-object tracking with ByteTrack
from ultralytics import YOLO
import cv2
# YOLO with tracking
model = YOLO('yolov8n.pt')
video = cv2.VideoCapture('dolphins.mp4')
# Track objects across frames
tracks = {}
while True:
ret, frame = video.read()
if not ret:
break
# Run detection + tracking
results = model.track(
frame,
persist=True, # Maintain IDs across frames
tracker='bytetrack.yaml' # ByteTrack algorithm
)
# Each detection now has persistent ID
for box in results[0].boxes:
track_id = int(box.id[0]) # Unique ID across frames
x1, y1, x2, y2 = box.xyxy[0]
# Store trajectory
if track_id not in tracks:
tracks[track_id] = []
tracks[track_id].append({
'frame': len(tracks[track_id]),
'bbox': (x1, y1, x2, y2),
'conf': box.conf[0]
})
# Now we can analyze:
print(f"Unique dolphins detected: {len(tracks)}")
# Trajectory analysis
for track_id, trajectory in tracks.items():
if len(trajectory) > 30: # Only long tracks
print(f"Dolphin {track_id} appeared in {len(trajectory)} frames")
# Calculate movement, speed, etc.
Tracking benefits:
- Count unique objects (not just detections per frame)
- Build trajectories and movement patterns
- Analyze behavior over time
- Filter out brief false positives
Tracking algorithms:
| Algorithm | Speed | Robustness | Occlusion Handling |
|---|---|---|---|
| ByteTrack | Fast | Good | Excellent |
| SORT | Very Fast | Fair | Fair |
| DeepSORT | Medium | Excellent | Good |
| BotSORT | Medium | Excellent | Excellent |
Production Checklist
□ Preprocess frames (resize, pad, normalize)
□ Sample frames intelligently (1 FPS or scene change detection)
□ Use batch inference (16-32 images per batch)
□ Tune NMS thresholds for your use case
□ Implement tracking if analyzing video
□ Log inference time and GPU utilization
□ Handle edge cases (empty frames, corrupted video)
□ Save results in structured format (JSON, CSV)
□ Visualize detections for debugging
□ Benchmark on representative data
When to Use vs Avoid
| Scenario | Appropriate? |
|---|---|
| Analyze drone footage for archaeology | ✅ Yes - custom object detection |
| Track wildlife in video | ✅ Yes - detection + tracking |
| Count people in crowd | ✅ Yes - dense object detection |
| Real-time security camera | ✅ Yes - YOLOv8 real-time |
| Filter vacation photos | ❌ No - use photo management apps |
| Face recognition login | ❌ No - use AWS Rekognition API |
| Read license plates | ❌ No - use specialized OCR |
References
/references/yolo-guide.md- YOLOv8 setup, training, inference patterns/references/video-processing.md- Frame extraction, scene detection, optimization/references/tracking-algorithms.md- ByteTrack, SORT, DeepSORT comparison
Scripts
scripts/video_analyzer.py- Extract frames, run detection, generate timelinescripts/model_trainer.py- Fine-tune YOLO on custom dataset, export weights
This skill guides: Computer vision | Object detection | Video analysis | YOLO | Tracking | Drone footage | Wildlife monitoring
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
3d-cv-labeling-2026
Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).
project-management-guru-adhd
Expert project manager for ADHD engineers managing multiple concurrent projects. Specializes in hyperfocus management, context-switching minimization, and parakeet-style gentle reminders. Activate on 'ADHD project management', 'context switching', 'hyperfocus', 'task prioritization', 'multiple projects', 'productivity for ADHD', 'task chunking', 'deadline management'. NOT for neurotypical project management, rigid waterfall processes, or general productivity advice without ADHD context.
large-scale-map-visualization
Master of high-performance web map implementations handling 5,000-100,000+ geographic data points. Specializes in Leaflet.js optimization, Supercluster algorithms, viewport-based loading, canvas rendering, and progressive disclosure UX patterns.
adhd-design-expert
Designs digital experiences for ADHD brains using neuroscience research and UX principles. Expert in reducing cognitive load, time blindness solutions, dopamine-driven engagement, and compassionate design patterns. Activate on 'ADHD design', 'cognitive load', 'accessibility', 'neurodivergent UX', 'time blindness', 'dopamine-driven', 'executive function'. NOT for general accessibility (WCAG only), neurotypical UX design, or simple UI styling without ADHD context.
liaison
Translate multi-agent ecosystem activity into human-readable status briefings, decision requests, and progress summaries. Use for 'status update', 'brief me', 'what happened', 'summarize progress'. NOT for project planning (use project-management-guru-adhd), code review, or technical documentation.
windows-95-web-designer
Modern web applications with authentic Windows 95 aesthetic. Gradient title bars, Start menu paradigm, taskbar patterns, 3D beveled chrome. Extrapolates Win95 to AI chatbots, mobile UIs, responsive layouts. Activate on 'windows 95', 'win95', 'start menu', 'taskbar', 'retro desktop', '95 aesthetic', 'clippy'. NOT for Windows 3.1 (use windows-3-1-web-designer), vaporwave/synthwave, macOS, flat design.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?