Agent skill
bindcraft
End-to-end binder design using BindCraft hallucination. Use this skill when: (1) Designing protein binders with built-in AF2 validation, (2) Running production-quality binder campaigns, (3) Using different design protocols (fast, default, slow), (4) Need joint backbone and sequence optimization, (5) Want high experimental success rate. For backbone-only generation, use rfdiffusion. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc. For tool selection guidance, use binder-design.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills/tree/main/skills/bindcraft
SKILL.md
BindCraft Binder Design
Prerequisites
| Requirement | Minimum | Recommended |
|---|---|---|
| Python | 3.9+ | 3.10 |
| CUDA | 11.7+ | 12.0+ |
| GPU VRAM | 32GB | 48GB (L40S) |
| RAM | 32GB | 64GB |
How to run
First time? See Installation Guide to set up Modal and biomodals.
Option 1: Modal (recommended)
cd biomodals
modal run modal_bindcraft.py \
--target-pdb target.pdb \
--target-chain A \
--binder-lengths 70-100 \
--hotspots "A45,A67,A89" \
--num-designs 50
GPU: L40S (48GB) | Timeout: 3600s default
Option 2: Local installation
git clone https://github.com/martinpacesa/BindCraft.git
cd BindCraft
pip install -r requirements.txt
python bindcraft.py \
--target target.pdb \
--target_chains A \
--binder_lengths 70-100 \
--hotspots A45,A67,A89 \
--num_designs 50
Key parameters
| Parameter | Default | Range | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
--target-pdb |
required | path | Target structure |
--target-chain |
required | A-Z | Target chain(s) |
--binder-lengths |
70-100 | 40-150 | Length range |
--hotspots |
None | residues | Target hotspots |
--num-designs |
50 | 1-500 | Number of designs |
--protocol |
default | fast/default/slow | Quality vs speed |
Protocols
| Protocol | Speed | Quality | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| fast | Fast | Lower | Initial screening |
| default | Medium | Good | Standard campaigns |
| slow | Slow | High | Final production |
Output format
output/
├── design_0/
│ ├── binder.pdb # Final design
│ ├── complex.pdb # Binder + target
│ ├── metrics.json # QC scores
│ └── trajectory/ # Optimization trajectory
├── design_1/
│ └── ...
└── summary.csv # All metrics
Metrics Output
{
"plddt": 0.89,
"ptm": 0.78,
"iptm": 0.62,
"pae": 8.5,
"rmsd": 1.2,
"sequence": "MKTAYIAK..."
}
Sample output
Successful run
$ modal run modal_bindcraft.py --target-pdb target.pdb --num-designs 50
[INFO] Loading BindCraft model...
[INFO] Target: target.pdb (chain A)
[INFO] Hotspots: A45, A67, A89
[INFO] Protocol: default
[INFO] Generating 50 designs...
Design 1/50:
Length: 78 AA
pLDDT: 0.89, ipTM: 0.62
Saved: output/design_0/
Design 50/50:
Length: 85 AA
pLDDT: 0.86, ipTM: 0.58
Saved: output/design_49/
[INFO] Campaign complete. Summary: output/summary.csv
Pass rate: 32/50 (64%) with ipTM > 0.5
What good output looks like:
- pLDDT: > 0.85 for most designs
- ipTM: > 0.5 for passing designs
- Pass rate: 30-70% depending on target
- Diverse sequences across designs
Decision tree
Should I use BindCraft?
│
├─ What type of design?
│ ├─ Production-quality binders → BindCraft ✓
│ ├─ High diversity exploration → RFdiffusion
│ └─ All-atom precision → BoltzGen
│
├─ What matters most?
│ ├─ Experimental success rate → BindCraft ✓
│ ├─ Speed / diversity → RFdiffusion + ProteinMPNN
│ ├─ AF2 gradient optimization → ColabDesign
│ └─ All-atom control → BoltzGen
│
└─ Compute resources?
├─ Have L40S/A100 → BindCraft ✓
└─ Only A10G → RFdiffusion + ProteinMPNN
Typical performance
| Campaign Size | Time (L40S) | Cost (Modal) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 designs | 2-4h | ~$15 | Quick campaign |
| 100 designs | 4-8h | ~$30 | Standard |
| 200 designs | 8-16h | ~$60 | Large campaign |
Expected pass rate: 30-70% with ipTM > 0.5 (target-dependent).
Verify
find output -name "binder.pdb" | wc -l # Should match num_designs
Troubleshooting
Low ipTM scores: Check hotspot selection, increase designs Slow convergence: Use fast protocol for screening OOM errors: Reduce num_models, use L40S GPU Poor diversity: Lower sampling_temp, run multiple seeds
Error interpretation
| Error | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
RuntimeError: CUDA out of memory |
Large target or long binder | Use L40S/A100, reduce binder length |
ValueError: no hotspots |
Hotspots not found | Check residue numbering |
TimeoutError |
Design taking too long | Use fast protocol |
Next: Rank by ipsae → experimental validation.
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
vcf-annotator
Annotate VCF variants with VEP, ClinVar, gnomAD frequencies, and ancestry-aware context. Generates prioritised variant reports.
chemist-analyst
Analyzes events through chemistry lens using molecular structure, reaction mechanisms, thermodynamics, kinetics, and analytical techniques (spectroscopy, chromatography, mass spectrometry). Provides insights on chemical processes, material properties, reaction pathways, synthesis, and analytical methods. Use when: Chemical reactions, material analysis, synthesis planning, process optimization, environmental chemistry. Evaluates: Molecular structure, reaction mechanisms, yield, selectivity, safety, environmental impact.
bio-alignment-io
Read, write, and convert multiple sequence alignment files using Biopython Bio.AlignIO. Supports Clustal, PHYLIP, Stockholm, FASTA, Nexus, and other alignment formats for phylogenetics and conservation analysis. Use when reading, writing, or converting alignment file formats.
sleep-analyzer
分析睡眠数据、识别睡眠模式、评估睡眠质量,并提供个性化睡眠改善建议。支持与其他健康数据的关联分析。
metabolomics-workbench-database
Access NIH Metabolomics Workbench via REST API (4,200+ studies). Query metabolites, RefMet nomenclature, MS/NMR data, m/z searches, study metadata, for metabolomics and biomarker discovery.
bio-hi-c-analysis-matrix-operations
Balance, normalize, and transform Hi-C contact matrices using cooler and cooltools. Apply iterative correction (ICE), compute expected values, and generate observed/expected matrices. Use when normalizing or transforming Hi-C matrices.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?