Agent skill
vector-databases
Vector database selection, embedding storage, approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) algorithms, and vector search optimization. Use when choosing vector stores, designing semantic search, or optimizing similarity search performance.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/other/vector-databases-melodic-software-claude-code-plugins-dfbf9487
SKILL.md
Vector Databases
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Choosing between vector database options
- Designing semantic/similarity search systems
- Optimizing vector search performance
- Understanding ANN algorithm trade-offs
- Scaling vector search infrastructure
- Implementing hybrid search (vectors + filters)
Keywords: vector database, embeddings, vector search, similarity search, ANN, approximate nearest neighbor, HNSW, IVF, FAISS, Pinecone, Weaviate, Milvus, Qdrant, Chroma, pgvector, cosine similarity, semantic search
Vector Database Comparison
Managed Services
| Database | Strengths | Limitations | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinecone | Fully managed, easy scaling, enterprise | Vendor lock-in, cost at scale | Enterprise production |
| Weaviate Cloud | GraphQL, hybrid search, modules | Complexity | Knowledge graphs |
| Zilliz Cloud | Milvus-based, high performance | Learning curve | High-scale production |
| MongoDB Atlas Vector | Existing MongoDB users | Newer feature | MongoDB shops |
| Elastic Vector | Existing Elastic stack | Resource heavy | Search platforms |
Self-Hosted Options
| Database | Strengths | Limitations | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milvus | Feature-rich, scalable, GPU support | Operational complexity | Large-scale production |
| Qdrant | Rust performance, filtering, easy | Smaller ecosystem | Performance-focused |
| Weaviate | Modules, semantic, hybrid | Memory usage | Knowledge applications |
| Chroma | Simple, Python-native | Limited scale | Development, prototyping |
| pgvector | PostgreSQL extension | Performance limits | Postgres shops |
| FAISS | Library, not DB, fastest | No persistence, no filtering | Research, embedded |
Selection Decision Tree
Need managed, don't want operations?
├── Yes → Pinecone (simplest) or Weaviate Cloud
└── No (self-hosted)
└── Already using PostgreSQL?
├── Yes, <1M vectors → pgvector
└── No
└── Need maximum performance at scale?
├── Yes → Milvus or Qdrant
└── No
└── Prototyping/development?
├── Yes → Chroma
└── No → Qdrant (balanced choice)
ANN Algorithms
Algorithm Overview
Exact KNN:
• Search ALL vectors
• O(n) time complexity
• Perfect accuracy
• Impractical at scale
Approximate NN (ANN):
• Search SUBSET of vectors
• O(log n) to O(1) complexity
• Near-perfect accuracy
• Practical at any scale
HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small World)
Layer 3: ○───────────────────────○ (sparse, long connections)
│ │
Layer 2: ○───○───────○───────○───○ (medium density)
│ │ │ │ │
Layer 1: ○─○─○─○─○─○─○─○─○─○─○─○─○ (denser)
│││││││││││││││││││││││
Layer 0: ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ (all vectors)
Search: Start at top layer, greedily descend
• Fast: O(log n) search time
• High recall: >95% typically
• Memory: Extra graph storage
HNSW Parameters:
| Parameter | Description | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
M |
Connections per node | Memory vs. recall |
ef_construction |
Build-time search width | Build time vs. recall |
ef_search |
Query-time search width | Latency vs. recall |
IVF (Inverted File Index)
Clustering Phase:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Cluster vectors into K centroids │
│ │
│ ● ● ● ● │
│ /│\ /│\ /│\ /│\ │
│ ○○○○○ ○○○○○ ○○○○○ ○○○○○ │
│ Cluster 1 Cluster 2 Cluster 3 Cluster 4│
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
Search Phase:
1. Find nprobe nearest centroids
2. Search only those clusters
3. Much faster than exhaustive
IVF Parameters:
| Parameter | Description | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
nlist |
Number of clusters | Build time vs. search quality |
nprobe |
Clusters to search | Latency vs. recall |
IVF-PQ (Product Quantization)
Original Vector (128 dim):
[0.1, 0.2, ..., 0.9] (128 × 4 bytes = 512 bytes)
PQ Compressed (8 subvectors, 8-bit codes):
[23, 45, 12, 89, 56, 34, 78, 90] (8 bytes)
Memory reduction: 64x
Accuracy trade-off: ~5% recall drop
Algorithm Comparison
| Algorithm | Search Speed | Memory | Build Time | Recall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flat/Brute | Slow (O(n)) | Low | None | 100% |
| IVF | Fast | Low | Medium | 90-95% |
| IVF-PQ | Very fast | Very low | Medium | 85-92% |
| HNSW | Very fast | High | Slow | 95-99% |
| HNSW+PQ | Very fast | Medium | Slow | 90-95% |
When to Use Which
< 100K vectors:
└── Flat index (exact search is fast enough)
100K - 1M vectors:
└── HNSW (best recall/speed trade-off)
1M - 100M vectors:
├── Memory available → HNSW
└── Memory constrained → IVF-PQ or HNSW+PQ
> 100M vectors:
└── Sharded IVF-PQ or distributed HNSW
Distance Metrics
Common Metrics
| Metric | Formula | Range | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cosine Similarity | A·B / (||A|| ||B||) |
[-1, 1] | Normalized embeddings |
| Dot Product | A·B |
(-∞, ∞) | When magnitude matters |
| Euclidean (L2) | √Σ(A-B)² |
[0, ∞) | Absolute distances |
| Manhattan (L1) | Σ|A-B| |
[0, ∞) | High-dimensional sparse |
Metric Selection
Embeddings pre-normalized (unit vectors)?
├── Yes → Cosine = Dot Product (use Dot, faster)
└── No
└── Magnitude meaningful?
├── Yes → Dot Product
└── No → Cosine Similarity
Note: Most embedding models output normalized vectors
→ Dot product is usually the best choice
Filtering and Hybrid Search
Pre-filtering vs Post-filtering
Pre-filtering (Filter → Search):
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Apply metadata filter │
│ (category = "electronics") │
│ Result: 10K of 1M vectors │
│ │
│ 2. Vector search on 10K vectors │
│ Much faster, guaranteed filter match │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
Post-filtering (Search → Filter):
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Vector search on 1M vectors │
│ Return top-1000 │
│ │
│ 2. Apply metadata filter │
│ May return < K results! │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
Hybrid Search Architecture
Query: "wireless headphones under $100"
│
┌─────┴─────┐
▼ ▼
┌───────┐ ┌───────┐
│Vector │ │Filter │
│Search │ │ Build │
│"wire- │ │price │
│less │ │< 100 │
│head- │ │ │
│phones"│ │ │
└───────┘ └───────┘
│ │
└─────┬─────┘
▼
┌───────────┐
│ Combine │
│ Results │
└───────────┘
Metadata Index Design
| Metadata Type | Index Strategy | Query Example |
|---|---|---|
| Categorical | Bitmap/hash index | category = "books" |
| Numeric range | B-tree | price BETWEEN 10 AND 50 |
| Keyword search | Inverted index | tags CONTAINS "sale" |
| Geospatial | R-tree/geohash | location NEAR (lat, lng) |
Scaling Strategies
Sharding Approaches
Naive Sharding (by ID):
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ Shard 1 │ │ Shard 2 │ │ Shard 3 │
│ IDs 0-N │ │IDs N-2N │ │IDs 2N-3N│
└─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘
Query → Search ALL shards → Merge results
Semantic Sharding (by cluster):
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│ Shard 1 │ │ Shard 2 │ │ Shard 3 │
│ Tech │ │ Health │ │ Finance │
│ docs │ │ docs │ │ docs │
└─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘
Query → Route to relevant shard(s) → Faster!
Replication
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Load Balancer │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
│ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼
┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│Replica 1│ │Replica 2│ │Replica 3│
│ (Read) │ │ (Read) │ │ (Read) │
└─────────┘ └─────────┘ └─────────┘
│ │ │
└───────────┼───────────┘
│
┌─────────┐
│ Primary │
│ (Write) │
└─────────┘
Scaling Decision Matrix
| Scale (vectors) | Architecture | Replication |
|---|---|---|
| < 1M | Single node | Optional |
| 1-10M | Single node, more RAM | For HA |
| 10-100M | Sharded, few nodes | Required |
| 100M-1B | Sharded, many nodes | Required |
| > 1B | Sharded + tiered | Required |
Performance Optimization
Index Build Optimization
| Optimization | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Batch insertion | Insert in batches of 1K-10K | 10x faster |
| Parallel build | Multi-threaded index construction | 2-4x faster |
| Incremental index | Add to existing index | Avoids rebuild |
| GPU acceleration | Use GPU for training (IVF) | 10-100x faster |
Query Optimization
| Optimization | Description | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Warm cache | Keep index in memory | 10x latency reduction |
| Query batching | Batch similar queries | Higher throughput |
| Reduce dimensions | PCA, random projection | 2-4x faster |
| Early termination | Stop when "good enough" | Lower latency |
Memory Optimization
Memory per vector:
┌────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1536 dims × 4 bytes = 6KB per vector │
│ │
│ 1M vectors: │
│ Raw: 6GB │
│ + HNSW graph: +2-4GB (M-dependent) │
│ = 8-10GB total │
│ │
│ With PQ (64 subquantizers): │
│ 1M vectors: ~64MB │
│ = 100x reduction │
└────────────────────────────────────────┘
Operational Considerations
Backup and Recovery
| Strategy | Description | RPO/RTO |
|---|---|---|
| Snapshots | Periodic full backup | Hours |
| WAL replication | Write-ahead log streaming | Minutes |
| Real-time sync | Synchronous replication | Seconds |
Monitoring Metrics
| Metric | Description | Alert Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Query latency p99 | 99th percentile latency | > 100ms |
| Recall | Search accuracy | < 90% |
| QPS | Queries per second | Capacity dependent |
| Memory usage | Index memory | > 80% |
| Index freshness | Time since last update | Domain dependent |
Index Maintenance
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Index Maintenance Tasks │
├─────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ • Compaction: Merge small segments │
│ • Reindex: Rebuild degraded index │
│ • Vacuum: Remove deleted vectors │
│ • Optimize: Tune parameters │
│ │
│ Schedule during low-traffic periods │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
Common Patterns
Multi-Tenant Vector Search
Option 1: Namespace/Collection per tenant
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ tenant_1_collection │
│ tenant_2_collection │
│ tenant_3_collection │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
Pro: Complete isolation
Con: Many indexes, operational overhead
Option 2: Single collection + tenant filter
┌─────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ shared_collection │
│ metadata: { tenant_id: "..." } │
│ Pre-filter by tenant_id │
└─────────────────────────────────────────┘
Pro: Simpler operations
Con: Requires efficient filtering
Real-Time Updates
Write Path:
┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐ ┌─────────────┐
│ Write │ │ Buffer │ │ Merge │
│ Request │───▶│ (Memory) │───▶│ to Index │
└─────────────┘ └─────────────┘ └─────────────┘
Strategy:
1. Buffer writes in memory
2. Periodically merge to main index
3. Search: main index + buffer
4. Compact periodically
Embedding Versioning
Version 1 embeddings ──┐
│
Version 2 embeddings ──┼──▶ Parallel indexes during migration
│
│ ┌─────────────────────┐
└───▶│ Gradual reindexing │
│ Blue-green switch │
└─────────────────────┘
Cost Estimation
Storage Costs
Cost = (vectors × dimensions × bytes × replication) / GB × $/GB/month
Example:
10M vectors × 1536 dims × 4 bytes × 3 replicas = 184 GB
At $0.10/GB/month = $18.40/month storage
Note: Memory (for serving) costs more than storage
Compute Costs
Factors:
• QPS (queries per second)
• Latency requirements
• Index type (HNSW needs more RAM)
• Filtering complexity
Rule of thumb:
• 1M vectors, HNSW, <50ms latency: 16GB RAM
• 10M vectors, HNSW, <50ms latency: 64-128GB RAM
• 100M vectors: Distributed system required
Related Skills
rag-architecture- Using vector databases in RAG systemsllm-serving-patterns- LLM inference with vector retrievalml-system-design- End-to-end ML pipeline designestimation-techniques- Capacity planning for vector systems
Version History
- v1.0.0 (2025-12-26): Initial release - Vector database patterns for systems design
Last Updated
Date: 2025-12-26
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
agent-ops-spec
Manage specification documents in .agent/specs/. Use when user provides requirements, acceptance criteria, or feature descriptions that need to be tracked and validated against implementation.
agent-ops-state
Maintain .agent state files. Use at session start, after meaningful steps, and before concluding: read/update constitution/memory/focus/issues/baseline consistently.
agent-ops-spec
Manage specification documents in .agent/specs/. Use when user provides requirements, acceptance criteria, or feature descriptions that need to be tracked and validated against implementation.
agent-ops-testing
Test strategy, execution, and coverage analysis. Use when designing tests, running test suites, or analyzing test results beyond baseline checks.
agent-ops-testing
Test strategy, execution, and coverage analysis. Use when designing tests, running test suites, or analyzing test results beyond baseline checks.
agent-ops-state
Maintain .agent state files. Use at session start, after meaningful steps, and before concluding: read/update constitution/memory/focus/issues/baseline consistently.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?