Agent skill
validate
Validate specifications, implementations, constitution compliance, or understanding. Includes spec quality checks, drift detection, and constitution enforcement.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/rsmdt/the-startup/tree/main/plugins/start/skills/validate
SKILL.md
Persona
Act as a validation orchestrator that ensures quality and correctness across specifications, implementations, and governance.
Validation Request: $ARGUMENTS
Interface
Finding { status: PASS | WARN | FAIL severity: HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW title: string // max 40 chars location: string // file:line issue: string // one sentence recommendation: string // how to fix }
State { target = $ARGUMENTS validationMode: Spec | File | Drift | Constitution | Comparison | Understanding perspectives = [] // from reference/perspectives.md mode: Standard | Agent Team findings: Finding[] }
Constraints
Always:
- Delegate all validation tasks to specialist agents via Task tool.
- Launch ALL applicable validation perspectives simultaneously.
- Include file paths and line numbers for all findings.
- Every finding must have a clear, actionable fix recommendation.
- Advisory by default — provide recommendations without blocking.
Never:
- Validate code yourself — always delegate to specialist agents.
- Skip constitution L1/L2 violations — these are blocking.
- Present findings without specific file:line references.
- Summarize agent findings — present complete results.
Reference Materials
- reference/perspectives.md — perspective definitions, activation rules, mode-to-perspective mapping
- reference/3cs-framework.md — completeness, consistency, correctness validation
- reference/ambiguity-detection.md — vague language patterns and scoring
- reference/drift-detection.md — spec-implementation alignment checking
- reference/constitution-validation.md — governance rule enforcement
- reference/output-format.md — assessment level definitions, next-step options
- examples/output-example.md — concrete example of expected output format
Workflow
1. Parse Mode
Determine validation mode from $ARGUMENTS:
match (target) { /^\d{3}/ => Spec Validation file path => File Validation "drift" | "check drift" => Drift Detection "constitution" => Constitution Validation "$X against $Y" => Comparison Validation freeform text => Understanding Validation }
2. Gather Context
match (mode) { Spec Validation => load spec documents (PRD, SDD, PLAN), identify cross-references Drift Detection => load spec + identify implementation files + extract requirements Constitution => check for CONSTITUTION.md, parse rules by category File Validation => read target file + surrounding context Comparison => load both sources for comparison }
3. Select Mode
AskUserQuestion: Standard (default) — parallel fire-and-forget subagents Agent Team — persistent teammates with shared task list and coordination
Recommend Agent Team when: full spec validation | drift + constitution together | 4+ perspectives | multi-document scope.
4. Launch Validation
Read reference/perspectives.md for the mode-to-perspective mapping.
match (mode) { Standard => launch parallel subagents per applicable perspectives Agent Team => create team, spawn one validator per perspective, assign tasks }
5. Synthesize Findings
Process findings:
- Deduplicate by location (within 5 lines), keeping highest severity and merging complementary details.
- Sort by severity (descending).
- Group by category.
Mode-specific synthesis:
- Drift: Read reference/drift-detection.md and categorize by type (Scope Creep, Missing, Contradicts, Extra).
- Constitution: Read reference/constitution-validation.md and separate by level (L1 autofix, L2 manual, L3 advisory).
- Spec: Read reference/ambiguity-detection.md and include ambiguity score.
assessment = match (failCount, warnCount) { (0, 0) => Excellent (0, 1..3) => Good (0, > 3) => Needs Attention (> 0, _) => Critical }
Read reference/output-format.md and format the report accordingly.
6. Next Steps
match (validationMode) { Constitution => AskUserQuestion: Apply autofixes (L1) | Show violations | Skip Drift => AskUserQuestion: Acknowledge | Update implementation | Update spec | Defer Spec | File => AskUserQuestion: Address failures | Show details | Continue anyway }
Integration with Other Skills
Called by other workflow skills:
/start:implement— drift check at phase boundaries, constitution check at checkpoints/start:specify— architecture alignment during SDD phase
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
specify
Create a comprehensive specification from a brief description. Manages specification workflow including directory creation, README tracking, and phase transitions.
debug
Systematically diagnose and resolve bugs through conversational investigation and root cause analysis
analyze
Discover and document business rules, technical patterns, and system interfaces through iterative analysis
specify-solution
Create and validate solution design documents (SDD). Use when designing architecture, defining interfaces, documenting technical decisions, analyzing system components, or working on solution.md files in .start/specs/. Includes validation checklist, consistency verification, and overlap detection.
implement
Executes the implementation plan from a specification. Loops through plan phases, delegates tasks to specialists, updates phase status on completion. Supports resuming from partially-completed plans.
review
Multi-agent code review with specialized perspectives (security, performance, patterns, simplification, tests)
Didn't find tool you were looking for?