Agent skill

vague

This skill should be used when the user's request or requirement is ambiguous and needs iterative questioning to become actionable. Trigger on "clarify requirements", "refine requirements", "요구사항 명확히", "요구사항 정리", "뭘 원하는 건지", "make this clearer", "spec this out", "scope this", "/clarify". Turns vague inputs into concrete specs. For strategy blind spots use unknown; for content-vs-form reframing use metamedium.

Stars 692
Forks 85

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/team-attention/plugins-for-claude-natives/tree/main/plugins/clarify/skills/vague

SKILL.md

Vague: Requirement Clarification

Transform vague or ambiguous requirements into precise, actionable specifications through hypothesis-driven questioning. ALWAYS use the AskUserQuestion tool — never ask clarifying questions in plain text.

When to Use

  • Ambiguous feature requests ("add a login feature")
  • Incomplete bug reports ("the export is broken")
  • Underspecified tasks ("make the app faster")

For strategy/planning blind spot analysis, use the unknown skill. For content-vs-form reframing, use the metamedium skill.

Core Principle: Hypotheses as Options

Present plausible interpretations as options instead of asking open questions. Each option is a testable hypothesis about what the user actually means.

BAD:  "What kind of login do you want?"           ← open question, high cognitive load
GOOD: "OAuth / Email+Password / SSO / Magic link" ← pick one, lower load

Protocol

Phase 1: Capture and Diagnose

Record the original requirement verbatim. Identify ambiguities:

  • What is unclear or underspecified?
  • What assumptions would need to be made?
  • What decisions are left to interpretation?

Phase 2: Iterative Clarification

Use AskUserQuestion to resolve ambiguities. Batch up to 4 related questions per call. Each option is a hypothesis about what the user means.

Cap: 5-8 total questions. Stop when all critical ambiguities are resolved, OR user indicates "good enough", OR cap reached.

Example AskUserQuestion call:

questions:
  - question: "Which authentication method should the login use?"
    header: "Auth method"
    options:
      - label: "Email + Password"
        description: "Traditional signup with email verification"
      - label: "OAuth (Google/GitHub)"
        description: "Delegated auth, no password management needed"
      - label: "Magic link"
        description: "Passwordless email-based login"
    multiSelect: false
  - question: "What should happen after registration?"
    header: "Post-signup"
    options:
      - label: "Immediate access"
        description: "User can use the app right away"
      - label: "Email verification first"
        description: "Must confirm email before access"
    multiSelect: false

Phase 3: Before/After Summary

Present the transformation:

markdown
## Requirement Clarification Summary

### Before (Original)
"{original request verbatim}"

### After (Clarified)
**Goal**: [precise description]
**Scope**: [included and excluded]
**Constraints**: [limitations, preferences]
**Success Criteria**: [how to know when done]

**Decisions Made**:
| Question | Decision |
|----------|----------|
| [ambiguity 1] | [chosen option] |

Phase 4: Save Option

Ask whether to save the clarified requirement to a file. Default location: requirements/ or project-appropriate directory.

Ambiguity Categories

Category Example Hypotheses
Scope All users / Admins only / Specific roles
Behavior Fail silently / Show error / Auto-retry
Interface REST API / GraphQL / CLI
Data JSON / CSV / Both
Constraints <100ms / <1s / No requirement
Priority Must-have / Nice-to-have / Future

Rules

  1. Hypotheses, not open questions: Every option is a plausible interpretation
  2. No assumptions: Ask, don't assume
  3. Preserve intent: Refine, don't redirect
  4. 5-8 questions max: Beyond this is fatigue
  5. Batch related questions: Up to 4 per AskUserQuestion call
  6. Track changes: Always show before/after

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

team-attention/plugins-for-claude-natives

dev-scan

개발 커뮤니티에서 기술 주제에 대한 다양한 의견 수집. "개발자 반응", "커뮤니티 의견", "developer reactions" 요청에 사용. Reddit, HN, Dev.to, Lobsters 등 종합.

692 85
Explore
team-attention/plugins-for-claude-natives

tech-decision

This skill should be used when the user asks to "기술 의사결정", "뭐 쓸지 고민", "A vs B", "비교 분석", "라이브러리 선택", "아키텍처 결정", "어떤 걸 써야 할지", "트레이드오프", "기술 선택", "구현 방식 고민", or needs deep analysis for technical decisions. Provides systematic multi-source research and synthesized recommendations.

692 85
Explore
team-attention/plugins-for-claude-natives

google-calendar

Google 캘린더 일정 조회/생성/수정/삭제. "오늘 일정", "이번 주 일정", "미팅 추가해줘" 요청에 사용. 여러 계정(work, personal) 통합 조회 지원.

692 85
Explore
team-attention/plugins-for-claude-natives

metamedium

This skill should be used when the user is building, planning, or strategizing and the key question is whether to optimize content (what) or change form (how/medium). Trigger on "내용 vs 형식", "content vs form", "metamedium", "형식을 바꿔볼까", "새로운 포맷", "관점 전환", "perspective shift", "다른 방법 없을까", "같은 방식이 안 먹혀", "diminishing returns". Applies Alan Kay's metamedium concept to surface form-level alternatives. For requirement clarification use vague; for strategy blind spots use unknown.

692 85
Explore
team-attention/plugins-for-claude-natives

unknown

This skill should be used when the user provides a strategy, plan, or decision document and wants to surface hidden assumptions and blind spots using the Known/Unknown 4-quadrant framework. Trigger on "known unknown", "4분면 분석", "blind spots", "뭘 놓치고 있지", "뭘 모르는지 모르겠어", "전략 점검", "전략 분석", "assumption check", "가정 점검", "quadrant analysis", "what am I missing". Strategy-level blind spot analysis with hypothesis-driven questioning. For requirement clarification use vague; for content-vs-form reframing use metamedium.

692 85
Explore
team-attention/plugins-for-claude-natives

session-wrap

This skill should be used when the user asks to "wrap up session", "end session", "session wrap", "/wrap", "document learnings", "what should I commit", or wants to analyze completed work before ending a coding session.

692 85
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results