Agent skill

translational-gap-analyzer

Assess translational gaps between preclinical models and human diseases to predict clinical failure risks

Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/other/other/translational-gap-analyzer

SKILL.md

Translational Gap Analyzer

ID: 209

Description

Assesses the "translational gap" between basic research models (such as mice, zebrafish, cell lines) and human diseases, providing early warning of clinical translation failure risks. This system helps researchers identify potential translational barriers in preclinical research and improve clinical trial success rates through multi-dimensional analysis.

Capabilities

  • Evaluates anatomical/physiological differences between models and humans
  • Analyzes pathological similarity of disease models
  • Identifies interspecies differences in molecular pathways
  • Evaluates pharmacokinetic differences
  • Provides early warning of clinical trial failure risk factors
  • Provides improvement recommendations to increase translation success rates

Usage

bash
# Full assessment report
python scripts/main.py --model <model_type> --disease <disease_name> --full

# Quick risk assessment
python scripts/main.py --model <model_type> --disease <disease_name> --quick

# Compare multiple models
python scripts/main.py --models mouse,rat,primate --disease <disease_name> --compare

# Specify focus areas
python scripts/main.py --model mouse --disease "Alzheimer's" --focus metabolism,immune

Arguments

Argument Description Required
--model Model type (mouse, rat, zebrafish, cell_line, organoid, primate) Yes (unless --models)
--models Multi-model comparison mode, comma-separated No
--disease Disease name or MeSH ID Yes
--focus Focus areas, comma-separated (anatomy, physiology, metabolism, immune, genetics, behavior) No
--full Generate full assessment report No
--quick Quick risk assessment mode No
--compare Multi-model comparison mode No
--output Output file path No
--format Output format (json, markdown, table) No

Example Output

json
{
  "model": "mouse",
  "disease": "Alzheimer's Disease",
  "overall_gap_score": 6.8,
  "risk_level": "HIGH",
  "dimensions": {
    "genetics": {"score": 8.5, "concerns": ["APOE4 differences", "Different tau pathology patterns"]},
    "physiology": {"score": 7.0, "concerns": ["Brain structure differences", "Lifespan differences"]},
    "metabolism": {"score": 6.5, "concerns": ["Significant drug metabolism differences"]},
    "immune": {"score": 5.5, "concerns": ["Microglia functional differences", "Different neuroinflammation patterns"]},
    "behavior": {"score": 6.0, "concerns": ["Limitations in cognitive assessment methods"]}
  },
  "clinical_failure_predictors": [
    "Immune-related mechanism research may not translate",
    "Drug clearance rate differences may lead to inappropriate dosing"
  ],
  "recommendations": [
    "Consider using humanized mouse models",
    "Add non-human primate validation experiments",
    "Focus on peripheral immune and central immune interactions"
  ]
}

Model Types

Common Models

Model Applicable Scenarios Typical Gaps
mouse Genetic manipulation, basic research Immune, metabolism, brain structure
rat Behavioral studies, cardiovascular Cognition, drug metabolism
zebrafish Development, high-throughput screening Anatomy, physiology
cell_line Molecular mechanisms Microenvironment, systemic
organoid Human-specific research Maturity, vascularization
primate Preclinical validation Cost, ethics

Gap Scoring System

  • 0-3: Low gap, good translation prospects
  • 4-6: Moderate gap, requires additional validation
  • 7-8: High gap, significant translation risks exist
  • 9-10: Extremely high gap, low translation likelihood

Dependencies

  • Python 3.8+
  • Built-in libraries: argparse, json, sys

Files

  • SKILL.md - This file
  • scripts/main.py - Main analysis script

Risk Assessment

Risk Indicator Assessment Level
Code Execution Python/R scripts executed locally Medium
Network Access No external API calls Low
File System Access Read input files, write output files Medium
Instruction Tampering Standard prompt guidelines Low
Data Exposure Output files saved to workspace Low

Security Checklist

  • No hardcoded credentials or API keys
  • No unauthorized file system access (../)
  • Output does not expose sensitive information
  • Prompt injection protections in place
  • Input file paths validated (no ../ traversal)
  • Output directory restricted to workspace
  • Script execution in sandboxed environment
  • Error messages sanitized (no stack traces exposed)
  • Dependencies audited

Prerequisites

bash
# Python dependencies
pip install -r requirements.txt

Evaluation Criteria

Success Metrics

  • Successfully executes main functionality
  • Output meets quality standards
  • Handles edge cases gracefully
  • Performance is acceptable

Test Cases

  1. Basic Functionality: Standard input → Expected output
  2. Edge Case: Invalid input → Graceful error handling
  3. Performance: Large dataset → Acceptable processing time

Lifecycle Status

  • Current Stage: Draft
  • Next Review Date: 2026-03-06
  • Known Issues: None
  • Planned Improvements:
    • Performance optimization
    • Additional feature support

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results