ReddRadar
Agent skill
trade-study
Structured skill for conducting engineering trade studies and concept selection
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/a5c-ai/babysitter/tree/main/library/specializations/domains/science/mechanical-engineering/skills/trade-study
Metadata
Additional technical details for this skill
- phase
- 7
- domain
- science
- category
- design-development
- priority
- medium
- specialization
- mechanical-engineering
- tools libraries
-
[ "Decision analysis tools", "MATLAB", "Spreadsheets" ]
SKILL.md
Trade Study Skill
Purpose
The Trade Study skill provides structured capabilities for conducting engineering trade studies and concept selection, enabling systematic evaluation of design alternatives against requirements.
Capabilities
- Trade study framework setup
- Evaluation criteria definition and weighting
- Concept generation support
- Pugh matrix implementation
- Quantitative scoring methods
- Sensitivity analysis
- Decision documentation
- Stakeholder consensus building
Usage Guidelines
Trade Study Framework
Trade Study Types
| Type | Application | Complexity |
|---|---|---|
| Screening | Eliminate non-viable options | Low |
| Pugh matrix | Comparative evaluation | Medium |
| Weighted scoring | Quantitative ranking | Medium |
| Multi-attribute utility | Complex decisions | High |
| Optimization | Parameter selection | High |
Process Overview
1. Define objectives and scope
2. Establish evaluation criteria
3. Generate alternatives
4. Collect data for each alternative
5. Score alternatives against criteria
6. Analyze results and sensitivity
7. Make recommendation
8. Document decision
Criteria Development
Criteria Categories
| Category | Example Criteria |
|---|---|
| Performance | Power output, efficiency, accuracy |
| Physical | Size, weight, volume |
| Cost | Development cost, unit cost, life cycle cost |
| Schedule | Development time, lead time |
| Risk | Technical risk, schedule risk, cost risk |
| Manufacturability | Complexity, process capability |
| Reliability | MTBF, failure modes, redundancy |
| Maintainability | Access, service intervals, spares |
Criteria Weighting
Methods for weight assignment:
1. Direct assignment
- Assign percentages directly
- Total must equal 100%
2. Pairwise comparison
- Compare each pair of criteria
- Calculate weights from preferences
3. Swing weighting
- Consider range of performance
- Assign weights based on swing importance
4. AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process)
- Structured pairwise comparison
- Consistency check included
Concept Generation
Brainstorming Guidelines
1. Define the function to be achieved
2. Generate alternatives without judgment
3. Consider:
- Prior art and benchmarks
- Different technologies
- Component variations
- Configuration options
4. Combine and refine ideas
5. Screen for feasibility
Concept Representation
| Method | Detail Level | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Sketch | Low | Initial brainstorm |
| Block diagram | Low-Medium | Functional layout |
| Layout drawing | Medium | Spatial arrangement |
| CAD model | High | Detailed evaluation |
Pugh Matrix Method
Matrix Setup
Pugh Matrix:
- Rows: Evaluation criteria
- Columns: Concept alternatives
- Datum: Baseline or best-known solution
- Scoring: + (better), - (worse), S (same)
| Criteria | Weight | Datum | Alt-A | Alt-B | Alt-C |
|----------|--------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
| Crit 1 | 0.30 | 0 | + | - | S |
| Crit 2 | 0.25 | 0 | S | + | + |
| Crit 3 | 0.20 | 0 | - | + | + |
| Crit 4 | 0.15 | 0 | + | S | - |
| Crit 5 | 0.10 | 0 | S | + | S |
Results Analysis
Calculate for each alternative:
- Sum of positives
- Sum of negatives
- Weighted sum of positives
- Weighted sum of negatives
- Net score
Use results to:
- Eliminate weak concepts
- Identify best features
- Create hybrid concepts
- Iterate evaluation
Weighted Scoring Method
Scoring Scale
Example 5-point scale:
5 = Excellent, exceeds requirements significantly
4 = Good, exceeds requirements
3 = Acceptable, meets requirements
2 = Marginal, partially meets requirements
1 = Poor, does not meet requirements
0 = Unacceptable, disqualifying
Or numerical scale tied to requirements:
Score = (Performance - Threshold) / (Goal - Threshold)
Weighted Score Calculation
Total Score = Sum(Weight_i x Score_i)
Example:
| Criteria | Weight | Alt-A Score | Alt-A Weighted |
|----------|--------|-------------|----------------|
| Crit 1 | 0.30 | 4 | 1.20 |
| Crit 2 | 0.25 | 3 | 0.75 |
| Crit 3 | 0.20 | 5 | 1.00 |
| Crit 4 | 0.15 | 3 | 0.45 |
| Crit 5 | 0.10 | 4 | 0.40 |
| Total | 1.00 | | 3.80 |
Sensitivity Analysis
Analysis Methods
1. Weight sensitivity
- Vary weights +/- 10-20%
- Identify crossover points
- Determine robust winner
2. Score sensitivity
- Vary scores +/- 1 point
- Consider uncertainty in data
- Identify close decisions
3. Tornado diagram
- Show impact of each factor
- Prioritize data improvement
Decision Documentation
Trade Study Report
Required sections:
1. Executive summary
2. Objectives and scope
3. Evaluation criteria and weights
4. Alternatives description
5. Data sources and assumptions
6. Scoring rationale
7. Results and analysis
8. Sensitivity analysis
9. Recommendation
10. Appendices (detailed data)
Process Integration
- ME-002: Conceptual Design Trade Study
Input Schema
{
"study_objective": "string",
"scope": {
"system": "string",
"decision_type": "concept|configuration|supplier|technology"
},
"requirements": "array of requirement references",
"alternatives": [
{
"name": "string",
"description": "string",
"data_sources": "array"
}
],
"stakeholders": "array of reviewers",
"constraints": {
"budget": "number",
"schedule": "string",
"must_meet": "array of requirements"
}
}
Output Schema
{
"trade_study_report": {
"document_number": "string",
"revision": "string"
},
"criteria": [
{
"name": "string",
"weight": "number",
"rationale": "string"
}
],
"results": {
"scoring_matrix": "2D array",
"weighted_scores": "array",
"ranking": "array"
},
"sensitivity_analysis": {
"robust_criteria": "array",
"sensitive_criteria": "array",
"crossover_points": "array"
},
"recommendation": {
"selected_alternative": "string",
"rationale": "string",
"risks": "array",
"next_steps": "array"
}
}
Best Practices
- Define clear objectives before starting
- Include diverse stakeholder perspectives
- Document all assumptions and data sources
- Use consistent scoring across alternatives
- Perform sensitivity analysis on close decisions
- Get stakeholder buy-in on recommendation
Integration Points
- Connects with Requirements Flowdown for evaluation criteria
- Feeds into CAD Modeling for selected concept
- Supports Design Review for decision documentation
- Integrates with Risk assessment for technical risks
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
a5c-ai/babysitter
gsd-tools
Central utility skill for GSD operations. Provides config parsing, slug generation, timestamps, path operations, and orchestrates calls to other specialized skills. Acts as the unified entry point that the original gsd-tools.cjs provided via its lib/ modules (commands, config, core, init).
a5c-ai/babysitter
model-profile-resolution
Resolve model profile (quality/balanced/budget) at orchestration start and map agents to specific models. Enables cost/quality tradeoffs by selecting appropriate AI models for each agent role.
a5c-ai/babysitter
verification-suite
Plan structure validation, phase completeness checks, reference integrity verification, and artifact existence confirmation. Provides the structured verification layer ensuring GSD artifacts are well-formed and complete.
a5c-ai/babysitter
state-management
STATE.md reading, writing, and field-level updates. Provides cross-session state persistence via .planning/STATE.md with structured fields for current task, completed phases, blockers, decisions, and quick tasks.
a5c-ai/babysitter
git-integration
Git commit patterns, formats, and conventions for GSD methodology. Provides atomic commits per task, structured commit messages, planning file commits, branch management, and milestone tag operations.
a5c-ai/babysitter
frontmatter-parsing
YAML frontmatter parsing and manipulation for .planning/ documents. Provides read, write, update, query, and validation operations on frontmatter blocks in GSD markdown artifacts.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?