Topic: claude-code
35,830 skills in this topic.
-
postgres-migrations
Comprehensive guide to PostgreSQL migrations - common errors, generated columns, full-text search, indexes, idempotent migrations, and best practices for database schema changes
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
prpm-development
Use when developing PRPM (Prompt Package Manager) - comprehensive knowledge base covering architecture, format conversion, package types, collections, quality standards, testing, and deployment
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
prpm-json-best-practices
Best practices for structuring prpm.json package manifests with required fields, tags, organization, multi-package management, enhanced file format, eager/lazy activation, and conversion hints
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
pulumi-troubleshooting
Comprehensive guide to troubleshooting Pulumi TypeScript errors, infrastructure issues, and best practices - covers common errors, Outputs handling, AWS Beanstalk deployment, and cost optimization
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
self-improving
Use when starting infrastructure, testing, deployment, or framework-specific tasks - automatically searches PRPM registry for relevant expertise packages and suggests installation to enhance capabilities for the current task
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
slash-command-builder
Use when creating, improving, or troubleshooting Claude Code slash commands. Expert guidance on command structure, arguments, frontmatter, tool permissions, and best practices for building effective custom commands.
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
testing-prpm-cli
Use when testing PRPM CLI commands locally - provides build, environment setup, execution workflow, contract testing to verify documented behavior matches implementation, and comprehensive cross-format conversion testing against local registry
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
thoroughness
Use when implementing complex multi-step tasks, fixing critical bugs, or when quality and completeness matter more than speed - ensures comprehensive implementation without shortcuts through systematic analysis, implementation, and verification phases
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
typescript-type-safety
Use when encountering TypeScript any types, type errors, or lax type checking - eliminates type holes and enforces strict type safety through proper interfaces, type guards, and module augmentation
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
osgrep-skill
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
prpm-development
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
multi-package-publish
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
ci-test-claude-skill
CI Test Claude Skill
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
ci-test-droid-skill
CI Test Factory Droid Skill
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
agents-md-skill
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
ci-test-codex-skill
CI Test Codex Skill
pr-pm/prpm 102
-
implement-change
Execute code changes from an implementation plan. Use when someone says "implement this", "build this", "code this", "start building", "let's implement", "execute the plan", "make the changes", "do the work", or has an approved implementation plan ready for coding. Takes implementation plans and produces working code, phase by phase with verification.
teambrilliant/dev-skills 3
-
implementation-planning
Create technical implementation plans and architecture designs. Use when someone needs a detailed technical approach before coding begins — "create a plan", "plan this ticket", "how should we implement this", "technical design", "architect this", "design the approach", "plan the migration", "refactor plan", "how should we structure this", or when shaped work or a groomed ticket needs a concrete implementation strategy with phases, file changes, and verification steps.
teambrilliant/dev-skills 3
-
loop-check
Assess what's needed to make feedback loops autonomous in a repo. Use when someone says "loop check", "what do I need to work autonomously", "check my feedback loops", "what's manual here", "what should I automate", "can an agent iterate here", or before starting work in an unfamiliar repo to understand what's missing for autonomous iteration. Also use when the user asks "what do you need to make this autonomous?" or describes a workflow they want to close the loop on. NOT for: full repo audits (use tap-audit), coding, test writing, or implementation.
teambrilliant/dev-skills 3
-
product-discovery
Validate whether a product idea is worth building before committing engineering investment. Use when someone says "should we build this", "validate this idea", "discovery", "run an experiment", "test this hypothesis", "what are the risks", "is this worth building", "feasibility check", "prototype plan", or when a team has a shaped feature or product idea and needs to assess risks and design experiments before building. Sits between product-thinker (should we?) and shaping-work (what exactly?) — this skill answers "will this actually work?" by identifying what you don't know, designing the cheapest way to find out, and defining evidence gates that justify (or kill) the investment. Also trigger when someone has a feature request and you sense high uncertainty — if the team is about to spend weeks building something nobody tested, this skill should intervene.
teambrilliant/dev-skills 3
-
product-primitives
Break down complex products, features, or systems into fundamental primitives and building blocks from a software creator's perspective. Use when starting a new application, designing a large feature, or needing to understand a complex system's moving parts before building. Trigger phrases: "break down X", "decompose this", "what are the primitives", "building blocks of Z", "map the architecture", "what are the moving parts", "analyze this system", or any situation where you need to identify the atomic, reusable capabilities that compose a system. Complements product-thinker (user perspective) with the builder's perspective (system-level connections).
teambrilliant/dev-skills 3
-
product-thinker
Use for product decisions, user behavior analysis, and UX evaluation. Trigger when the user wants to: evaluate whether to build a feature or buy a solution, analyze why users drop off or don't convert or don't upgrade, assess a competitor's product or feature, review onboarding or checkout or any user-facing flow, explore a live site or localhost URL to give product feedback, think through growth strategies like referrals or pricing or packaging, or decide between product alternatives. The core signal is the user asking "should we?" or "is it worth?" or "why are users?" or "what do you think about [product/feature/flow]?" or asking you to look at a product and assess it. Also use alongside shaping-work when the user needs product thinking before defining work. NOT for: writing/fixing code, test authoring, PR review, database operations, CI/CD, or decomposing PRDs into tickets.
teambrilliant/dev-skills 3
-
qa-test
Browser-based QA verification after any implementation. Use when someone says "QA this", "test this in browser", "verify the feature", "qa test", "browser test", or after completing an /implement-change to verify acceptance criteria in a real browser. Opens Chrome via MCP, exercises each acceptance criterion, verifies via DOM snapshots, and reports pass/fail. The "closer" for every implementation — proof it works, not just that tests pass.
teambrilliant/dev-skills 3
-
shaping-work
Shape rough ideas into clear, actionable work definitions. Use this skill whenever someone has an unstructured idea that needs to become a concrete work definition — feature requests, bug reports, PRDs, customer feedback, Slack threads, stakeholder asks, or vague "we should do X" statements. Trigger phrases include "shape this", "scope this", "write a PRD", "define this work", "turn this into a ticket", "flesh this out", "spec this out", "what should we build for X", "I have an idea for...", or any rough input that needs structure before implementation can begin.
teambrilliant/dev-skills 3