Agent skill
tolerance-stackup
Skill for dimensional tolerance analysis and stack-up calculations
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/a5c-ai/babysitter/tree/main/library/specializations/domains/science/mechanical-engineering/skills/tolerance-stackup
Metadata
Additional technical details for this skill
- phase
- 8
- domain
- science
- category
- design-development
- priority
- medium
- specialization
- mechanical-engineering
- tools libraries
-
[ "CETOL 6 Sigma", "3DCS", "VSA", "Excel" ]
SKILL.md
Tolerance Stack-Up Analysis Skill
Purpose
The Tolerance Stack-Up Analysis skill provides capabilities for dimensional tolerance analysis and stack-up calculations, enabling verification of assembly fits and functional requirements through systematic tolerance chain analysis.
Capabilities
- Worst-case tolerance analysis
- Statistical (RSS) tolerance analysis
- Monte Carlo tolerance simulation
- GD&T-based stack-up analysis
- Assembly feasibility verification
- Tolerance allocation optimization
- CETOL/3DCS integration
- Stack-up report generation
Usage Guidelines
Tolerance Analysis Methods
Method Comparison
| Method | Approach | Application | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Worst-case | All tolerances at limit | Safety critical | Maximum variation |
| RSS | Statistical combination | High volume production | Probable variation |
| Monte Carlo | Random sampling | Complex assemblies | Distribution |
| 6-Sigma | Process capability | Quality control | Defect rate |
Worst-Case Analysis
Linear Stack-Up
Gap = Nominal gap +/- sum of all tolerances
For a simple assembly:
Gap_min = Nominal - sum(all positive contributors)
Gap_max = Nominal + sum(all negative contributors)
Or using sensitivity:
Gap = sum(ai * xi)
Tolerance = sum(|ai| * ti)
Where:
ai = sensitivity coefficient (+1 or -1)
xi = nominal dimension
ti = tolerance on dimension i
Direction Convention
Define positive direction:
- Dimensions adding to gap: positive (+1)
- Dimensions subtracting from gap: negative (-1)
Example (shaft in hole):
Gap = Hole_dia - Shaft_dia
Hole: +1 (increases gap)
Shaft: -1 (decreases gap)
Statistical Analysis
Root Sum Square (RSS)
Statistical tolerance (RSS):
T_rss = sqrt(sum(ti^2))
For unequal distributions (weighted):
T_rss = sqrt(sum((ai * ti)^2))
Assumes:
- Normal distribution
- Independent variables
- Process centered at nominal
Process Capability
Cp = (USL - LSL) / (6 * sigma)
Cpk = min((USL - mean)/(3*sigma), (mean - LSL)/(3*sigma))
For 6-sigma quality:
Cpk >= 2.0
PPM defective < 3.4
For tolerance analysis:
sigma = T / (3 * k)
Where k depends on desired Cpk:
k = 3 for Cpk = 1.0
k = 4 for Cpk = 1.33
k = 6 for Cpk = 2.0
Monte Carlo Simulation
Simulation Process
1. Define distribution for each dimension
- Normal: mean, sigma
- Uniform: min, max
- Skewed: appropriate parameters
2. Generate random samples (N = 10,000+)
3. Calculate assembly result for each sample
4. Analyze output distribution
5. Determine percent out-of-spec
Distribution Selection
| Scenario | Distribution | Parameters |
|---|---|---|
| Machined feature | Normal | Nominal, T/6 (Cpk=2) |
| Purchased part | Normal/Uniform | Per vendor data |
| Press fit | Truncated normal | Limits at tolerance |
| Unknown process | Uniform | Min, max |
GD&T in Stack-Ups
Including GD&T
Position tolerance contribution:
Dia_positional / 2 = linear contribution (per direction)
For MMC position:
Contribution = (Position_tol + Bonus_tol) / 2
Bonus tolerance:
Bonus = |Actual_size - MMC_size|
Datum Reference Frame
Stack-up must follow datum precedence:
1. Establish primary datum (constrains normal)
2. Establish secondary datum (constrains one rotation)
3. Establish tertiary datum (constrains remaining DOF)
Feature control frame specifies:
|Position|0.5 MMC|A|B|C|
Analysis Process
Stack-Up Procedure
-
Define the Problem
- What gap/clearance is being analyzed?
- What is the acceptance criterion?
- What components are involved?
-
Create the Loop Diagram
- Start at one surface
- Follow chain to other surface
- Identify all contributors
- Assign directions
-
Gather Data
- Nominal dimensions
- Tolerances (bilateral, unilateral)
- Process capabilities
- Distribution data
-
Perform Calculation
- Calculate nominal gap
- Calculate worst-case variation
- Calculate statistical variation
- Compare to requirement
-
Document Results
- Stack-up spreadsheet
- Loop diagram
- Conclusions and recommendations
Tolerance Allocation
Optimization Strategies
If tolerance too tight:
1. Increase gap nominal (if possible)
2. Tighten critical dimension tolerances
3. Add adjustment or shim
4. Change assembly method
5. Accept higher defect rate
If tolerance too loose:
1. Relax non-critical tolerances
2. Reduce manufacturing cost
Cost-Tolerance Relationship
Approximate relationship:
Cost ~ 1 / Tolerance^n
Where n ~ 1.5 to 2 for machining
Tighten tolerances on:
- Lower cost features
- Higher sensitivity contributors
Process Integration
- ME-004: GD&T Specification and Drawing Creation
Input Schema
{
"analysis_name": "string",
"requirement": {
"type": "gap|clearance|interference|alignment",
"nominal": "number",
"min": "number",
"max": "number"
},
"contributors": [
{
"name": "string",
"nominal": "number",
"tolerance": "number (bilateral half)",
"direction": "+1|-1",
"distribution": "normal|uniform",
"cpk": "number (if normal)"
}
],
"method": "worst_case|rss|monte_carlo|all"
}
Output Schema
{
"analysis_summary": {
"requirement": {
"min": "number",
"max": "number"
},
"nominal_result": "number"
},
"worst_case": {
"min_result": "number",
"max_result": "number",
"pass_fail": "pass|fail",
"margin": "number"
},
"statistical": {
"mean": "number",
"sigma": "number",
"min_3sigma": "number",
"max_3sigma": "number",
"percent_out_of_spec": "number",
"cpk": "number"
},
"monte_carlo": {
"mean": "number",
"sigma": "number",
"min_observed": "number",
"max_observed": "number",
"percent_out_of_spec": "number",
"histogram": "data reference"
},
"sensitivity_ranking": [
{
"contributor": "string",
"sensitivity": "number",
"percent_contribution": "number"
}
],
"recommendations": "array"
}
Best Practices
- Define acceptance criterion before analysis
- Include all contributors in the chain
- Verify dimensions from actual drawings
- Use realistic process capabilities
- Document assumptions and simplifications
- Perform sensitivity analysis on tight results
Integration Points
- Connects with GD&T Drawing for tolerance inputs
- Feeds into DFM Review for manufacturing feasibility
- Supports FAI Inspection for verification
- Integrates with Design Review for approval
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
gsd-tools
Central utility skill for GSD operations. Provides config parsing, slug generation, timestamps, path operations, and orchestrates calls to other specialized skills. Acts as the unified entry point that the original gsd-tools.cjs provided via its lib/ modules (commands, config, core, init).
model-profile-resolution
Resolve model profile (quality/balanced/budget) at orchestration start and map agents to specific models. Enables cost/quality tradeoffs by selecting appropriate AI models for each agent role.
verification-suite
Plan structure validation, phase completeness checks, reference integrity verification, and artifact existence confirmation. Provides the structured verification layer ensuring GSD artifacts are well-formed and complete.
state-management
STATE.md reading, writing, and field-level updates. Provides cross-session state persistence via .planning/STATE.md with structured fields for current task, completed phases, blockers, decisions, and quick tasks.
git-integration
Git commit patterns, formats, and conventions for GSD methodology. Provides atomic commits per task, structured commit messages, planning file commits, branch management, and milestone tag operations.
frontmatter-parsing
YAML frontmatter parsing and manipulation for .planning/ documents. Provides read, write, update, query, and validation operations on frontmatter blocks in GSD markdown artifacts.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?