ReddRadar
Agent skill
thesis-markdown-aligner
在 Markdown 中间层统一毕业论文的主线、术语、符号、指标、图表口径与章节边界，让整篇论文先在中间层收敛成“一篇论文”。 **Trigger**: markdown 对齐, thesis markdown align, 术语统一, 符号统一, 指标统一, 章节归并. **Use when**: 各章已经初步重构，但整篇论文仍有术语漂移、指标口径不一致、章节边界混乱或像多篇 paper 拼接。 **Skip if**: 章节角色还没定，或当前只是在局部修一章。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里回写 tex；先收敛中间层，再进入交付层。
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills/tree/main/.codex/skills/thesis-markdown-aligner
SKILL.md
Thesis Markdown Aligner
Inputs
- 重构后的章节 Markdown
codex_md/question_list.md
Outputs
codex_md/00_thesis_outline.mdcodex_md/terminology_glossary.mdcodex_md/symbol_metric_table.md- 证据缺口清单（可并入
missing_info.md或单独文件）
Load Order
Always read:
references/overview.mdreferences/alignment_axes.md
Machine-readable contract:
assets/markdown_alignment_contract.json
Workflow
- 统一主线与章节边界
- 统一术语、缩写、符号、指标
- 识别重复内容与应上移/下沉的内容
- 标记尚未闭合的证据缺口
Key Rule
如果各章还不能共享同一套术语、符号和指标口径，就不要进入 tex-writeback。
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
thesis-compile-review
对中文毕业论文进行编译、warning 分级、模板模式检查、数据与引用复查，并把问题回写成可继续迭代的 review checklist。 **Trigger**: 毕业论文编译检查, thesis compile review, warning 分级, 终稿复查, main.pdf 检查. **Use when**: 论文已经回写到 TeX 交付层，需要确认是否真正达到“可提交”的质量，而不是只做到能编译。 **Skip if**: 还处于中间层重构阶段，`chapters/*.tex` 尚未形成稳定交付稿。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里重构章节主线；如果发现结构问题，明确回退到上游修复。
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
front-matter-writer
Write the survey's front matter files (Abstract, Introduction, Related Work, Discussion, Conclusion) in paper voice, with high citation density and a single evidence-policy paragraph. **Trigger**: front matter writer, introduction writer, related work writer, abstract writer, discussion writer, conclusion writer, 引言, 相关工作, 摘要, 讨论, 结论. **Use when**: you are in C5 (prose allowed) and need the paper-like shell to stop the draft reading like stitched subsections. **Skip if**: `Approve C2` is missing in `DECISIONS.md`, or `citations/ref.bib` is missing. **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: no invented facts/citations; no pipeline jargon in final prose; no repeated evidence disclaimers; only use keys present in `citations/ref.bib`.
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
thesis-question-list
维护中文毕业论文的 `codex_md/question_list.md`：把本轮问题、边界、优先级、协作方案和验收口径结构化，作为整条 thesis pipeline 的控制面。 **Trigger**: 毕业论文问题清单, thesis question list, 论文修改清单, 本轮目标, 结构问题梳理, review问题整理. **Use when**: 你已经有一批材料或上一轮 review 结果，需要明确这一轮到底修什么、不修什么，并给后续重构与编译复查提供统一入口。 **Skip if**: 当前只是在做一次性局部措辞修改，且没有形成新一轮结构/证据/编译问题。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里写正文；不把问题单写成长篇散文；每条问题必须可执行、可验收。
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
novelty-matrix
Create a novelty/prior-work matrix comparing the submission’s contributions against related work (overlaps vs deltas). **Trigger**: novelty matrix, prior-work matrix, overlap/delta, 相关工作对比, 新颖性矩阵. **Use when**: peer review 中评估 novelty/positioning，需要把贡献与相关工作逐项对齐并写出差异点证据。 **Skip if**: 缺少 claims（先跑 `claims-extractor`）或你不打算做新颖性定位分析。 **Network**: none (retrieval of additional related work is out-of-scope unless provided). **Guardrail**: 明确 overlap 与 delta；尽量给出可追溯证据来源（来自稿件/引用/作者陈述）。
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
protocol-writer
Write a systematic review protocol into `output/PROTOCOL.md` (databases, queries, inclusion/exclusion, time window, extraction fields). **Trigger**: protocol, PRISMA, systematic review, inclusion/exclusion, 检索式, 纳入排除. **Use when**: systematic review pipeline 的起点（C1），需要先锁定 protocol 再开始 screening/extraction。 **Skip if**: 不是做 systematic review（或 protocol 已经锁定且不允许修改）。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: protocol 必须包含可执行的检索与筛选规则；需要 HUMAN 签字后才能进入 screening。
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
rubric-writer
Write a rubric-based peer review report (`output/REVIEW.md`) using extracted claims and evidence gaps (novelty/soundness/clarity/impact). **Trigger**: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md. **Use when**: peer-review pipeline 的最后阶段（C3），已有 `output/CLAIMS.md` + `output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md`（以及可选 novelty matrix）。 **Skip if**: 上游产物未就绪（claims/evidence gaps 缺失）或你不打算输出完整审稿报告。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 给可执行建议（actionable feedback），并覆盖 novelty/soundness/clarity/impact；避免泛泛而谈。
Didn't find tool you were looking for?