┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. VALIDATE: Check context and guidance type             │
│ 2. ANALYZE: Understand leadership challenge              │
│ 3. FRAMEWORK: Select appropriate framework               │
│ 4. APPLY: Apply framework to context                     │
│ 5. SYNTHESIZE: Generate recommendations                  │
│ 6. STRUCTURE: Format output appropriately                │
│ 7. DELIVER: Return guidance with action items            │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

log_points:
  - event: guidance_requested
    level: info
    data: [guidance_type, decision_stakes]
  - event: framework_applied
    level: info
    data: [framework_name, context_type]
  - event: guidance_delivered
    level: info
    data: [action_items_count, confidence]

metrics:
  - name: guidance_requests
    type: counter
    labels: [guidance_type]
  - name: response_time_ms
    type: histogram
  - name: action_items_generated
    type: counter

test_cases:
  - name: "Architecture review"
    input:
      context: "Review microservices migration proposal"
      guidance_type: "review"
      decision_stakes: "high"
    expected:
      has_checklist: true
      has_findings: true
      has_recommendation: true

  - name: "Mentoring guidance"
    input:
      context: "Senior engineer wants to grow into tech lead"
      guidance_type: "mentoring"
    expected:
      has_grow_framework: true
      has_action_items: true
      has_timeline: true

  - name: "Decision facilitation"
    input:
      context: "Team split on REST vs GraphQL"
      guidance_type: "decision"
    expected:
      has_rapid_model: true
      has_decision_matrix: true
      has_recommendation: true

□ Is the leadership challenge clear?
□ Is the appropriate framework selected?
□ Are stakeholders identified?
□ Are decision criteria explicit?
□ Are action items specific and actionable?