Agent skill
taxonomy-builder
Build a 2+ level taxonomy (`outline/taxonomy.yml`) from a core paper set and scope constraints, with short descriptions per node. **Trigger**: taxonomy, taxonomy builder, 分类, 主题树, taxonomy.yml. **Use when**: survey/snapshot 的结构阶段(NO PROSE),已有 `papers/core_set.csv`,需要生成可映射且读者友好的主题结构。 **Skip if**: 已经有批准过且可映射的 taxonomy(不要无意义重构)。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 避免泛化占位桶;保持 2+ 层且每节点有具体描述。
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills/tree/main/.codex/skills/taxonomy-builder
SKILL.md
Taxonomy Builder (router, compatibility mode)
Build outline/taxonomy.yml from papers/core_set.csv.
P0 compatibility note:
- The output contract stays the same (
outline/taxonomy.yml, YAML list, >=2 levels, concrete descriptions). - Curated domain taxonomies now live in
assets/domain_packs/*.yamlinstead of Python prose. scripts/run.pystays a deterministic scaffold/helper: detect domain pack -> load pack when available -> otherwise fall back to the generic builder.
Load Order
references/overview.mdreferences/taxonomy_principles.md- If a domain pack applies, read its
references/domain_pack_<domain>.mdandassets/domain_packs/<domain>.yaml - Otherwise read
references/archetypes_generic.md - Calibrate naming/description quality with
references/examples_good.mdandreferences/examples_bad.md
Current compatibility packs:
llm_agentsgen_imageembodied_ai
Inputs
papers/core_set.csv(required)- Optional:
papers/papers_dedup.jsonl - Optional:
DECISIONS.md,GOAL.md,queries.md
Outputs
outline/taxonomy.yml
Asset contract
assets/taxonomy_schema.json: machine-readable shape for domain packs / output expectationsassets/domain_packs/*.yaml: compatibility domain packs for supported domains
Script role
Use scripts/run.py only for deterministic help:
- never overwrite non-placeholder user taxonomy
- preserve current CLI flags / output path
- load supported domain taxonomies from assets instead of hard-coded Python prose
- keep the generic fallback builder for non-packed domains
When to refine manually
Refine the generated taxonomy before marking the unit DONE if:
- top-level buckets feel like keyword clusters instead of chapter-level questions
- leaf names are generic (
Overview,Benchmarks,Open Problems,Misc) - descriptions lack scope cues or representative paper anchors
- domain detection chose the wrong pack
Quick start
python .codex/skills/taxonomy-builder/scripts/run.py --helppython .codex/skills/taxonomy-builder/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace_dir>
Execution notes
When running in compatibility mode, scripts/run.py currently reads:
papers/core_set.csvas the required corpus inputpapers/papers_dedup.jsonlwhen present for extra title/abstract signalsGOAL.md,queries.md, andDECISIONS.mdas optional domain/profile hints during pack selection
Script
Quick Start
python .codex/skills/taxonomy-builder/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace_dir>
All Options
--workspace <dir>--top-k <int>--min-freq <int>--unit-id <id>--inputs <a;b;...>--outputs <a;b;...>--checkpoint <C*>
Examples
python .codex/skills/taxonomy-builder/scripts/run.py --workspace workspaces/<ws>
Troubleshooting
- If the wrong domain pack is chosen, inspect
GOAL.md,queries.md, and the packdetectrules before changing Python. - If
outline/taxonomy.ymlalready contains a real non-placeholder taxonomy, the script intentionally returns without overwriting it. - If no pack matches, the script falls back to the generic builder.
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
thesis-compile-review
对中文毕业论文进行编译、warning 分级、模板模式检查、数据与引用复查,并把问题回写成可继续迭代的 review checklist。 **Trigger**: 毕业论文编译检查, thesis compile review, warning 分级, 终稿复查, main.pdf 检查. **Use when**: 论文已经回写到 TeX 交付层,需要确认是否真正达到“可提交”的质量,而不是只做到能编译。 **Skip if**: 还处于中间层重构阶段,`chapters/*.tex` 尚未形成稳定交付稿。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里重构章节主线;如果发现结构问题,明确回退到上游修复。
front-matter-writer
Write the survey's front matter files (Abstract, Introduction, Related Work, Discussion, Conclusion) in paper voice, with high citation density and a single evidence-policy paragraph. **Trigger**: front matter writer, introduction writer, related work writer, abstract writer, discussion writer, conclusion writer, 引言, 相关工作, 摘要, 讨论, 结论. **Use when**: you are in C5 (prose allowed) and need the paper-like shell to stop the draft reading like stitched subsections. **Skip if**: `Approve C2` is missing in `DECISIONS.md`, or `citations/ref.bib` is missing. **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: no invented facts/citations; no pipeline jargon in final prose; no repeated evidence disclaimers; only use keys present in `citations/ref.bib`.
thesis-question-list
维护中文毕业论文的 `codex_md/question_list.md`:把本轮问题、边界、优先级、协作方案和验收口径结构化,作为整条 thesis pipeline 的控制面。 **Trigger**: 毕业论文问题清单, thesis question list, 论文修改清单, 本轮目标, 结构问题梳理, review问题整理. **Use when**: 你已经有一批材料或上一轮 review 结果,需要明确这一轮到底修什么、不修什么,并给后续重构与编译复查提供统一入口。 **Skip if**: 当前只是在做一次性局部措辞修改,且没有形成新一轮结构/证据/编译问题。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里写正文;不把问题单写成长篇散文;每条问题必须可执行、可验收。
novelty-matrix
Create a novelty/prior-work matrix comparing the submission’s contributions against related work (overlaps vs deltas). **Trigger**: novelty matrix, prior-work matrix, overlap/delta, 相关工作对比, 新颖性矩阵. **Use when**: peer review 中评估 novelty/positioning,需要把贡献与相关工作逐项对齐并写出差异点证据。 **Skip if**: 缺少 claims(先跑 `claims-extractor`)或你不打算做新颖性定位分析。 **Network**: none (retrieval of additional related work is out-of-scope unless provided). **Guardrail**: 明确 overlap 与 delta;尽量给出可追溯证据来源(来自稿件/引用/作者陈述)。
protocol-writer
Write a systematic review protocol into `output/PROTOCOL.md` (databases, queries, inclusion/exclusion, time window, extraction fields). **Trigger**: protocol, PRISMA, systematic review, inclusion/exclusion, 检索式, 纳入排除. **Use when**: systematic review pipeline 的起点(C1),需要先锁定 protocol 再开始 screening/extraction。 **Skip if**: 不是做 systematic review(或 protocol 已经锁定且不允许修改)。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: protocol 必须包含可执行的检索与筛选规则;需要 HUMAN 签字后才能进入 screening。
rubric-writer
Write a rubric-based peer review report (`output/REVIEW.md`) using extracted claims and evidence gaps (novelty/soundness/clarity/impact). **Trigger**: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md. **Use when**: peer-review pipeline 的最后阶段(C3),已有 `output/CLAIMS.md` + `output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md`(以及可选 novelty matrix)。 **Skip if**: 上游产物未就绪(claims/evidence gaps 缺失)或你不打算输出完整审稿报告。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 给可执行建议(actionable feedback),并覆盖 novelty/soundness/clarity/impact;避免泛泛而谈。
Didn't find tool you were looking for?