Agent skill

survey-visuals

Draft non-prose visuals artifacts (timeline, figure specs) for a survey, grounded in evidence and using citation keys from `citations/ref.bib`. **Trigger**: survey visuals, timeline, figures, visuals, 图表, 时间线, figure spec. **Use when**: survey 的 C4(NO PROSE),已有 outline + claim/evidence + citations,需要先把时间线/图规格落盘。 **Skip if**: 你只关心正文(可跳过);或缺少 `citations/ref.bib`。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: NO PROSE;产物必须具体且可核对(含 citations),禁止遗留 TODO/SCAFFOLD。

Stars 377
Forks 25

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills/tree/main/.codex/skills/survey-visuals

SKILL.md

Survey Visuals (timeline + figure specs; NO PROSE)

This skill creates non-prose artifacts that make the writing stage less template-y:

  • timeline / evolution bullets
  • figure specs (what to draw, why it matters, what papers support it)

Load Order

Always read:

  • references/overview.md
  • references/figure_archetypes.md

Read by task:

  • references/timeline_patterns.md when building timeline milestones

Machine-readable assets:

  • assets/figure_templates.yaml — figure archetype specifications (extensible without code changes)

Script Boundary

Use scripts/run.py only for:

  • deterministic assembly of timeline bullets from paper_notes + bibkeys
  • table generation from outline + mapping
  • figure spec skeleton generation using assets/figure_templates.yaml

Do not treat run.py as the place for:

  • hardcoded figure descriptions or narratives
  • milestone selection heuristics that should be inspectable from references

Tables are handled by dedicated table skills:

  • table-schema -> outline/table_schema.md
  • table-filler -> outline/tables_index.md (internal index)
  • appendix-table-writer -> outline/tables_appendix.md (reader-facing Appendix tables)

Inputs

  • outline/outline.yml
  • outline/claim_evidence_matrix.md
  • papers/paper_notes.jsonl
  • citations/ref.bib

Outputs

  • outline/timeline.md
  • outline/figures.md

Workflow inputs (explicit)

  • Use outline/outline.yml + outline/claim_evidence_matrix.md to decide what to visualize.
  • Use papers/paper_notes.jsonl for year/milestone candidates.
  • Use only citation keys from citations/ref.bib.

Workflow (heuristic)

  1. Read the outline + claim-evidence matrix and pick recurring comparison axes.
  2. Timeline (outline/timeline.md):
    • Write year -> key milestone bullets (aim for breadth and citations).
  3. Figures (outline/figures.md):
    • Write 2-4 figure specs that a human could draw:
      • purpose (what insight this figure communicates)
      • required elements (boxes/arrows/axes)
      • what papers support each element (cite keys)
  4. Use only citation keys present in citations/ref.bib.

Quality checklist

  • No TODO and no <!-- SCAFFOLD ... --> markers remain in the outputs.
  • outline/timeline.md contains >=8 year bullets and each bullet has >=1 citation marker [@...].
  • outline/figures.md contains >=2 figure specs and each mentions at least one supporting citation.

Helper script (optional)

Quick Start

  • python .codex/skills/survey-visuals/scripts/run.py --help
  • python .codex/skills/survey-visuals/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace_dir>

All Options

  • --workspace <workspace_dir> (required)
  • --unit-id <id> (optional; used only for runner bookkeeping)
  • --inputs <a;b;c> (optional; defaults to the four Inputs listed above)
  • --outputs <timeline_rel;figures_rel> (optional; defaults to outline/timeline.md;outline/figures.md)
  • --checkpoint <C#> (optional; ignored by the helper)

Examples

  • Generate timeline + figures with defaults:

    python .codex/skills/survey-visuals/scripts/run.py --workspace workspaces/<ws>

  • Generate to custom output paths:

    python .codex/skills/survey-visuals/scripts/run.py --workspace workspaces/<ws> --outputs outline/timeline.md;outline/figures.md

Notes

  • The helper is intentionally minimal and never overwrites non-placeholder artifacts.
  • In strict mode it blocks only if placeholder markers remain (and if minimum timeline/figure requirements are not met).

Troubleshooting

Issue: timeline is thin or citation-free

Fix:

  • Prefer fewer, higher-signal milestones, but ensure each bullet has >=1 [@...].
  • Route upstream if notes are thin: strengthen paper-notes / evidence-draft rather than padding.

Issue: figure specs read like prose

Fix:

  • Keep specs as draw-instructions: purpose + elements + what each element is supported by (cite keys).
  • Move narrative explanation into the main text; this file should stay non-prose.

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

thesis-compile-review

对中文毕业论文进行编译、warning 分级、模板模式检查、数据与引用复查,并把问题回写成可继续迭代的 review checklist。 **Trigger**: 毕业论文编译检查, thesis compile review, warning 分级, 终稿复查, main.pdf 检查. **Use when**: 论文已经回写到 TeX 交付层,需要确认是否真正达到“可提交”的质量,而不是只做到能编译。 **Skip if**: 还处于中间层重构阶段,`chapters/*.tex` 尚未形成稳定交付稿。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里重构章节主线;如果发现结构问题,明确回退到上游修复。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

front-matter-writer

Write the survey's front matter files (Abstract, Introduction, Related Work, Discussion, Conclusion) in paper voice, with high citation density and a single evidence-policy paragraph. **Trigger**: front matter writer, introduction writer, related work writer, abstract writer, discussion writer, conclusion writer, 引言, 相关工作, 摘要, 讨论, 结论. **Use when**: you are in C5 (prose allowed) and need the paper-like shell to stop the draft reading like stitched subsections. **Skip if**: `Approve C2` is missing in `DECISIONS.md`, or `citations/ref.bib` is missing. **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: no invented facts/citations; no pipeline jargon in final prose; no repeated evidence disclaimers; only use keys present in `citations/ref.bib`.

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

thesis-question-list

维护中文毕业论文的 `codex_md/question_list.md`:把本轮问题、边界、优先级、协作方案和验收口径结构化,作为整条 thesis pipeline 的控制面。 **Trigger**: 毕业论文问题清单, thesis question list, 论文修改清单, 本轮目标, 结构问题梳理, review问题整理. **Use when**: 你已经有一批材料或上一轮 review 结果,需要明确这一轮到底修什么、不修什么,并给后续重构与编译复查提供统一入口。 **Skip if**: 当前只是在做一次性局部措辞修改,且没有形成新一轮结构/证据/编译问题。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里写正文;不把问题单写成长篇散文;每条问题必须可执行、可验收。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

novelty-matrix

Create a novelty/prior-work matrix comparing the submission’s contributions against related work (overlaps vs deltas). **Trigger**: novelty matrix, prior-work matrix, overlap/delta, 相关工作对比, 新颖性矩阵. **Use when**: peer review 中评估 novelty/positioning,需要把贡献与相关工作逐项对齐并写出差异点证据。 **Skip if**: 缺少 claims(先跑 `claims-extractor`)或你不打算做新颖性定位分析。 **Network**: none (retrieval of additional related work is out-of-scope unless provided). **Guardrail**: 明确 overlap 与 delta;尽量给出可追溯证据来源(来自稿件/引用/作者陈述)。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

protocol-writer

Write a systematic review protocol into `output/PROTOCOL.md` (databases, queries, inclusion/exclusion, time window, extraction fields). **Trigger**: protocol, PRISMA, systematic review, inclusion/exclusion, 检索式, 纳入排除. **Use when**: systematic review pipeline 的起点(C1),需要先锁定 protocol 再开始 screening/extraction。 **Skip if**: 不是做 systematic review(或 protocol 已经锁定且不允许修改)。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: protocol 必须包含可执行的检索与筛选规则;需要 HUMAN 签字后才能进入 screening。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

rubric-writer

Write a rubric-based peer review report (`output/REVIEW.md`) using extracted claims and evidence gaps (novelty/soundness/clarity/impact). **Trigger**: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md. **Use when**: peer-review pipeline 的最后阶段(C3),已有 `output/CLAIMS.md` + `output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md`(以及可选 novelty matrix)。 **Skip if**: 上游产物未就绪(claims/evidence gaps 缺失)或你不打算输出完整审稿报告。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 给可执行建议(actionable feedback),并覆盖 novelty/soundness/clarity/impact;避免泛泛而谈。

377 25
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results