Agent skill

split-component

Esta skill debe usarse cuando el usuario pide "dividir componente", "separar componente", "split component", "extraer componentes", "componente muy grande", "refactorizar componente grande", "break down component", "este archivo tiene muchas responsabilidades", o menciona que un archivo React tiene demasiado codigo, demasiado estado, o demasiada logica mezclada con UI. Analiza un componente React y lo divide en piezas mas manejables siguiendo el patron smart/dumb components.

Stars 1
Forks 0

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/DieGopherLT/dotclaudefiles/tree/main/plugins/react-dev/skills/split-component

SKILL.md

Split React Component

You receive a single React component file to analyze and split into smaller, focused pieces. The goal is to separate concerns: business logic goes into custom hooks, repetitive or large UI blocks become presentation components.

Step 1: Analyze the component

Read the file at $ARGUMENTS, then run an LSP-driven analysis pipeline. LSP provides semantic understanding -- it does not guess, it knows. Use it as the primary source of truth.

1.1 Symbol map

Run documentSymbol on the target file to get every symbol: functions, variables, types, interfaces. This is the skeleton of the component -- the full list of what exists and where.

1.2 Type and signature inspection

For each symbol returned in 1.1, run hover to get its type signature. This reveals:

  • Which variables are state (useState returns [T, Dispatch<SetStateAction<T>>])
  • Which are memoized values (useMemo return types)
  • Which are callbacks (useCallback signatures)
  • Prop types and their shape
  • Return types of custom hooks and helper functions

1.3 Internal dependency graph

For each function, handler, and hook call identified in 1.1-1.2:

  • Run outgoingCalls to map what each function calls internally. This reveals which helpers, hooks, and API calls are tightly coupled.
  • Run findReferences on state variables and handlers to identify which JSX sections consume them. This determines what moves together during extraction.

1.4 External dependency check

For imported symbols (API clients, utilities, types from other modules):

  • Run goToDefinition to confirm where they live.
  • Run findReferences scoped to the target file to see how many places use each import. Imports used in only one extracted piece can move with it cleanly.

1.5 Synthesis

With the LSP data collected, build a split plan identifying:

  • Hook candidates: clusters of state + effects + handlers that outgoingCalls and findReferences show are cohesive (they reference each other but not the rest).
  • Component candidates: JSX blocks inside loops, conditional sections, or large standalone sections where findReferences shows they depend on a narrow set of props/state.
  • Shared dependencies: symbols referenced by multiple extraction candidates -- these stay in the parent or get lifted.

Present findings to the user as a short summary with the proposed split plan. Use AskUserQuestion to confirm before making changes.

Step 2: Determine extraction strategy

The file's location determines how to organize the new files.

Domain context (component lives inside a module)

When the component is inside a domain directory (e.g., src/modules/orders/components/OrderDetail.tsx), add new files as siblings within that domain:

modules/orders/
  components/
    OrderDetail.tsx            <- refactored, now lean
    OrderSummaryCard.tsx       <- extracted presentation component
  hooks/
    useOrderCalculations.ts    <- extracted logic

Create hooks/ or stores/ directories inside the domain if they don't exist yet.

Isolated context (component lives outside a domain)

When the component is standalone (e.g., src/components/Dashboard.tsx), convert it into a self-contained directory with an index.tsx that preserves the original import path:

components/
  Dashboard/
    index.tsx                  <- re-exports, preserves import path
    DashboardFilters.tsx       <- extracted presentation component
    hooks/
      useDashboardData.ts      <- extracted logic

Use git mv to move the original file into the new directory as index.tsx, then extract from there.

Step 3: Extract custom hooks

Business logic, state management, data fetching, and complex computations belong in custom hooks. Each hook should have a single, clear responsibility.

Guidelines for extraction:

  • A hook manages one cohesive concern (e.g., form validation, data fetching for a specific resource, pagination state).
  • The hook returns only what the component needs to render -- no internal implementation details leak out.
  • Consolidate into useReducer when either condition applies: (a) 5+ useState variables, or (b) multiple setState calls scattered across different handlers that represent a single state transition -- these become one dispatch call with a descriptive action type instead of several set* calls spread across the codebase.
  • Name the hook after what it does, not where it came from. useOrderFilters over useOrderDetailFilters.

Step 4: Extract presentation components

UI blocks that are large, repeated, or self-contained become their own components. These are pure: they receive props and render JSX, nothing more.

What qualifies for extraction:

  • JSX blocks inside .map() or .forEach() loops -- almost always worth extracting.
  • Conditionally rendered sections with their own visual identity (a modal, a sidebar panel, an empty state).
  • Repeated layout patterns, even if not identical -- parameterize with props.

Presentation components receive data and callbacks as props. They do not call hooks for data fetching or global state. If a presentation component needs local UI state (like a toggle or hover), that's fine -- keep it inside the component.

Step 5: State management decisions

Apply this decision tree for each piece of state:

  1. Used only in one component? Keep it local with useState. Escalate to useReducer when: (a) 5+ state variables, or (b) multiple set* calls in different handlers that logically represent a single state transition and can collapse into one dispatch.
  2. Shared across siblings or cousins? Lift to the nearest common parent and pass as props if the prop chain is shallow (2 levels max).
  3. Shared across distant components or prop drilling becomes painful? Use a zustand store scoped to that feature.

Stores and reducers organization

When creating a zustand store or reducer, place it in a stores/ or reducers/ directory within the domain or component directory. Naming rules:

  • Name after the concern, not the component: cart-items.ts, not shopping-cart-store.ts.
  • Never append "store" or "reducer" to the filename -- the directory already communicates that.
  • Always use kebab-case for filenames.

Step 6: Wire everything together

After extraction:

  1. Update the original component to import and use the new hooks and components.
  2. Verify that the original import path still works (barrel file / index.tsx).
  3. Check that no circular dependencies were introduced.
  4. Run a build (npm run build, npx tsc --noEmit, or the project's equivalent) to confirm there are no type errors or broken imports.

File naming

Name files after their purpose, not after the parent component. Each file type follows its own convention:

  • Components (PascalCase): Pagination.tsx over DataTablePagination.tsx
  • Hooks (camelCase): usePagination.ts over useTablePaginationHook.ts
  • Stores/reducers (kebab-case): cart-items.ts over shopping-cart-store.ts

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

DieGopherLT/dotclaudefiles

plan-feature

1 0
Explore
DieGopherLT/dotclaudefiles

smart-interview

Esta skill debe usarse cuando el usuario pregunta "¿Preguntas?", "¿Tienes dudas?", "¿Tienes preguntas?", "¿Quieres aclarar algo?", "¿Necesitas aclarar algo?", "aclara lo que necesites", o cuando quiere aterrizar requerimientos antes de planear. Tambien la invoca plan-feature en Phase 3. Ejecuta entrevista estructurada para obtener requerimientos cuantificables, reglas de negocio traducibles a codigo, y flujos del sistema; luego anota los resultados en el plan.

1 0
Explore
DieGopherLT/dotclaudefiles

post-implementation

Esta skill debe usarse cuando el usuario pide "haz review de los cambios", "review the changes", "aplica el post-implementacion", "apply post-implementation", "run post-implementation", o cuando el plan aprobado instruye "invoke /smart-plan:post-implementation". Ejecuta workflow post-implementacion despues de que el codigo este completo con quality review (3 reviewers paralelos), auto-fix de issues (confianza >= 80%), documentacion del feature, y commit opcional. Puede usarse despues de cualquier implementacion, no solo smart-plan.

1 0
Explore
DieGopherLT/dotclaudefiles

smart-delegation

Esta skill debe usarse cuando Claude detecta que una implementacion es lo suficientemente grande como para dividirla en sub-agentes (5+ archivos, dependencias entre cambios, nuevas abstracciones que otros archivos consumen), cuando el usuario pide "delega la implementacion", "orquesta los implementadores", "usa sub-agentes", "delegate to sub-agents", "orchestrate implementers", o cuando plan-feature invoca la delegacion tras aprobar un plan.

1 0
Explore
DieGopherLT/dotclaudefiles

tdd-workflow

Esta skill debe usarse cuando el usuario pide "aplicar TDD", "desarrollo guiado por tests", "test-driven development", "red green refactor", "ciclo RGR", "escribir tests primero", "nueva feature con TDD", "mejorar testabilidad", "filosofia TDD", o menciona Iron Laws, TDD philosophy, o quiere entender el proceso TDD. NO usar cuando el usuario pide agregar tests a un proyecto existente o setup de testing — eso es testing:add-testing.

1 0
Explore
DieGopherLT/dotclaudefiles

add-testing

Esta skill debe usarse cuando el usuario pide "agregar tests a proyecto existente", "add testing to existing project", "setup de testing", "configurar infraestructura de tests", "pipeline completo de testing", "quiero tests para este modulo", "agregar cobertura de tests", "add test coverage", "integrar testing al proyecto". Ejecuta pipeline completo de 7 pasos: auditoria de testabilidad, adaptacion condicional de codigo, investigacion de dependencias, implementacion de tests, auditoria de calidad de inputs, reporte de cobertura y generacion de reglas del proyecto.

1 0
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results