Agent skill
spec-kitty-runtime-next
Drive the canonical spec-kitty next --agent <name> control loop for mission advancement. Load agent profiles at init, apply action-scoped doctrine context at each step boundary, and pull specific tactics/directives on demand. Triggers: "run the next step", "what should runtime do next", "advance the mission", "what is the next task", "continue the workflow", "what step comes next". Does NOT handle: setup or repair requests, purely editorial glossary or doctrine maintenance, or direct code review.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty/tree/main/src/doctrine/skills/spec-kitty-runtime-next
SKILL.md
spec-kitty-runtime-next
This skill teaches agents how to advance a Spec Kitty mission through the canonical runtime control loop, including doctrine-aware context loading at each step boundary.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when the user wants to:
- Advance a mission to its next step
- Understand what the runtime will do next
- Unblock a stalled mission
- Interpret runtime outcomes (step, blocked, decision_required, terminal)
How the Runtime-Next System Works
The spec-kitty next command is the single entry point for agent-driven mission
execution. Each call returns a deterministic decision about what action the
agent should take next.
Decision Algorithm
The runtime evaluates state in this order:
- Mission state machine — Current phase and available transitions (from
mission-runtime.yamlDAG) - WP iteration check — For
implementandreviewsteps, the CLI bridge manages WP-level iteration WITHOUT advancing the runtime. The runtime only advances when ALL WPs reach terminal/handoff lanes. - Guard conditions — Required artifacts, prerequisites, dependency graph
- Priority ordering — Reviews before implementations, higher-priority WPs first, dependency-free WPs before dependent ones
WP Iteration Logic (Critical)
The CLI bridge (not the runtime) manages WP-level iteration:
- If current step is
implementorreview - AND there are WPs in
plannedorin_progresslanes - THEN return a WP-level decision without advancing the runtime step
- The runtime step only advances when ALL WPs are in terminal/handoff lanes
(
done,approved, orfor_review)
This means multiple calls to spec-kitty next during implementation will
return different WP IDs but the same step_id (e.g., "implement") until all
WPs are done.
Mission Runtime YAML Schema
Missions define steps as a DAG (directed acyclic graph) with dependencies:
mission:
key: software-dev
name: Software Dev Kitty
version: "2.1.0"
steps:
- id: discovery
title: Discovery & Research
depends_on: []
prompt_template: research.md
- id: specify
depends_on: [discovery]
prompt_template: specify.md
- id: plan
depends_on: [specify]
prompt_template: plan.md
- id: tasks_outline
depends_on: [plan]
prompt_template: tasks.md
- id: tasks_packages
depends_on: [tasks_outline]
- id: tasks_finalize
depends_on: [tasks_packages]
- id: implement
depends_on: [tasks_finalize]
prompt_template: implement.md
- id: review
depends_on: [implement]
prompt_template: review.md
- id: accept
depends_on: [review]
prompt_template: accept.md
The 4 Decision Kinds
Every call to spec-kitty next returns exactly one decision kind:
| Kind | Meaning | Agent Action |
|---|---|---|
step |
Normal action available | Read prompt_file and execute |
decision_required |
Runtime needs input | Answer with --answer and --decision-id |
blocked |
Guards failing, cannot proceed | Read reason + guard_failures, resolve blockers |
terminal |
Mission complete | Run /spec-kitty.accept, exit loop |
Decision Output Fields
{
"kind": "step",
"agent": "claude",
"mission_slug": "042-test-mission",
"mission": "software-dev",
"mission_state": "implementing",
"action": "implement",
"wp_id": "WP02",
"workspace_path": ".worktrees/042-test-mission-lane-b",
"prompt_file": "/tmp/spec-kitty-next-claude-042-test-mission-implement-WP02.md",
"reason": null,
"guard_failures": [],
"progress": {
"total_wps": 5,
"done_wps": 1,
"approved_wps": 0,
"in_progress_wps": 1,
"planned_wps": 3,
"for_review_wps": 0
},
"run_id": "abc123",
"step_id": "implement",
"decision_id": null,
"question": null,
"options": null
}
6 Guard Primitives
Guards block step transitions by returning failure descriptions:
| Guard | Syntax | Checks |
|---|---|---|
artifact_exists |
artifact_exists("spec.md") |
File exists relative to mission dir |
gate_passed |
gate_passed("review_gate") |
Gate event in mission-events.jsonl |
all_wp_status |
all_wp_status("done") |
All WPs in specific lane |
any_wp_status |
any_wp_status("for_review") |
At least one WP in lane |
input_provided |
input_provided("architecture") |
Input exists in runtime model |
event_count |
event_count("review", 1) |
Minimum event count threshold |
Guards never raise exceptions — they return false on missing context.
Prompt File Generation
The runtime generates a temp file at:
/tmp/spec-kitty-next-{agent}-{mission_slug}-{action}[-{wp_id}].md
Template actions (specify, plan, tasks): Mission context header + governance context + action-specific template content.
WP actions (implement, review): Full isolation-aware prompt containing:
- WP header with workspace path
- Governance context (paradigms, directives, tools)
- WP Isolation Rules — DO only modify this WP's status, DO NOT change other WPs or react to their status changes
- Working directory and review commands
- WP file content (from
tasks/WP##.md) - Completion instructions
Decision prompts: Question text, options, and the --answer command to run.
Run Persistence
Runtime state is persisted between calls:
.kittify/runtime/
├── mission-runs.json # Index: {"mission-slug": {"run_id": "...", "run_dir": "..."}}
└── runs/
└── <run_id>/
└── state.json # Runtime snapshot (current step, inputs, etc.)
Mission Detection
When --mission is omitted, the runtime detects the mission via (in order):
SPECIFY_MISSIONenvironment variable- Git branch name (mission and lane branches both encode the feature slug)
- Current directory path (walks up looking for
###-mission-name) - Single mission auto-detect (only if exactly one mission exists)
- Error with guidance if ambiguous
NOTE: Always use --mission <slug> in multi-mission repositories.
Doctrine-Aware Step Execution
The runtime-next loop should load doctrine context iteratively — not all at once. Each step boundary is a context loading opportunity.
Agent Profile at Init
At the start of a session, resolve the active agent profile. This scopes your role, boundaries, and initialization context.
Load the profile using the Python API — do NOT read YAML files directly:
from doctrine.agent_profiles import AgentProfileRepository
from doctrine.service import DoctrineService
repo = AgentProfileRepository()
profile = repo.resolve_profile("<profile-id>") # e.g. "python-implementer"
# Internalize identity — acknowledge this at session start
print(profile.initialization_declaration)
# Respect scope boundaries
profile.specialization.primary_focus # What you actively do
profile.specialization.avoidance_boundary # What you must NOT do
profile.collaboration.handoff_to # Roles to defer to when out of scope
# Load only the directives this profile references
service = DoctrineService(shipped_root, project_root)
for ref in profile.directive_references:
directive = service.directives.get(f"DIRECTIVE_{ref.code}")
Discovery (if you don't know your profile-id):
spec-kitty agent profile list
spec-kitty agent profile show <profile-id>
Action-Scoped Context at Each Step
At each step boundary (when spec-kitty next returns a step decision),
load governance context scoped to the current action — not the full doctrine:
# Load only what's relevant to this action (compact after first load)
spec-kitty charter context --action implement --json
The context system uses two depth levels:
| Depth | When | Content |
|---|---|---|
bootstrap (depth-2) |
First load for this action | Full policy summary + reference list |
compact (depth-1) |
Subsequent loads | Resolved paradigms, directives, tools only |
First-load state is tracked per action in
.kittify/charter/context-state.json. This means implement and
review each get their own first-load bootstrap independently.
Pull Specific Doctrine On Demand
When you need governance guidance mid-step (e.g., how to structure tests, which review criteria apply), pull the specific tactic or directive by ID rather than re-loading the full context:
from doctrine.service import DoctrineService
service = DoctrineService(shipped_root, project_root)
# Pull a specific tactic when it becomes relevant
tactic = service.tactics.get("tdd-red-green-refactor")
# Pull a specific directive
directive = service.directives.get("TEST_FIRST")
The action index (actions/<action>/index.yaml) tells you which doctrine
artifacts are relevant to the current step. Load the index to discover what
to pull:
from doctrine.missions.action_index import load_action_index
index = load_action_index(missions_root, "software-dev", "implement")
# index.directives → ["TEST_FIRST", ...]
# index.tactics → ["tdd-red-green-refactor", ...]
# index.procedures → [...]
Anti-Pattern: Upfront Context Dump
Do NOT load all doctrine into context at session start. This wastes tokens and dilutes relevance. Instead:
- At init: Load agent profile + initialization declaration.
- At each step boundary: Call
charter context --action <action>. - When stuck or need guidance: Pull specific tactic/directive by ID.
- When reviewing: Pull review-scoped doctrine, not implement-scoped.
Step 1: Load Runtime Context
Before invoking the runtime, gather the current state.
Commands:
# Check WP status for a mission
spec-kitty agent tasks status --mission <mission-slug>
# Check current context for an action
spec-kitty agent context resolve --action implement --mission <mission-slug> --json
What to look for:
- Active mission slug and mission type
- Current WP lane status (planned, claimed, in_progress, for_review, approved, done, blocked, canceled)
- Whether there are WPs ready for implementation or review
- Any blocked WPs that need attention first
Step 2: Run the Next Command
# Run the next step
spec-kitty next --agent <agent> --mission <mission-slug> --json
# After completing a step successfully
spec-kitty next --agent <agent> --mission <mission-slug> --result success --json
# After a step failed
spec-kitty next --agent <agent> --mission <mission-slug> --result failed --json
# After a step was blocked
spec-kitty next --agent <agent> --mission <mission-slug> --result blocked --json
Note:
--featureis a hidden deprecated alias for--mission. Always use--missionin new scripts.
The --result flag tells the runtime the outcome of the previous step.
Defaults to success if omitted.
Step 3: Interpret the Result
See references/runtime-result-taxonomy.md for the complete taxonomy.
| Kind | Next Action |
|---|---|
step |
Check prompt_file is not null, then read and execute |
decision_required |
Answer with --answer and --decision-id |
blocked |
Read reason + guard_failures, resolve blockers |
terminal |
Run /spec-kitty.accept for final validation |
Always check guard_failures — this field may appear on any decision kind,
not just blocked.
Always check prompt_file before acting on a step decision. If it is
null, the runtime could not generate a prompt for this step (known issue
#336). Treat a null prompt_file as a blocked state — do not attempt to
execute without a prompt.
Always check progress for completion. If progress.done_wps equals
progress.total_wps but kind is not terminal, the mission is actually
complete (known issue #335). The runtime may not detect completion when no
prior run state exists. Treat this as terminal and run /spec-kitty.accept.
Step 4: Handle decision_required
When the runtime needs input:
# The decision includes question, options, and decision_id
# Answer using:
spec-kitty next --agent <agent> --mission <mission-slug> \
--answer "<choice>" --decision-id "<decision_id>" --json
If the agent cannot determine the answer, escalate to the user with the question and options.
Step 5: Handle Blocked States
See references/blocked-state-recovery.md for detailed recovery patterns.
Quick diagnostic:
# Check WP status and dependency graph
spec-kitty agent tasks status --mission <mission-slug>
# Check specific WP dependencies
spec-kitty agent tasks list-dependents WP## --mission <mission-slug>
Common blockers:
| Blocker | Recovery |
|---|---|
| Missing artifacts (spec.md, plan.md) | Run the planning workflow first |
| Upstream WP not done | Implement or review the upstream WP |
| Review feedback not addressed | Re-implement, address feedback, move to for_review |
| Stale agent (WP in doing, no activity) | Move WP to planned with --force |
| Circular dependencies | Break cycle in WP frontmatter, re-run finalize-tasks |
Step 6: The Agent Loop
The complete agent loop pattern:
# 1. Start the loop
DECISION=$(spec-kitty next --agent claude --mission 042-mission --json)
KIND=$(echo "$DECISION" | jq -r '.kind')
# 2. Loop until terminal or unresolvable block
while [ "$KIND" = "step" ] || [ "$KIND" = "decision_required" ]; do
# Workaround #335: check progress for completion even if kind != terminal
DONE=$(echo "$DECISION" | jq -r '.progress.done_wps // 0')
TOTAL=$(echo "$DECISION" | jq -r '.progress.total_wps // 0')
if [ "$TOTAL" -gt 0 ] && [ "$DONE" -eq "$TOTAL" ]; then
break # Mission is actually complete
fi
if [ "$KIND" = "step" ]; then
PROMPT=$(echo "$DECISION" | jq -r '.prompt_file')
# Workaround #336: treat null prompt as blocked
if [ "$PROMPT" = "null" ] || [ -z "$PROMPT" ]; then
break # Cannot execute without a prompt
fi
# Read and execute the prompt...
RESULT="success" # or "failed" or "blocked"
elif [ "$KIND" = "decision_required" ]; then
# Answer the question...
RESULT="success"
fi
DECISION=$(spec-kitty next --agent claude --mission 042-mission --result "$RESULT" --json)
KIND=$(echo "$DECISION" | jq -r '.kind')
done
# 3. Handle terminal state
if [ "$KIND" = "terminal" ] || [ "$DONE" -eq "$TOTAL" ]; then
# Run /spec-kitty.accept
fi
The loop continues until:
terminal— mission complete, exit loopblocked— cannot proceed without external resolutiondecision_required— only if the agent cannot answer (escalate to user)
Important: Runtime Precedence Rules
- Always use
spec-kitty nextrather than manually sequencing phases - Always pass
--missionin multi-mission repositories - Respect mission state machine transitions — do not skip steps
- Read the
prompt_file— it contains the full context the agent needs - Check
guard_failureson every decision, not just blocked ones - Reviews before implementations — the runtime prioritizes unblocking downstream work
- WP isolation — only modify the WP you were assigned, ignore other WPs
Known Issues
#335 — Completed missions return step instead of terminal. When
spec-kitty next is called on a mission with all WPs done but no prior
runtime run state, it creates a new run starting at discovery instead of
recognizing the mission is complete. Workaround: Check
progress.done_wps == progress.total_wps as a secondary completion signal.
#336 — prompt_file can be null on step decisions. Some steps
(e.g., discovery) lack command templates, so the runtime returns a step
decision with no prompt to execute. Workaround: Check prompt_file
for null before acting; treat null as blocked.
References
references/runtime-result-taxonomy.md-- Decision kinds, output fields, and precedence rulesreferences/blocked-state-recovery.md-- 6 blocked state patterns with diagnosis and recovery
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
spec-kitty-git-workflow
Understand how Spec Kitty manages git: what git operations Python handles automatically, what agents must do manually, worktree lifecycle, auto-commit behavior, merge execution, and the safe-commit pattern. Triggers: "how does spec-kitty use git", "worktree management", "auto-commit", "who commits what", "git workflow", "merge workflow", "rebase WPs", "worktree cleanup", "safe commit". Does NOT handle: runtime loop advancement (use runtime-next), setup or repair (use setup-doctor), mission selection (use mission-system).
spec-kitty-runtime-review
Review runtime-owned outputs using the Spec Kitty review workflow surface, then direct approval or rejection with structured feedback. Triggers: "review this work package", "check runtime output", "approve this step", "review WP", "is this WP ready to approve", "check this implementation". Does NOT handle: setup-only repair requests, direct implementation work, editorial glossary maintenance, or runtime loop advancement.
spec-kitty-glossary-context
Curate and apply canonical terminology across Spec Kitty missions. Triggers: "update the glossary", "use canonical terms", "check terminology", "add a term", "fix term drift", "glossary conflicts", "resolve ambiguity", "review terminology consistency". Does NOT handle: runtime loop advancement, setup or repair requests, agent configuration, or direct code implementation tasks.
spec-kitty-implement-review
Orchestrate the implement-review loop for Spec Kitty work packages using any configured agent. Covers agent dispatch, state transitions, rejection cycles, arbiter escalation, and dependency-aware sequencing across all 13 supported coding agents. Triggers: "implement and review WPs", "run the implement-review loop", "orchestrate WP implementation", "dispatch agents for WPs", "coordinate implement and review", "sprint through WPs". Does NOT handle: specify/plan/tasks phases, setup or repair, glossary maintenance, or direct code editing by the orchestrator.
spec-kitty-charter-doctrine
Run charter interview, generation, context, and sync workflows for project governance in Spec Kitty 3.x. Access doctrine artifacts programmatically via DoctrineService. Resolve agent profiles. Load action-scoped governance context iteratively, not all at once. Triggers: "interview for charter", "generate charter", "sync charter", "use doctrine", "set up governance", "charter status", "extract governance config", "load doctrine", "agent profile", "DoctrineService", "action index". Does NOT handle: generic spec writing not tied to governance, direct runtime loop advancement, setup/repair diagnostics, or editorial glossary maintenance.
spec-kitty-orchestrator-api-operator
Teach agents and external systems how to use spec-kitty orchestrator-api to drive workflows from outside the host CLI. Triggers: "use orchestrator-api", "build a custom orchestrator", "automate externally", "integrate CI with spec-kitty", "call spec-kitty from another tool", "orchestrator contract", "external automation". Does NOT handle: host-internal lane mutation (use the host CLI directly), runtime loop advancement (use spec-kitty next), mission sequencing logic (the mission state machine owns that), or setup/repair diagnostics.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?