Agent skill
software-patterns
Decision framework for architectural patterns including DI, SOA, Repository, Domain Events, Circuit Breaker, and Anti-Corruption Layer. Use when designing systems, choosing patterns, or reviewing architecture.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills/tree/main/universal/architecture/software-patterns
SKILL.md
Software Patterns Primer
Overview
Architectural patterns solve specific structural problems. This skill provides a decision framework for when to apply each pattern, not a catalog to memorize.
Core philosophy: Patterns solve problems. No problem? No pattern needed.
When to Use This Skill
Activate when:
- Designing a new system or major feature
- Adding external service integrations
- Code becomes difficult to test or modify
- Services start calling each other in circles
- Failures in one component cascade to others
- Business logic scatters across multiple locations
Pattern Hierarchy
Foundational (Apply by Default)
These patterns provide the structural foundation for maintainable systems. Apply unless you have specific reasons not to.
| Pattern | Problem Solved | Signal to Apply |
|---|---|---|
| Dependency Injection | Tight coupling, untestable code | Classes instantiate their own dependencies |
| Service-Oriented Architecture | Monolithic tangles, unclear boundaries | Business logic scattered, no clear ownership |
Situational (Apply When Triggered)
These patterns address specific problems. Don't apply preemptively.
| Pattern | Problem Solved | Signal to Apply |
|---|---|---|
| Repository | Data access coupling | Services know about database details |
| Domain Events | Circular dependencies, temporal coupling | Service A calls B calls C calls A |
| Anti-Corruption Layer | External system coupling | External API changes break your code |
| Circuit Breaker | Cascading failures | One slow service takes down everything |
→ Foundational Patterns Detail → Situational Patterns Detail
Quick Decision Tree
Is code hard to test?
├─ Yes → Apply Dependency Injection
└─ No → Continue
Is business logic scattered?
├─ Yes → Apply Service-Oriented Architecture
└─ No → Continue
Do services know database details?
├─ Yes → Apply Repository Pattern
└─ No → Continue
Do services call each other in cycles?
├─ Yes → Apply Domain Events
└─ No → Continue
Does external API change break your code?
├─ Yes → Apply Anti-Corruption Layer
└─ No → Continue
Does one slow service break everything?
├─ Yes → Apply Circuit Breaker
└─ No → Current patterns sufficient
→ Complete Decision Trees
Pattern Selection by Problem
"My code is hard to test"
Primary: Dependency Injection Why: Dependencies passed in = dependencies mockable
"I don't know where business logic lives"
Primary: Service-Oriented Architecture Secondary: Repository (if data access is the confusion) Why: Clear boundaries = clear ownership
"External API changes keep breaking my code"
Primary: Anti-Corruption Layer Why: Translation layer absorbs external volatility
"Services call each other in circles"
Primary: Domain Events Why: Publish/subscribe breaks circular dependencies
"One slow service takes down everything"
Primary: Circuit Breaker Secondary: Retry with Backoff Why: Fail fast prevents cascade
"Database changes ripple through codebase"
Primary: Repository Pattern Why: Abstraction layer isolates data access
→ Real-World Examples
Implementation Priority
When starting a new system:
- First: Establish DI container/pattern
- Second: Define service boundaries (SOA)
- Third: Add Repository for data access
- Then: Layer situational patterns as problems emerge
When refactoring existing system:
- First: Identify the specific pain point
- Second: Apply the minimal pattern that solves it
- Third: Validate improvement before adding more
Key Principles
Minimal Sufficient Pattern Apply the simplest pattern that solves the problem. Over-architecting creates its own maintenance burden.
Problem-First Selection Never ask "which patterns should I use?" Ask "what problem am I solving?"
Composition Over Prescription Patterns combine. Repository + Domain Events + Circuit Breaker is common for external data sources.
Explicit Over Implicit Dependencies should be visible. Service Locator hides them; DI exposes them.
Navigation
Pattern Details
- Foundational Patterns: DI and SOA implementation guides, when to deviate
- Situational Patterns: Repository, Domain Events, ACL, Circuit Breaker details
Decision Support
- Decision Trees: Complete flowcharts for pattern selection
- Anti-Patterns: Common misapplications and how to recognize them
Implementation
- Examples: Language-agnostic pseudocode for each pattern combination
Red Flags - STOP
STOP when:
- "Let me add all these patterns upfront" → Apply only what solves current problems
- "This pattern is best practice" → Best practice for what problem?
- "We might need this later" → YAGNI - add when needed
- "Service Locator is simpler" → Hidden dependencies cause testing pain
- "I'll just call this service directly" → Consider if events would decouple better
- "External API is stable, no need for ACL" → APIs always change eventually
ALL of these mean: STOP. Identify the specific problem first.
Integration with Other Skills
- test-driven-development: DI enables testability; TDD validates pattern application
- systematic-debugging: Clear boundaries (SOA) simplify debugging
- root-cause-tracing: Well-structured services have clearer call chains
Pattern Combinations
Common effective combinations:
| Scenario | Patterns |
|---|---|
| New microservice | DI + SOA + Repository |
| External API integration | DI + ACL + Circuit Breaker |
| Event-driven system | DI + SOA + Domain Events |
| Data-heavy application | DI + SOA + Repository + Unit of Work |
Remember: Patterns exist to solve problems. Start with the problem, not the pattern.
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
bad-example-skill
ANTI-PATTERN - Example showing violations of self-containment (DO NOT COPY)
example-framework-skill
Example of a properly self-contained skill following all best practices
systematic-debugging
Systematic debugging methodology emphasizing root cause analysis over quick fixes
verification-before-completion
Run verification commands and confirm output before claiming success
Root Cause Tracing
Systematically trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger
Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs
Interactive idea refinement using Socratic method to develop fully-formed designs
Didn't find tool you were looking for?