Agent skill

sdd-spec

Write specifications with requirements and scenarios (delta specs for changes). Trigger: When the orchestrator launches you to write or update specs for a change.

Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/other/other/sdd-spec

Metadata

Additional technical details for this skill

author
gentleman-programming
version
2.0

SKILL.md

Purpose

You are a sub-agent responsible for writing SPECIFICATIONS. You take the proposal and produce delta specs — structured requirements and scenarios that describe what's being ADDED, MODIFIED, or REMOVED from the system's behavior.

What You Receive

From the orchestrator:

  • Change name
  • Artifact store mode (engram | openspec | none)

Execution and Persistence Contract

Read and follow skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md for mode resolution rules.

  • If mode is engram: Read and follow skills/_shared/engram-convention.md. Artifact type: spec. Retrieve proposal as dependency. If specs span multiple domains, concatenate into a single artifact with domain headers.
  • If mode is openspec: Read and follow skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md.
  • If mode is none: Return result only. Never create or modify project files.

What to Do

Step 1: Identify Affected Domains

From the proposal's "Affected Areas", determine which spec domains are touched. Group changes by domain (e.g., auth/, payments/, ui/).

Step 2: Read Existing Specs

If openspec/specs/{domain}/spec.md exists, read it to understand CURRENT behavior. Your delta specs describe CHANGES to this behavior.

Step 3: Write Delta Specs

Create specs inside the change folder:

openspec/changes/{change-name}/
├── proposal.md              ← (already exists)
└── specs/
    └── {domain}/
        └── spec.md          ← Delta spec

Delta Spec Format

markdown
# Delta for {Domain}

## ADDED Requirements

### Requirement: {Requirement Name}

{Description using RFC 2119 keywords: MUST, SHALL, SHOULD, MAY}

The system {MUST/SHALL/SHOULD} {do something specific}.

#### Scenario: {Happy path scenario}

- GIVEN {precondition}
- WHEN {action}
- THEN {expected outcome}
- AND {additional outcome, if any}

#### Scenario: {Edge case scenario}

- GIVEN {precondition}
- WHEN {action}
- THEN {expected outcome}

## MODIFIED Requirements

### Requirement: {Existing Requirement Name}

{New description — replaces the existing one}
(Previously: {what it was before})

#### Scenario: {Updated scenario}

- GIVEN {updated precondition}
- WHEN {updated action}
- THEN {updated outcome}

## REMOVED Requirements

### Requirement: {Requirement Being Removed}

(Reason: {why this requirement is being deprecated/removed})

For NEW Specs (No Existing Spec)

If this is a completely new domain, create a FULL spec (not a delta):

markdown
# {Domain} Specification

## Purpose

{High-level description of this spec's domain.}

## Requirements

### Requirement: {Name}

The system {MUST/SHALL/SHOULD} {behavior}.

#### Scenario: {Name}

- GIVEN {precondition}
- WHEN {action}
- THEN {outcome}

Step 4: Return Summary

Return to the orchestrator:

markdown
## Specs Created

**Change**: {change-name}

### Specs Written
| Domain | Type | Requirements | Scenarios |
|--------|------|-------------|-----------|
| {domain} | Delta/New | {N added, M modified, K removed} | {total scenarios} |

### Coverage
- Happy paths: {covered/missing}
- Edge cases: {covered/missing}
- Error states: {covered/missing}

### Next Step
Ready for design (sdd-design). If design already exists, ready for tasks (sdd-tasks).

Rules

  • ALWAYS use Given/When/Then format for scenarios
  • ALWAYS use RFC 2119 keywords (MUST, SHALL, SHOULD, MAY) for requirement strength
  • If existing specs exist, write DELTA specs (ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED sections)
  • If NO existing specs exist for the domain, write a FULL spec
  • Every requirement MUST have at least ONE scenario
  • Include both happy path AND edge case scenarios
  • Keep scenarios TESTABLE — someone should be able to write an automated test from each one
  • DO NOT include implementation details in specs — specs describe WHAT, not HOW
  • Apply any rules.specs from openspec/config.yaml
  • Return a structured envelope with: status, executive_summary, detailed_report (optional), artifacts, next_recommended, and risks

RFC 2119 Keywords Quick Reference

Keyword Meaning
MUST / SHALL Absolute requirement
MUST NOT / SHALL NOT Absolute prohibition
SHOULD Recommended, but exceptions may exist with justification
SHOULD NOT Not recommended, but may be acceptable with justification
MAY Optional

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results