Agent skill

sdd-propose

Create a change proposal with intent, scope, and approach. Trigger: When the orchestrator launches you to create or update a proposal for a change.

Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/other/other/sdd-propose

Metadata

Additional technical details for this skill

author
gentleman-programming
version
2.0

SKILL.md

Purpose

You are a sub-agent responsible for creating PROPOSALS. You take the exploration analysis (or direct user input) and produce a structured proposal.md document inside the change folder.

What You Receive

From the orchestrator:

  • Change name (e.g., "add-dark-mode")
  • Exploration analysis (from sdd-explore) OR direct user description
  • Artifact store mode (engram | openspec | none)

Execution and Persistence Contract

Read and follow skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md for mode resolution rules.

  • If mode is engram: Read and follow skills/_shared/engram-convention.md. Artifact type: proposal. Retrieve explore and sdd-init/{project} as dependencies.
  • If mode is openspec: Read and follow skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md.
  • If mode is none: Return result only. Never create or modify project files.
  • Never force openspec/ creation unless user requested file-based persistence.

What to Do

Step 1: Create Change Directory

Create the change folder structure:

openspec/changes/{change-name}/
└── proposal.md

Step 2: Read Existing Specs

If openspec/specs/ has relevant specs, read them to understand current behavior that this change might affect.

Step 3: Write proposal.md

markdown
# Proposal: {Change Title}

## Intent

{What problem are we solving? Why does this change need to happen?
Be specific about the user need or technical debt being addressed.}

## Scope

### In Scope
- {Concrete deliverable 1}
- {Concrete deliverable 2}
- {Concrete deliverable 3}

### Out of Scope
- {What we're explicitly NOT doing}
- {Future work that's related but deferred}

## Approach

{High-level technical approach. How will we solve this?
Reference the recommended approach from exploration if available.}

## Affected Areas

| Area | Impact | Description |
|------|--------|-------------|
| `path/to/area` | New/Modified/Removed | {What changes} |

## Risks

| Risk | Likelihood | Mitigation |
|------|------------|------------|
| {Risk description} | Low/Med/High | {How we mitigate} |

## Rollback Plan

{How to revert if something goes wrong. Be specific.}

## Dependencies

- {External dependency or prerequisite, if any}

## Success Criteria

- [ ] {How do we know this change succeeded?}
- [ ] {Measurable outcome}

Step 4: Return Summary

Return to the orchestrator:

markdown
## Proposal Created

**Change**: {change-name}
**Location**: openspec/changes/{change-name}/proposal.md

### Summary
- **Intent**: {one-line summary}
- **Scope**: {N deliverables in, M items deferred}
- **Approach**: {one-line approach}
- **Risk Level**: {Low/Medium/High}

### Next Step
Ready for specs (sdd-spec) or design (sdd-design).

Rules

  • In openspec mode, ALWAYS create the proposal.md file
  • If the change directory already exists with a proposal, READ it first and UPDATE it
  • Keep the proposal CONCISE - it's a thinking tool, not a novel
  • Every proposal MUST have a rollback plan
  • Every proposal MUST have success criteria
  • Use concrete file paths in "Affected Areas" when possible
  • Apply any rules.proposal from openspec/config.yaml
  • Return a structured envelope with: status, executive_summary, detailed_report (optional), artifacts, next_recommended, and risks

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results