Agent skill
review-this-branch
{{ 𝛀𝛀𝛀 }} Assess branch readiness for PR submission
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/other/other/review-this-branch
SKILL.md
Assess whether this branch is ready to be submitted as a reviewable pull request.
Analysis Steps
- Identify the base branch (usually
main) and list all commits since diverging - Review the full diff for:
- Incomplete work (half-implemented features, placeholder logic)
- Obvious bugs or unhandled edge cases
- Code quality issues that would block a reviewer
- Check commit history:
- Conventional commit compliance (
type(scope): description) - Logical atomicity — each commit should represent one coherent change
- No WIP, fixup, or junk commits that should have been cleaned up
- Conventional commit compliance (
- Check branch name against naming conventions:
- Format:
<prefix>/<short-description>(lowercase, hyphens, imperative) - Valid prefixes:
feat,fix,enhance,refactor,types,perf,styles,layout,docs,test,deps,config,build,agents,chore,ci,deploy,spike,experiment,wip,hotfix - Breaking change branches should use
<prefix>/breaking-<description>
- Format:
- Scan for anti-patterns:
- Debugging artefacts (
console.log, commented-out code) - Unresolved conflict markers (
<<<<<<<,=======,>>>>>>>) TODO/FIXMEcomments introduced in this branch- Diff size >500 lines (flag for possible split)
- Debugging artefacts (
- Detect breaking changes:
- Removed or renamed exports, functions, types, or components
- Changed function signatures (required parameters added/reordered)
- Modified return types in a widening direction
- Database schema changes (columns removed/renamed, constraints changed)
- HTTP API changes (routes, methods, request/response shapes)
- New required environment variables
- Changed component props (removed, renamed, type-changed, newly required)
Output Format
Verdict
One of: Ready | Needs Work | Blocked
Branch Health
- Branch name compliance
- Commit message quality
- Commit atomicity
Code Quality Flags
Specific issues found, with file and line references where possible. Omit this section if none found.
Breaking Changes
Any detected breaking changes with context. Flag format:
⚠️ Breaking change — consider
feat!:orBREAKING CHANGE:footer
Omit this section if none found.
Recommended Next Steps
Ordered list — blockers first, then improvements, then nice-to-haves.
If the verdict is Ready, offer to run /git:pull-request immediately.
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
agent-ops-spec
Manage specification documents in .agent/specs/. Use when user provides requirements, acceptance criteria, or feature descriptions that need to be tracked and validated against implementation.
agent-ops-state
Maintain .agent state files. Use at session start, after meaningful steps, and before concluding: read/update constitution/memory/focus/issues/baseline consistently.
agent-ops-spec
Manage specification documents in .agent/specs/. Use when user provides requirements, acceptance criteria, or feature descriptions that need to be tracked and validated against implementation.
agent-ops-testing
Test strategy, execution, and coverage analysis. Use when designing tests, running test suites, or analyzing test results beyond baseline checks.
agent-ops-testing
Test strategy, execution, and coverage analysis. Use when designing tests, running test suites, or analyzing test results beyond baseline checks.
agent-ops-state
Maintain .agent state files. Use at session start, after meaningful steps, and before concluding: read/update constitution/memory/focus/issues/baseline consistently.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?