review-professionalism

Enter planning mode. Deep-review all user-facing aspects of the app for professionalism and polish. Use maximum parallelism — spawn explore agents for independent areas.

Context

Making an AHK app feel native and professional on Windows is hard. Past reviews have surfaced valuable improvements — consistent theming, proper DPI handling, polished message boxes, etc. This review checks whether the app still feels professional as features have been added.

What to Look For

Visual polish

• Inconsistent fonts, sizes, or spacing across different windows/dialogs
• Controls that don't align properly or have uneven margins
• Windows that don't respect system DPI scaling
• Dark/light mode inconsistencies (see theme.ahk — the theme system exists, but is it applied everywhere?)
• Flash or flicker when showing/hiding windows (see gui_antiflash.ahk)
• Tray icon and menu looking native and consistent with Windows conventions

User-facing text

• Typos, grammatical errors, or awkward phrasing in any user-visible string
• Inconsistent capitalization (Title Case vs Sentence case across dialogs)
• Technical jargon exposed to end users who won't understand it
• Error messages that don't tell the user what to do next
• Tooltip text that's too vague or too verbose

UX quality of life

• Operations that block the UI without feedback (no progress indication)
• Dialogs that appear in unexpected positions (not centered on parent/monitor)
• Missing keyboard navigation (Tab order, Enter to confirm, Escape to cancel)
• Actions that can't be undone but have no confirmation prompt
• Config changes that require restart but don't tell the user

Native Windows behavior

• Message boxes that don't use ThemeMsgBox() (the project's themed replacement)
• Windows that don't appear in taskbar when they should (or appear when they shouldn't)
• Improper window ownership (child dialogs that can go behind parent)
• Missing or wrong window icons
• Context menus that don't follow Windows conventions

Installer/update experience

• Wizard steps that are confusing or have unclear choices
• Update notifications that are intrusive or poorly timed
• Elevation prompts without explanation of why admin is needed
• Error recovery that leaves the user stranded

Config editor

• Settings descriptions that are unclear to non-technical users
• Missing validation feedback (user enters invalid value, nothing happens)
• Settings that interact but don't communicate this to the user

Explore Strategy

Split by user-facing surface:

• Overlay / Alt-Tab UI — src/gui/gui_paint.ahk, gui_overlay.ahk — the main interaction surface
• Tray menu / launcher — src/alt_tabby.ahk, launcher files — first impression and daily interaction point
• Config editor — src/editors/ — where users spend time customizing
• Wizard / installation — wizard files, setup utilities — first-run experience
• Dialogs / message boxes — grep for MsgBox, ThemeMsgBox, Gui() across all files
• User-facing strings — all strings shown to users (error messages, tooltips, menu items, descriptions)

Validation

After explore agents report back, validate every finding yourself. "Professionalism" is subjective — what one person calls polish, another calls unnecessary complexity.

For each candidate:

1. Cite evidence: "I verified by reading file.ahk lines X–Y" with the actual user-facing text or UI code quoted.
2. User impact: Who sees this and when? A rough edge in the first-run wizard matters more than one in a diagnostic dialog.
3. Counter-argument: "What would make this fix unnecessary or counterproductive?" — Is the current behavior actually fine and the "improvement" just taste? Would the fix add complexity for minimal visual gain?
4. Observed vs inferred: Did you see the issue in the code, or infer it from the absence of something (e.g., "no DPI handling" — but did you check if AHK handles it automatically)?

Plan Format

Group by user-facing area:

Order by user exposure: high-traffic surfaces first (overlay, tray, config editor), rarely-seen surfaces last (wizard, error dialogs).

Ignore any existing plans — create a fresh one.