PR Review

Review the specified pull request thoroughly.

Arguments

• $ARGUMENTS - PR number (e.g., 123) or full URL (e.g., https://github.com/org/repo/pull/123)

Process

1. Fetch PR metadata - Get title, description, author, base/head branches
2. Get the diff - Review all changed files
3. Read full context - For complex changes, read the complete files to understand surrounding code
4. Check against project standards - Reference CLAUDE.md and existing patterns

Review Criteria

• Correctness - Does the code do what it claims?
• Security - Any vulnerabilities (injection, XSS, auth issues)?
• Tests - Are changes adequately tested?
• Style - Follows project conventions?
• Complexity - Is it overengineered or too clever?

Output Format

Provide a structured review:

## Summary
One-line assessment (approve/request changes/needs discussion)

## Changes Overview
Brief description of what the PR does

## Feedback
### Issues (must fix)
- ...

### Suggestions (nice to have)
- ...

### Questions
- ...

## Files Reviewed
- path/to/file.py - brief note