Agent skill

review-orchestrator

Dispatch review subagents, compile feedback, triage for human decision. Use after quality gates pass.

Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/data/review-orchestrator

SKILL.md

Review Orchestrator

Dispatches multiple review subagents in parallel, compiles and deduplicates their feedback, and presents a triaged list for human decision.

When to Use

  • Quality gates have passed (lint, typecheck, tests)
  • Code changes are ready for review
  • Before creating a PR

Prerequisites

  • CodeRabbit CLI installed: which coderabbit
  • Authenticated: coderabbit auth login
  • Pro tier allows 8 reviews/hour

Workflow

1. Verify Readiness

bash
# Check CodeRabbit installed
which coderabbit

# Check there are changes to review
git status --porcelain
git diff --stat HEAD~1  # or vs base branch

If no changes or CodeRabbit missing, stop and inform user.

2. Gather Context

Collect before dispatching subagents:

  • List of changed files: git diff --name-only HEAD~1
  • The run directory path (for saving review-comments.md)
  • Ticket requirements from ticket.json if available
  • Plan file if available

3. Dispatch Review Subagents

Use the Task tool to dispatch three parallel review subagents:

Subagent 1: CodeRabbit Review

Run CodeRabbit CLI review on the current changes.

Commands:
cd {REPO_PATH}
coderabbit --prompt-only --type uncommitted

Parse output and categorize findings by severity:
- Critical: Security, race conditions, data loss
- Major: Logic errors, performance, missing error handling
- Minor: Code style, naming
- Nitpick: Formatting preferences

Return structured list with file:line, issue, suggested fix.

Subagent 2: Agent Code Review

Perform comprehensive code review of the changes.

Files to review: {FILES_LIST}
Ticket requirements: {TICKET_REQUIREMENTS}

Review Checklist:
1. Functionality: Implements requirements, handles edge cases, proper error handling
2. Code Quality: TypeScript (no any), Vue (Composition API), Tailwind (no dark:), naming conventions
3. Architecture: Follows existing patterns, no over-engineering, clean separation
4. Testing: Tests added, behavioral not change detectors, edge cases covered
5. Security: No secrets exposed, input validation, no XSS/injection
6. Performance: No unnecessary re-renders, efficient data structures

Return findings with severity (Critical/Major/Minor), location (file:line), and fix suggestion.

Subagent 3: Pattern Compliance Review

Check code against target repository patterns and AGENTS.md guidelines.

Files to review: {FILES_LIST}

Check for violations:
- Vue: Reactive props destructuring (not withDefaults), separate type imports
- Tailwind: No dark: variants (use semantic themes), use cn() utility, no !important
- TypeScript: No any types, no as any assertions
- State: No unnecessary computed/watch when simpler works
- Testing: Behavioral tests, not change detectors or mock tests

Return violations with file:line and the correct pattern to use.

4. Compile and Deduplicate

After all subagents complete:

  1. Merge findings from all three reviewers
  2. Remove duplicates: Same issue found by multiple reviewers (note "Found by: CodeRabbit, Agent")
  3. Resolve conflicts: If reviewers disagree, note both perspectives with recommendation
  4. Group by file: Organize findings by file path
  5. Sort by severity: Critical → Major → Minor → Nitpick

5. Generate Review Summary

Create structured output:

markdown
# Code Review Summary

## Statistics

- Total findings: {count}
- Critical: {count}
- Major: {count}
- Minor: {count}
- Nitpicks: {count}
- Duplicates removed: {count}

## Critical Issues (Must Fix)

### [C1] {Title}

- **File:** `path/to/file.ts:42`
- **Source:** CodeRabbit / Agent / Pattern
- **Issue:** {description}
- **Fix:**

```typescript
// Suggested fix
```

Major Issues (Should Fix)

[M1] {Title}

  • File: path/to/file.ts:55
  • Source: {source}
  • Issue: {description}
  • Fix: {suggestion}

Minor Issues (Consider)

[m1] {Title}

  • File: path/to/file.ts:10
  • Issue: {description}
  • Fix: {suggestion}

Nitpicks (Optional)

  • [N1] file.ts:10 - {description}
  • [N2] file.ts:20 - {description}

Conflicting Opinions

{Topic}

  • CodeRabbit says: {opinion}
  • Agent says: {opinion}
  • Recommendation: {which to follow and why}

### 6. Present Triage Interface

Review complete. {X} findings across {Y} files.

For each finding, respond with:

  • Numbers to implement (e.g., "C1, M1, M3")
  • "all critical" - implement all critical
  • "all major" - implement all critical + major
  • "all" - implement everything
  • "skip N1, N2" - skip specific items
  • "clarify M2" - need more info on item

Your response:


Wait for human decision.

### 7. Save Review

Save full review to `{run-dir}/review-comments.md`:
- Complete review summary
- All findings with full details
- Human's triage decisions
- Timestamp

Update `status.json`:
```json
{
  "stage": "review-complete",
  "reviewStats": {
    "critical": 0,
    "major": 2,
    "minor": 3,
    "nitpicks": 5
  },
  "selectedFixes": ["C1", "M1", "M2"],
  "skippedItems": ["N1", "N2"]
}

8. Handle Implementation

For selected items:

  • Dispatch fix subagents for each selected item, OR
  • Return to implementation phase with specific fix list

After fixes, re-run affected quality gates to verify.

Severity Definitions

Severity Description Action
Critical Security issues, race conditions, data loss, breaking bugs Must fix before PR
Major Logic errors, performance issues, missing error handling Should fix
Minor Code style, naming, documentation Consider fixing
Nitpick Formatting, personal preference Optional

Rate Limiting

CodeRabbit Pro: 8 reviews/hour. Track usage and warn if approaching limit.

Fallback

If CodeRabbit is unavailable:

  1. Skip CodeRabbit subagent
  2. Note in review summary: "CodeRabbit review skipped: {reason}"
  3. Continue with Agent and Pattern reviews

Example Session

> Review the changes

Checking prerequisites...
✓ CodeRabbit installed
✓ 5 files changed

Dispatching review subagents...
  [1/3] CodeRabbit: Running...
  [2/3] Agent Review: Running...
  [3/3] Pattern Review: Running...

All reviews complete. Compiling findings...

# Code Review Summary

## Statistics
- Total findings: 8
- Critical: 0
- Major: 2
- Minor: 3
- Nitpicks: 3
- Duplicates removed: 2

## Major Issues (Should Fix)

### [M1] Missing error handling in API call
- **File:** `src/api/client.ts:42`
- **Source:** CodeRabbit, Agent
- **Issue:** API call doesn't handle network errors
- **Fix:** Wrap in try/catch, show user-friendly error

### [M2] Unnecessary re-render in computed
- **File:** `src/components/Panel.vue:15`
- **Source:** Agent
- **Issue:** Computed recalculates on every render
- **Fix:** Memoize or move to watchEffect

...

Review complete. 8 findings across 5 files.

For each finding, respond with:
- Numbers to implement (e.g., "M1, M2")
- "all major" - implement all critical + major
- "skip N1" - skip specific items

Your response:

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results