Agent skill
review-orchestrator
Dispatch review subagents, compile feedback, triage for human decision. Use after quality gates pass.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/data/review-orchestrator
SKILL.md
Review Orchestrator
Dispatches multiple review subagents in parallel, compiles and deduplicates their feedback, and presents a triaged list for human decision.
When to Use
- Quality gates have passed (lint, typecheck, tests)
- Code changes are ready for review
- Before creating a PR
Prerequisites
- CodeRabbit CLI installed:
which coderabbit - Authenticated:
coderabbit auth login - Pro tier allows 8 reviews/hour
Workflow
1. Verify Readiness
# Check CodeRabbit installed
which coderabbit
# Check there are changes to review
git status --porcelain
git diff --stat HEAD~1 # or vs base branch
If no changes or CodeRabbit missing, stop and inform user.
2. Gather Context
Collect before dispatching subagents:
- List of changed files:
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 - The run directory path (for saving review-comments.md)
- Ticket requirements from
ticket.jsonif available - Plan file if available
3. Dispatch Review Subagents
Use the Task tool to dispatch three parallel review subagents:
Subagent 1: CodeRabbit Review
Run CodeRabbit CLI review on the current changes.
Commands:
cd {REPO_PATH}
coderabbit --prompt-only --type uncommitted
Parse output and categorize findings by severity:
- Critical: Security, race conditions, data loss
- Major: Logic errors, performance, missing error handling
- Minor: Code style, naming
- Nitpick: Formatting preferences
Return structured list with file:line, issue, suggested fix.
Subagent 2: Agent Code Review
Perform comprehensive code review of the changes.
Files to review: {FILES_LIST}
Ticket requirements: {TICKET_REQUIREMENTS}
Review Checklist:
1. Functionality: Implements requirements, handles edge cases, proper error handling
2. Code Quality: TypeScript (no any), Vue (Composition API), Tailwind (no dark:), naming conventions
3. Architecture: Follows existing patterns, no over-engineering, clean separation
4. Testing: Tests added, behavioral not change detectors, edge cases covered
5. Security: No secrets exposed, input validation, no XSS/injection
6. Performance: No unnecessary re-renders, efficient data structures
Return findings with severity (Critical/Major/Minor), location (file:line), and fix suggestion.
Subagent 3: Pattern Compliance Review
Check code against target repository patterns and AGENTS.md guidelines.
Files to review: {FILES_LIST}
Check for violations:
- Vue: Reactive props destructuring (not withDefaults), separate type imports
- Tailwind: No dark: variants (use semantic themes), use cn() utility, no !important
- TypeScript: No any types, no as any assertions
- State: No unnecessary computed/watch when simpler works
- Testing: Behavioral tests, not change detectors or mock tests
Return violations with file:line and the correct pattern to use.
4. Compile and Deduplicate
After all subagents complete:
- Merge findings from all three reviewers
- Remove duplicates: Same issue found by multiple reviewers (note "Found by: CodeRabbit, Agent")
- Resolve conflicts: If reviewers disagree, note both perspectives with recommendation
- Group by file: Organize findings by file path
- Sort by severity: Critical → Major → Minor → Nitpick
5. Generate Review Summary
Create structured output:
# Code Review Summary
## Statistics
- Total findings: {count}
- Critical: {count}
- Major: {count}
- Minor: {count}
- Nitpicks: {count}
- Duplicates removed: {count}
## Critical Issues (Must Fix)
### [C1] {Title}
- **File:** `path/to/file.ts:42`
- **Source:** CodeRabbit / Agent / Pattern
- **Issue:** {description}
- **Fix:**
```typescript
// Suggested fix
```
Major Issues (Should Fix)
[M1] {Title}
- File:
path/to/file.ts:55 - Source: {source}
- Issue: {description}
- Fix: {suggestion}
Minor Issues (Consider)
[m1] {Title}
- File:
path/to/file.ts:10 - Issue: {description}
- Fix: {suggestion}
Nitpicks (Optional)
- [N1]
file.ts:10- {description} - [N2]
file.ts:20- {description}
Conflicting Opinions
{Topic}
- CodeRabbit says: {opinion}
- Agent says: {opinion}
- Recommendation: {which to follow and why}
### 6. Present Triage Interface
Review complete. {X} findings across {Y} files.
For each finding, respond with:
- Numbers to implement (e.g., "C1, M1, M3")
- "all critical" - implement all critical
- "all major" - implement all critical + major
- "all" - implement everything
- "skip N1, N2" - skip specific items
- "clarify M2" - need more info on item
Your response:
Wait for human decision.
### 7. Save Review
Save full review to `{run-dir}/review-comments.md`:
- Complete review summary
- All findings with full details
- Human's triage decisions
- Timestamp
Update `status.json`:
```json
{
"stage": "review-complete",
"reviewStats": {
"critical": 0,
"major": 2,
"minor": 3,
"nitpicks": 5
},
"selectedFixes": ["C1", "M1", "M2"],
"skippedItems": ["N1", "N2"]
}
8. Handle Implementation
For selected items:
- Dispatch fix subagents for each selected item, OR
- Return to implementation phase with specific fix list
After fixes, re-run affected quality gates to verify.
Severity Definitions
| Severity | Description | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Critical | Security issues, race conditions, data loss, breaking bugs | Must fix before PR |
| Major | Logic errors, performance issues, missing error handling | Should fix |
| Minor | Code style, naming, documentation | Consider fixing |
| Nitpick | Formatting, personal preference | Optional |
Rate Limiting
CodeRabbit Pro: 8 reviews/hour. Track usage and warn if approaching limit.
Fallback
If CodeRabbit is unavailable:
- Skip CodeRabbit subagent
- Note in review summary: "CodeRabbit review skipped: {reason}"
- Continue with Agent and Pattern reviews
Example Session
> Review the changes
Checking prerequisites...
✓ CodeRabbit installed
✓ 5 files changed
Dispatching review subagents...
[1/3] CodeRabbit: Running...
[2/3] Agent Review: Running...
[3/3] Pattern Review: Running...
All reviews complete. Compiling findings...
# Code Review Summary
## Statistics
- Total findings: 8
- Critical: 0
- Major: 2
- Minor: 3
- Nitpicks: 3
- Duplicates removed: 2
## Major Issues (Should Fix)
### [M1] Missing error handling in API call
- **File:** `src/api/client.ts:42`
- **Source:** CodeRabbit, Agent
- **Issue:** API call doesn't handle network errors
- **Fix:** Wrap in try/catch, show user-friendly error
### [M2] Unnecessary re-render in computed
- **File:** `src/components/Panel.vue:15`
- **Source:** Agent
- **Issue:** Computed recalculates on every render
- **Fix:** Memoize or move to watchEffect
...
Review complete. 8 findings across 5 files.
For each finding, respond with:
- Numbers to implement (e.g., "M1, M2")
- "all major" - implement all critical + major
- "skip N1" - skip specific items
Your response:
Didn't find tool you were looking for?