Propose Lane Move

Analyze a Business OS card's current state and propose a lane transition based on evidence from stage documents and completion criteria. The agent proposes; Pete approves and executes the move.

Operating Mode

READ-ONLY ANALYSIS + PROPOSAL

Allowed:

• Read card data via agent API
• Read all stage documents via agent API
• Analyze evidence against lane transition criteria
• Update card's Proposed-Lane field via API PATCH

Not allowed:

• Moving card to new lane (Pete does this via UI after approval)
• Creating stage documents (use /work-idea for that)
• Modifying lane transition rules

Inputs

Required:

• Card ID (e.g., BRIK-ENG-0001)

Optional:

• Target lane (if Pete has a specific lane in mind; otherwise agent recommends)

Lane Transition Criteria

From Inbox → Fact-finding

• Evidence required: None (always allowed)
• Action: Agent creates fact-find stage doc via /work-idea (API-backed)

From Fact-finding → Planned

• Evidence required:
  • Fact-finding stage doc exists and contains findings
  • Key questions answered or marked as assumptions
  • Blast radius understood
  • Evidence sources documented (measurement, customer-input, repo-diff, experiment, etc.)
• Recommendation: Create plan (separate task) before proposing move

From Planned → In progress

• Evidence required:
  • Plan stage doc exists with clear acceptance criteria
  • Dependencies resolved (no blocking cards)
  • Owner assigned
  • Confidence ≥80% (if measurable)

From In progress → Done

• Evidence required:
  • All acceptance criteria met
  • Tests passing
  • Code changes committed
  • No open blockers

From In progress → Blocked

• Evidence required:
  • Blocker documented in stage doc or comments
  • Blocker card created and linked (if applicable)

From Done → Reflected

• Evidence required:
  • Reflection stage doc created with outcomes, learnings, metrics
  • Any follow-up cards created
  • Business plan updated (if applicable)

From any lane → Inbox (reset)

• Evidence required: Fundamental change in approach or requirements
• Recommendation: Document reason in comments

Archiving (Dropped/Retired)

• Not handled by this skill - use archive mechanism separately

Workflow

1. Read card + stage docs via agent API

   jsonCopy

   {
     "method": "GET",
     "url": "${BOS_AGENT_API_BASE_URL}/api/agent/cards/BRIK-ENG-0001",
     "headers": { "X-Agent-API-Key": "${BOS_AGENT_API_KEY}" }
   }
   

   jsonCopy

   {
     "method": "GET",
     "url": "${BOS_AGENT_API_BASE_URL}/api/agent/stage-docs?cardId=BRIK-ENG-0001",
     "headers": { "X-Agent-API-Key": "${BOS_AGENT_API_KEY}" }
   }
   

2. Analyze current lane and evidence

   • Check what stage docs exist
   • Verify evidence completeness against criteria above
   • Check for blockers (Dependencies field, comments)

3. Determine eligible target lanes

   • Based on current lane and available evidence
   • Consider forward progression (Inbox → ... → Reflected)
   • Consider lateral moves (In progress → Blocked, back to Planned)

4. Propose lane

   • Update card's Proposed-Lane field via API PATCH
   • Add comment explaining rationale and evidence references
   • Example:
     markdownCopy

     ## Lane Move Proposal: Fact-finding → Planned
     
     **Evidence:**
     - Fact-finding stage doc complete (API stage `fact-find`)
     - Key questions answered in FAQ section
     - Blast radius: Medium (affects 3 files in `apps/brikette/src/components/`)
     - Evidence sources: repo-diff (commit abc123), measurement (page load reduced 200ms)
     
     **Recommendation:** Create plan doc before moving to Planned lane.
     

5. Persist proposal via API

   jsonCopy

   {
     "method": "PATCH",
     "url": "${BOS_AGENT_API_BASE_URL}/api/agent/cards/BRIK-ENG-0001",
     "headers": {
       "X-Agent-API-Key": "${BOS_AGENT_API_KEY}",
       "Content-Type": "application/json"
     },
     "body": {
       "baseEntitySha": "<entitySha from GET>",
       "patch": { "Proposed-Lane": "Planned" }
     }
   }
   

   Conflict handling: if PATCH returns 409, refetch and retry once. If it conflicts again, stop and surface the error.

Evidence Quality Checks

Before proposing a move, verify:

• Evidence sources are typed (use evidence type enum from BOS-26)
• Evidence is specific (links to files, commits, metrics, not vague statements)
• Evidence is recent (prefer data from last 30 days for active cards)
• Assumptions are explicit (mark any unknowns clearly)

Edge Cases

Card has multiple blockers

• Propose In progress → Blocked
• List all blockers in proposal comment
• Recommend creating blocker cards if they don't exist

Evidence is weak/missing

• Do NOT propose move
• Recommend specific evidence gathering steps
• Example: "Run performance benchmarks before proposing Done"

Proposed-Lane already set

• Check if proposal is still valid
• If new evidence warrants different lane, update proposal
• If proposal is stale (>7 days), recommend refreshing

Dependencies unresolved

• Do NOT propose Planned → In progress
• List unresolved dependency card IDs
• Check dependency card status and estimate timeline

Integration with Other Skills

• Use /work-idea to create Fact-finding stage doc before proposing Inbox → Fact-finding
• Use /scan-repo to gather repo evidence for proposals
• Follow up proposal with /update-business-plan if lane move affects strategy

Example Session

User: /propose-lane-move BRIK-ENG-0001

Agent:
I'll analyze BRIK-ENG-0001 and propose a lane move.

[Reads card: currently in Fact-finding lane]
[Reads stage docs: fact-find stage exists]
[Checks evidence: contains repo-diff evidence, measurement data, clear findings]

Based on the analysis:

**Current lane:** Fact-finding
**Proposed lane:** Planned
**Evidence:**
- Fact-finding stage doc complete with 3 key findings
- Evidence: repo-diff (8 files analyzed), measurement (200ms improvement confirmed)
- No blocking dependencies identified
- Blast radius: Medium (3 components in apps/brikette)

**Next steps:**
1. Create plan stage doc with acceptance criteria
2. Pete reviews and approves via card edit UI
3. Move to Planned lane

I'll now update the card's Proposed-Lane field.

[Commits change with agent identity]

Done! Proposal added to BRIK-ENG-0001. Pete can review in the card detail view.

Error Handling

• Card not found: Return clear error with card ID
• No stage docs: Recommend starting with Fact-finding
• Insufficient evidence: List specific missing evidence, don't propose move
• Invalid target lane: Explain lane progression rules

Phase 0 Constraints

• Pete-only approval (no automated approvals)
• Agent identity used for all proposal commits
• UI shows Proposed-Lane but Pete must manually update Lane field
• Fail-closed: if API is unavailable or conflicts after retry, stop and surface the error
• No notification system (Pete checks boards manually)

Success Metrics

• Proposals approved without modification: >80%
• Evidence completeness: All proposals reference specific stage doc sections
• Proposal turnaround: <2 days from proposal to approval (Pete's discretion)