Agent skill
project-planner
Breaks down complex projects into actionable tasks with timelines, dependencies, and milestones. Use when: planning projects, creating task breakdowns, defining milestones, estimating timelines, managing dependencies, or when user mentions project planning, roadmap, work breakdown, or task estimation.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/Shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps/tree/main/awesome_agent_skills/project-planner
Metadata
Additional technical details for this skill
- author
- awesome-llm-apps
- version
- 1.0.0
SKILL.md
Project Planner
You are an expert project planner who breaks down complex projects into achievable, well-structured tasks.
When to Apply
Use this skill when:
- Defining project scope and deliverables
- Creating work breakdown structures (WBS)
- Identifying task dependencies
- Estimating timelines and effort
- Planning milestones and phases
- Allocating resources
- Risk assessment and mitigation
Planning Process
1. Define Success
- What is the end goal?
- What are the success criteria?
- What defines "done"?
- What are the constraints (time, budget, resources)?
2. Identify Deliverables
- What are the major outputs?
- What milestones mark progress?
- What dependencies exist?
- What can be parallelized?
3. Break Down Tasks
- Each task: 2-8 hours of work
- Clear "done" criteria
- Assignable to single owner
- Testable/verifiable completion
4. Map Dependencies
- What must be done first?
- What can happen in parallel?
- What are the critical path items?
- Where are the bottlenecks?
5. Estimate and Buffer
- Best case, likely case, worst case
- Add 20-30% buffer for unknowns
- Account for review/testing time
- Include contingency for risks
6. Assign and Track
- Who owns each task?
- What skills are required?
- How will progress be tracked?
- When are check-ins scheduled?
Task Sizing Guidelines
Too Large (>2 days):
- Break into subtasks
- Hard to estimate accurately
- Difficult to track progress
- Blocks other work too long
Well-Sized (2-8 hours):
- Clear deliverable
- One person can complete
- Progress visible daily
- Easy to estimate
Too Small (<1 hour):
- May be over-planning
- Too much overhead
- Combine related micro-tasks
Output Format
## Project: [Name]
**Goal**: [Clear end state]
**Timeline**: [Duration]
**Team**: [People and roles]
**Constraints**: [Budget, tech, deadlines]
---
## Milestones
| # | Milestone | Target Date | Owner | Success Criteria |
|---|-----------|-------------|-------|------------------|
| 1 | [Name] | [Date] | [Person] | [How you know it's done] |
---
## Phase 1: [Phase Name] (Timeline)
| Task | Effort | Owner | Depends On | Done Criteria |
|------|--------|-------|------------|---------------|
| [Task name] | [Hours] | [Person] | [Dependencies] | [Definition of done] |
## Phase 2: [Phase Name] (Timeline)
[Continue for each phase]
---
## Dependencies Map
[Task A] ──> [Task B] ──> [Task D] ├──> [Task C] ──┘
---
## Risks & Mitigation
| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation |
|------|--------|-------------|------------|
| [Risk description] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [How to prevent/reduce] |
---
## Resource Allocation
| Role | Hours/Week | Key Responsibilities |
|------|------------|---------------------|
| [Role] | [Hours] | [What they focus on] |
Estimation Techniques
Three-Point Estimation
Optimistic (O): Best case scenario
Most Likely (M): Expected case
Pessimistic (P): Worst case scenario
Expected = (O + 4M + P) / 6
T-Shirt Sizing
- XS: < 2 hours
- S: 2-4 hours
- M: 4-8 hours (1 day)
- L: 2-3 days
- XL: 1 week
Break down anything larger than XL
Planning Poker
For team estimation, use Fibonacci: 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13 story points
Example
User Request: "Plan a website redesign. Team: 1 designer, 2 developers. Deadline: 6 weeks."
Response:
Project: Company Website Redesign
Goal: Launch redesigned website with improved UX and modern design Timeline: 6 weeks Team: 1 designer, 2 developers Constraints: Must maintain all existing functionality, no budget for new tools
Milestones
| # | Milestone | Target Date | Owner | Success Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Design Approved | End Week 2 | Designer | Stakeholders sign off on mockups |
| 2 | Development Complete | End Week 5 | Dev Team | All pages functional in staging |
| 3 | Launch | End Week 6 | All | Site live, no critical bugs |
Phase 1: Discovery & Design (Weeks 1-2)
| Task | Effort | Owner | Depends On | Done Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audit current site | 4h | Designer | - | List of pages, features, pain points |
| Stakeholder interviews | 4h | Designer | - | Requirements doc with priorities |
| Create sitemap | 2h | Designer | Audit | Updated sitemap approved |
| Design wireframes | 8h | Designer | Sitemap | Lo-fi wireframes for all pages |
| Design homepage mockup | 8h | Designer | Wireframes | Hi-fi mockup with branding |
| Design page templates | 12h | Designer | Homepage | Templates for all page types |
| Design review & revisions | 8h | Designer | Templates | Stakeholder approval received |
Total Effort: 46 hours (~6 days for 1 designer)
Phase 2: Development Setup (Week 3)
| Task | Effort | Owner | Depends On | Done Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Set up dev environment | 4h | Dev 1 | - | Local dev working, Git repo ready |
| Choose tech stack | 2h | Dev 1 | - | Decision doc: framework, libraries |
| Set up CI/CD pipeline | 4h | Dev 1 | Dev env | auto-deploy to staging on merge |
| Create component library | 12h | Dev 1 | Design approval | Reusable components built |
| Set up CMS | 6h | Dev 2 | Tech stack | CMS installed, admin access working |
Total Effort: 28 hours (~3.5 days for 2 devs)
Phase 3: Page Development (Weeks 4-5)
| Task | Effort | Owner | Depends On | Done Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Develop homepage | 16h | Dev 2 | Components | Homepage matches design, responsive |
| Develop about page | 8h | Dev 1 | Homepage | Page complete, responsive |
| Develop service pages | 16h | Dev 1+2 | Homepage | All service pages done |
| Develop blog template | 12h | Dev 2 | Components | Blog posts display correctly |
| Develop contact page | 6h | Dev 1 | About page | Form working, sends emails |
| CMS integration | 12h | Dev 2 | All pages | Content editable in CMS |
| Mobile responsive testing | 8h | Dev 1 | All pages | Works on mobile/tablet/desktop |
| Cross-browser testing | 6h | Dev 2 | Responsive | Works in Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge |
Total Effort: 84 hours (~10 days for 2 devs)
Phase 4: QA & Launch (Week 6)
| Task | Effort | Owner | Depends On | Done Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content migration | 8h | Dev 2 | CMS ready | All content moved to new site |
| SEO optimization | 4h | Dev 1 | Migration | Meta tags, sitemaps, redirects |
| Performance optimization | 6h | Dev 1 | All pages | Lighthouse score >90 |
| User acceptance testing | 8h | Designer+Devs | Migration | Stakeholders test and approve |
| Bug fixes | 12h | Devs | UAT | All critical/high bugs fixed |
| DNS/hosting setup | 2h | Dev 1 | Bug fixes | Domain points to new site |
| Launch & monitoring | 4h | All | Everything | Site live, analytics working |
| Post-launch fixes | 8h | Devs | Launch | Address any immediate issues |
Total Effort: 52 hours (~6.5 days for 2 devs + designer)
Dependencies Visualization
Design Approval ──> Components ──> Homepage ──> Other Pages ──> Testing ──> Launch
└──> CMS ────────────────────┘
Critical Path: Design Approval → Components → Homepage → Other Pages → Testing → Launch
Risks & Mitigation
| Risk | Impact | Probability | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design feedback delays | High | Medium | Schedule reviews in advance, limit revision rounds to 2 |
| Scope creep | High | High | Lock requirements after Week 1, document any new requests for Phase 2 |
| Content not ready | Medium | Medium | Start content migration early (Week 4), use placeholders if needed |
| Technical issues | Medium | Low | Leave buffer in Week 5-6, have backup plan for hosting |
| Team member sick | Medium | Low | Cross-train devs, designer can do basic HTML/CSS if needed |
Resource Allocation
| Role | Hours/Week | Weeks Active | Key Responsibilities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Designer | 40h | Weeks 1-2, 6 | Design, stakeholder management, UAT |
| Developer 1 | 40h | Weeks 3-6 | Architecture, dev setup, page development |
| Developer 2 | 40h | Weeks 3-6 | CMS, page development, testing |
Total Effort: ~210 hours across 6 weeks
Weekly Checkpoints
- Monday standup: Progress updates, blockers
- Friday review: Demo completed work, plan next week
- Weeks 2, 4, 6: Milestone reviews with stakeholders
Success Metrics
- Launch on time (Week 6)
- No critical bugs at launch
- Lighthouse performance score >90
- Stakeholder approval on design
- All existing functionality maintained
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
fact-checker
Systematic fact verification and misinformation identification using evidence-based analysis. Use when: verifying claims, checking facts, identifying misinformation, evaluating source credibility, or when user asks to "fact check", "verify", "is this true", or mentions claims that need validation.
code-reviewer
Thorough code review with focus on security, performance, and best practices. Use when: reviewing code, performing security audits, checking for code quality, reviewing pull requests, or when user mentions code review, PR review, security vulnerabilities, performance issues.
decision-helper
Structured decision-making frameworks for evaluating options and making informed choices. Use when: making decisions, evaluating options, weighing trade-offs, or when user needs help choosing between alternatives, analyzing pros/cons, or making structured decisions.
sprint-planner
Agile sprint planning with story estimation, capacity planning, and sprint goal setting. Use when: planning sprints, estimating stories, defining sprint goals, managing sprint backlogs, or when user mentions sprint planning, agile, scrum, story points, or sprint capacity.
deep-research
Comprehensive research assistant that synthesizes information from multiple sources with citations. Use when: conducting in-depth research, gathering sources, writing research summaries, analyzing topics from multiple perspectives, or when user mentions research, investigation, or needs synthesized analysis with citations.
meeting-notes
Structured meeting summaries with action items, decisions, and key discussion points. Use when: taking meeting notes, summarizing discussions, tracking action items, or when user mentions meeting notes, minutes, action items, or needs structured meeting documentation.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?