Agent skill

plan:findings:create

Retroactively create findings for a plan by reviewing completed phases. Use when findings weren't recorded during implementation and need to be extracted after the fact.

Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/data/plan-findings-create

SKILL.md

Plan Findings Create Skill

Retroactively extract findings from completed plan phases when findings weren't recorded during implementation.

Process

  1. Identify the target plan:

    • If the user provides a plan number (e.g., /plan:findings:create 0018), use that plan directly
    • If no number is provided, scan for in-progress plans:
      • Look for plans/*/task-list.md files (exclude plans/archive/)
      • Check which plans have completed tasks but no findings/ directory (or sparse findings)
      • If one plan qualifies, use it
      • If multiple plans qualify, list them and ask the user to choose
      • If no plans qualify, check plans/archive/ and offer those
  2. Gather implementation context:

    Read the plan's state to understand what was done:

    • Read implementation-plan.md for the intended approach
    • Read task-list.md to identify completed phases and tasks
    • Read .plan-state.json for:
      • commits array — commit SHAs from completed phases
      • last_session_notes — notes about what happened
      • current_task — where work stopped
    • Read task files in tasks/ for what was planned vs. what may have changed
  3. Review commits for each completed phase:

    For each commit SHA in .plan-state.json:

    • Run git log --format='%H %s' <sha> to get the commit message
    • Run git diff <sha>~1..<sha> --stat to see what files changed
    • Run git diff <sha>~1..<sha> to review the actual changes
    • Compare changes against what the task files specified

    If no commits are recorded but tasks are checked off:

    • Use git log --oneline to find likely commits by message pattern (feat(plan-NNNN))
    • Review those commits instead
  4. Identify findings by comparing plan vs. reality:

    For each completed task/phase, look for:

    • Diversions: Code that differs from what the task file specified. Why did the approach change?
    • Discoveries: Unexpected behavior encountered. New understanding of how the code works.
    • Plan errors: Tasks that assumed something incorrect. Missing steps that had to be improvised.
    • TODOs: Comments with TODO, FIXME, HACK, or WORKAROUND in the committed code.
    • Cleanup items: Code that works but could be improved. Temporary scaffolding left in place.
    • Notes: Important context that future work should know about.

    Also search the committed code:

    • Grep for TODO, FIXME, HACK, WORKAROUND, XXX in changed files
    • Look for commented-out code or temporary implementations
    • Check test files for #[ignore] or @skip markers
  5. Present findings to the user:

    **Plan:** `plans/NNNN-feature-name/`
    **Phases reviewed:** N completed phases (M commits)
    **Findings identified:** K total
    
    | # | Finding | Type | Phase/Task | Source |
    |---|---------|------|------------|--------|
    | 1 | [Short title] | diversion | Phase 2 / Task 2.1 | Commit abc1234 |
    | 2 | [Short title] | todo | Phase 3 / Task 3.2 | TODO in src/foo.rs:42 |
    | 3 | [Short title] | discovery | Phase 1 / Task 1.3 | Commit def5678 |
    
    Should I write these as finding files in `plans/NNNN-name/findings/`?
    You can adjust, add, or remove findings before I write them.
    
  6. Wait for user approval before writing findings.

  7. Write finding files:

    • Create plans/NNNN-name/findings/ directory if it doesn't exist

    • Write each finding as an individual markdown file

    • Use descriptive filenames: findings/todo-cleanup-unused-helpers.md

    • Follow the standard finding format:

      markdown
      # Finding: Short Title
      
      **Type:** discovery | diversion | plan-error | note | todo | cleanup
      **Task:** 2.1
      **Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
      **Source:** Commit abc1234 | TODO in src/foo.rs:42 | Observed during review
      
      ## Details
      [What was found/changed/wrong]
      
      ## Impact
      [How this affects the current plan or future work]
      
      ## Action Items
      - [ ] Concrete next step (if any)
      
  8. Report results:

    **Findings written:** N files in `plans/NNNN-name/findings/`
    
    - findings/diversion-changed-routing-approach.md
    - findings/todo-cleanup-unused-helpers.md
    - findings/discovery-diamond-attachment-behavior.md
    
    Run `/plan:findings:resume NNNN` to triage these into issues and research.
    

When to Use This Skill

  • A plan has completed phases but no findings/ directory
  • You finished implementing and forgot to record findings along the way
  • You want to do a retrospective review of what changed vs. what was planned
  • Before archiving a plan, to capture learnings

Example Output


Plan: plans/0018-lr-rl-remaining-fixes/ Phases reviewed: 3 completed phases (3 commits) Findings identified: 4 total

# Finding Type Phase/Task Source
1 Router needed separate LR/RL backward path diversion Phase 2 / Task 2.1 Commit 9b85567
2 render_edge has TODO for multi-segment labels todo Phase 3 / Task 3.2 TODO in src/render/edge.rs:187
3 Plan assumed waypoints always ordered top-to-bottom plan-error Phase 2 / Task 2.3 Commit 7b7e7f0
4 Diamond attachment points need rank-aware sorting discovery Phase 1 / Task 1.2 Commit 0d66d6c

Should I write these as finding files in plans/0018-lr-rl-remaining-fixes/findings/?


Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results