Agent skill

pdf-text-extractor

Download PDFs (when available) and extract plain text to support full-text evidence, writing `papers/fulltext_index.jsonl` and `papers/fulltext/*.txt`. **Trigger**: PDF download, fulltext, extract text, papers/pdfs, 全文抽取, 下载PDF. **Use when**: `queries.md` 设置 `evidence_mode: fulltext`(或你明确需要全文证据)并希望为 paper notes/claims 提供更强 evidence。 **Skip if**: `evidence_mode: abstract`(默认);或你不希望进行下载/抽取(成本/权限/时间)。 **Network**: fulltext 下载通常需要网络(除非你手工提供 PDF 缓存在 `papers/pdfs/`)。 **Guardrail**: 缓存下载到 `papers/pdfs/`;默认不覆盖已有抽取文本(除非显式要求重抽)。

Stars 377
Forks 25

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills/tree/main/.codex/skills/pdf-text-extractor

SKILL.md

PDF Text Extractor

Optionally collect full-text snippets to deepen evidence beyond abstracts.

This skill is intentionally conservative: in many survey runs, abstract/snippet mode is enough and avoids heavy downloads.

Inputs

  • papers/core_set.csv (expects paper_id, title, and ideally pdf_url/arxiv_id/url)
  • Optional: outline/mapping.tsv (to prioritize mapped papers)

Outputs

  • papers/fulltext_index.jsonl (one record per attempted paper)
  • Side artifacts:
    • papers/pdfs/<paper_id>.pdf (cached downloads)
    • papers/fulltext/<paper_id>.txt (extracted text)

Decision: evidence mode

  • queries.md can set evidence_mode: "abstract" | "fulltext".
    • abstract (default template): do not download; write an index that clearly records skipping.
    • fulltext: download PDFs (when possible) and extract text to papers/fulltext/.

Local PDFs Mode

When you cannot/should not download PDFs (restricted network, rate limits, no permission), provide PDFs manually and run in “local PDFs only” mode.

  • PDF naming convention: papers/pdfs/<paper_id>.pdf where <paper_id> matches papers/core_set.csv.
  • Set - evidence_mode: "fulltext" in queries.md.
  • Run: python .codex/skills/pdf-text-extractor/scripts/run.py --workspace <ws> --local-pdfs-only

If PDFs are missing, the script writes a to-do list:

  • output/MISSING_PDFS.md (human-readable summary)
  • papers/missing_pdfs.csv (machine-readable list)

Workflow (heuristic)

  1. Read papers/core_set.csv.
  2. If outline/mapping.tsv exists, prioritize mapped papers first.
  3. For each selected paper (fulltext mode):
    • resolve pdf_url (use pdf_url, else derive from arxiv_id/url when possible)
    • download to papers/pdfs/<paper_id>.pdf if missing
    • extract a reasonable prefix of text to papers/fulltext/<paper_id>.txt
    • append/update a JSONL record in papers/fulltext_index.jsonl with status + stats
  4. Never overwrite existing extracted text unless explicitly requested (delete the .txt to re-extract).

Quality checklist

  • papers/fulltext_index.jsonl exists and is non-empty.
  • If evidence_mode: "fulltext": at least a small but non-trivial subset has extracted text (strict mode blocks if extraction coverage is near-zero).
  • If evidence_mode: "abstract": the index records clearly reflect skip status (no downloads attempted).

Script

Quick Start

  • python .codex/skills/pdf-text-extractor/scripts/run.py --help
  • python .codex/skills/pdf-text-extractor/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace_dir>

All Options

  • --max-papers <n>: cap number of papers processed (can be overridden by queries.md)
  • --max-pages <n>: extract at most N pages per PDF
  • --min-chars <n>: minimum extracted chars to count as OK
  • --sleep <sec>: delay between downloads
  • --local-pdfs-only: do not download; only use papers/pdfs/<paper_id>.pdf if present
  • queries.md supports: evidence_mode, fulltext_max_papers, fulltext_max_pages, fulltext_min_chars

Examples

  • Abstract mode (no downloads):
    • Set - evidence_mode: "abstract" in queries.md, then run the script (it will emit papers/fulltext_index.jsonl with skip statuses)
  • Fulltext mode with local PDFs only:
    • Set - evidence_mode: "fulltext" in queries.md, put PDFs under papers/pdfs/, then run: python .codex/skills/pdf-text-extractor/scripts/run.py --workspace <ws> --local-pdfs-only
  • Fulltext mode with smaller budget:
    • python .codex/skills/pdf-text-extractor/scripts/run.py --workspace <ws> --max-papers 20 --max-pages 4 --min-chars 1200

Notes

  • Downloads are cached under papers/pdfs/; extracted text is cached under papers/fulltext/.
  • The script does not overwrite existing extracted text unless you delete the .txt file.

Troubleshooting

Issue: no PDFs are available to download

Fix:

  • Use evidence_mode: abstract (default) or provide local PDFs under papers/pdfs/ and rerun with --local-pdfs-only.

Issue: extracted text is empty/garbled

Fix:

  • Try a different extraction backend if supported; otherwise mark the paper as abstract evidence level and avoid strong fulltext claims.

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

thesis-compile-review

对中文毕业论文进行编译、warning 分级、模板模式检查、数据与引用复查,并把问题回写成可继续迭代的 review checklist。 **Trigger**: 毕业论文编译检查, thesis compile review, warning 分级, 终稿复查, main.pdf 检查. **Use when**: 论文已经回写到 TeX 交付层,需要确认是否真正达到“可提交”的质量,而不是只做到能编译。 **Skip if**: 还处于中间层重构阶段,`chapters/*.tex` 尚未形成稳定交付稿。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里重构章节主线;如果发现结构问题,明确回退到上游修复。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

front-matter-writer

Write the survey's front matter files (Abstract, Introduction, Related Work, Discussion, Conclusion) in paper voice, with high citation density and a single evidence-policy paragraph. **Trigger**: front matter writer, introduction writer, related work writer, abstract writer, discussion writer, conclusion writer, 引言, 相关工作, 摘要, 讨论, 结论. **Use when**: you are in C5 (prose allowed) and need the paper-like shell to stop the draft reading like stitched subsections. **Skip if**: `Approve C2` is missing in `DECISIONS.md`, or `citations/ref.bib` is missing. **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: no invented facts/citations; no pipeline jargon in final prose; no repeated evidence disclaimers; only use keys present in `citations/ref.bib`.

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

thesis-question-list

维护中文毕业论文的 `codex_md/question_list.md`:把本轮问题、边界、优先级、协作方案和验收口径结构化,作为整条 thesis pipeline 的控制面。 **Trigger**: 毕业论文问题清单, thesis question list, 论文修改清单, 本轮目标, 结构问题梳理, review问题整理. **Use when**: 你已经有一批材料或上一轮 review 结果,需要明确这一轮到底修什么、不修什么,并给后续重构与编译复查提供统一入口。 **Skip if**: 当前只是在做一次性局部措辞修改,且没有形成新一轮结构/证据/编译问题。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里写正文;不把问题单写成长篇散文;每条问题必须可执行、可验收。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

novelty-matrix

Create a novelty/prior-work matrix comparing the submission’s contributions against related work (overlaps vs deltas). **Trigger**: novelty matrix, prior-work matrix, overlap/delta, 相关工作对比, 新颖性矩阵. **Use when**: peer review 中评估 novelty/positioning,需要把贡献与相关工作逐项对齐并写出差异点证据。 **Skip if**: 缺少 claims(先跑 `claims-extractor`)或你不打算做新颖性定位分析。 **Network**: none (retrieval of additional related work is out-of-scope unless provided). **Guardrail**: 明确 overlap 与 delta;尽量给出可追溯证据来源(来自稿件/引用/作者陈述)。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

protocol-writer

Write a systematic review protocol into `output/PROTOCOL.md` (databases, queries, inclusion/exclusion, time window, extraction fields). **Trigger**: protocol, PRISMA, systematic review, inclusion/exclusion, 检索式, 纳入排除. **Use when**: systematic review pipeline 的起点(C1),需要先锁定 protocol 再开始 screening/extraction。 **Skip if**: 不是做 systematic review(或 protocol 已经锁定且不允许修改)。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: protocol 必须包含可执行的检索与筛选规则;需要 HUMAN 签字后才能进入 screening。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

rubric-writer

Write a rubric-based peer review report (`output/REVIEW.md`) using extracted claims and evidence gaps (novelty/soundness/clarity/impact). **Trigger**: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md. **Use when**: peer-review pipeline 的最后阶段(C3),已有 `output/CLAIMS.md` + `output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md`(以及可选 novelty matrix)。 **Skip if**: 上游产物未就绪(claims/evidence gaps 缺失)或你不打算输出完整审稿报告。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 给可执行建议(actionable feedback),并覆盖 novelty/soundness/clarity/impact;避免泛泛而谈。

377 25
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results