Agent skill

owasp-security

Stars 0
Forks 0

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/nikhillinit/Updog_restore/tree/main/.claude/skills/owasp-security

SKILL.md

OWASP Security Best Practices Skill

Apply these security standards when writing or reviewing code.

Quick Reference: OWASP Top 10:2025

# Vulnerability Key Prevention
A01 Broken Access Control Deny by default, enforce server-side, verify ownership
A02 Security Misconfiguration Harden configs, disable defaults, minimize features
A03 Supply Chain Failures Lock versions, verify integrity, audit dependencies
A04 Cryptographic Failures TLS 1.2+, AES-256-GCM, Argon2/bcrypt for passwords
A05 Injection Parameterized queries, input validation, safe APIs
A06 Insecure Design Threat model, rate limit, design security controls
A07 Auth Failures MFA, check breached passwords, secure sessions
A08 Integrity Failures Sign packages, SRI for CDN, safe serialization
A09 Logging Failures Log security events, structured format, alerting
A10 Exception Handling Fail-closed, hide internals, log with context

Security Code Review Checklist

When reviewing code, check for these issues:

Input Handling

  • All user input validated server-side
  • Using parameterized queries (not string concatenation)
  • Input length limits enforced
  • Allowlist validation preferred over denylist

Authentication & Sessions

  • Passwords hashed with Argon2/bcrypt (not MD5/SHA1)
  • Session tokens have sufficient entropy (128+ bits)
  • Sessions invalidated on logout
  • MFA available for sensitive operations

Access Control

  • Authorization checked on every request
  • Using object references user cannot manipulate
  • Deny by default policy
  • Privilege escalation paths reviewed

Data Protection

  • Sensitive data encrypted at rest
  • TLS for all data in transit
  • No sensitive data in URLs/logs
  • Secrets in environment/vault (not code)

Error Handling

  • No stack traces exposed to users
  • Fail-closed on errors (deny, not allow)
  • All exceptions logged with context
  • Consistent error responses (no enumeration)

Secure Code Patterns

SQL Injection Prevention

python
# UNSAFE
cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}")

# SAFE
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", (user_id,))

Command Injection Prevention

python
# UNSAFE
os.system(f"convert {filename} output.png")

# SAFE
subprocess.run(["convert", filename, "output.png"], shell=False)

Password Storage

python
# UNSAFE
hashlib.md5(password.encode()).hexdigest()

# SAFE
from argon2 import PasswordHasher
PasswordHasher().hash(password)

Access Control

python
# UNSAFE - No authorization check
@app.route('/api/user/<user_id>')
def get_user(user_id):
    return db.get_user(user_id)

# SAFE - Authorization enforced
@app.route('/api/user/<user_id>')
@login_required
def get_user(user_id):
    if current_user.id != user_id and not current_user.is_admin:
        abort(403)
    return db.get_user(user_id)

Error Handling

python
# UNSAFE - Exposes internals
@app.errorhandler(Exception)
def handle_error(e):
    return str(e), 500

# SAFE - Fail-closed, log context
@app.errorhandler(Exception)
def handle_error(e):
    error_id = uuid.uuid4()
    logger.exception(f"Error {error_id}: {e}")
    return {"error": "An error occurred", "id": str(error_id)}, 500

Fail-Closed Pattern

python
# UNSAFE - Fail-open
def check_permission(user, resource):
    try:
        return auth_service.check(user, resource)
    except Exception:
        return True  # DANGEROUS!

# SAFE - Fail-closed
def check_permission(user, resource):
    try:
        return auth_service.check(user, resource)
    except Exception as e:
        logger.error(f"Auth check failed: {e}")
        return False  # Deny on error

Agentic AI Security (OWASP 2026)

When building or reviewing AI agent systems, check for:

Risk Description Mitigation
ASI01: Goal Hijack Prompt injection alters agent objectives Input sanitization, goal boundaries, behavioral monitoring
ASI02: Tool Misuse Tools used in unintended ways Least privilege, fine-grained permissions, validate I/O
ASI03: Privilege Abuse Credential escalation across agents Short-lived scoped tokens, identity verification
ASI04: Supply Chain Compromised plugins/MCP servers Verify signatures, sandbox, allowlist plugins
ASI05: Code Execution Unsafe code generation/execution Sandbox execution, static analysis, human approval
ASI06: Memory Poisoning Corrupted RAG/context data Validate stored content, segment by trust level
ASI07: Agent Comms Spoofing between agents Authenticate, encrypt, verify message integrity
ASI08: Cascading Failures Errors propagate across systems Circuit breakers, graceful degradation, isolation
ASI09: Trust Exploitation Social engineering via AI Label AI content, user education, verification steps
ASI10: Rogue Agents Compromised agents acting maliciously Behavior monitoring, kill switches, anomaly detection

Agent Security Checklist

  • All agent inputs sanitized and validated
  • Tools operate with minimum required permissions
  • Credentials are short-lived and scoped
  • Third-party plugins verified and sandboxed
  • Code execution happens in isolated environments
  • Agent communications authenticated and encrypted
  • Circuit breakers between agent components
  • Human approval for sensitive operations
  • Behavior monitoring for anomaly detection
  • Kill switch available for agent systems

ASVS 5.0 Key Requirements

Level 1 (All Applications)

  • Passwords minimum 12 characters
  • Check against breached password lists
  • Rate limiting on authentication
  • Session tokens 128+ bits entropy
  • HTTPS everywhere

Level 2 (Sensitive Data)

  • All L1 requirements plus:
  • MFA for sensitive operations
  • Cryptographic key management
  • Comprehensive security logging
  • Input validation on all parameters

Level 3 (Critical Systems)

  • All L1/L2 requirements plus:
  • Hardware security modules for keys
  • Threat modeling documentation
  • Advanced monitoring and alerting
  • Penetration testing validation

Language-Specific Security Quirks

Important: The examples below are illustrative starting points, not exhaustive. When reviewing code, think like a senior security researcher: consider the language's memory model, type system, standard library pitfalls, ecosystem-specific attack vectors, and historical CVE patterns. Each language has deeper quirks beyond what's listed here.

JavaScript / TypeScript

Main Risks: Prototype pollution, XSS, eval injection

javascript
// UNSAFE: Prototype pollution
Object.assign(target, userInput);
// SAFE: Use null prototype or validate keys
Object.assign(Object.create(null), validated);

// UNSAFE: eval injection
eval(userCode);
// SAFE: Never use eval with user input

Watch for: eval(), innerHTML, document.write(), prototype chain manipulation, __proto__

Python

Main Risks: Pickle deserialization, format string injection, shell injection

python
# UNSAFE: Pickle RCE
pickle.loads(user_data)
# SAFE: Use JSON or validate source
json.loads(user_data)

Watch for: pickle, eval(), exec(), os.system(), subprocess with shell=True

SQL (All Dialects)

Main Risks: Injection, privilege escalation, data exfiltration

sql
-- UNSAFE: String concatenation
"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = " + userId

-- SAFE: Parameterized query
-- Use prepared statements in ALL cases

Watch for: Dynamic SQL, EXECUTE IMMEDIATE, stored procedures with dynamic queries, privilege grants

Deep Security Analysis Mindset

When reviewing any language, think like a senior security researcher:

  1. Memory Model: How does the language handle memory? Managed vs manual? GC pauses exploitable?
  2. Type System: Weak typing = type confusion attacks. Look for coercion exploits.
  3. Serialization: Every language has its pickle/Marshal equivalent. All are dangerous.
  4. Concurrency: Race conditions, TOCTOU, atomicity failures specific to the threading model.
  5. FFI Boundaries: Native interop is where type safety breaks down.
  6. Standard Library: Historic CVEs in std libs (Python urllib, Java XML, Ruby OpenSSL).
  7. Package Ecosystem: Typosquatting, dependency confusion, malicious packages.
  8. Build System: Makefile/gradle/npm script injection during builds.
  9. Runtime Behavior: Debug vs release differences (Rust overflow, C++ assertions).
  10. Error Handling: How does the language fail? Silently? With stack traces? Fail-open?

When to Apply This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Writing authentication or authorization code
  • Handling user input or external data
  • Implementing cryptography or password storage
  • Reviewing code for security vulnerabilities
  • Designing API endpoints
  • Building AI agent systems
  • Configuring application security settings
  • Handling errors and exceptions
  • Working with third-party dependencies

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

nikhillinit/Updog_restore

financial-calc-correctness

0 0
Explore
nikhillinit/Updog_restore

statistical-testing

0 0
Explore
nikhillinit/Updog_restore

ui-ux-pro-max

UI/UX design intelligence. 50 styles, 21 palettes, 50 font pairings, 20 charts, 9 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind, shadcn/ui). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app, .html, .tsx, .vue, .svelte. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient. Integrations: shadcn/ui MCP for component search and examples.

0 0
Explore
nikhillinit/Updog_restore

code-reviewer

Comprehensive multi-AI code review system for Python, JavaScript, and TypeScript. Use when reviewing code for quality, security, performance, or best practices. Includes automated analysis scripts, language-specific patterns, and AI collaboration workflows for complex decisions.

0 0
Explore
nikhillinit/Updog_restore

dependency-guardian

Automated dependency management with security scanning, update orchestration, and compatibility validation

0 0
Explore
nikhillinit/Updog_restore

documentation-sync

Detects code/documentation drift, validates examples, generates diagrams, auto-updates documentation

0 0
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results