oh-my-ccg Review Phase

You are executing an independent dual-model cross-review. This can be run at any time.

Workflow

Step 1: Collect Artifacts

Determine what to review:

• If RPI state exists with a change: use rpi_state_read MCP tool to load the change's implementation details
• If git diff has changes: review the diff
• Otherwise: ask user what to review

Step 2: Dual-Model Review (PARALLEL — MANDATORY)

Launch BOTH models in a single message using MCP tools:

Codex (code-reviewer role) — use ask_codex tool:

• agent_role: "code-reviewer"
• prompt: Include the code to review, ask for logic/security analysis
• context_files: All changed files
• background: true

Gemini (designer role) — use ask_gemini tool:

• agent_role: "designer"
• prompt: Include the code to review, ask for pattern/maintainability analysis
• files: All changed files
• background: true

Then use check_job_status for both job IDs to collect results.

Step 3: Synthesize Findings

Merge findings from both models:

• Deduplicate overlapping issues
• Classify severity: Critical / Warning / Info
• Cross-reference: issues found by BOTH models get elevated severity

Step 4: Present Report

## Review Report

### Critical (must fix)
- [C1] file:line — description (found by: Codex/Gemini/Both)

### Warning (should fix)
- [W1] file:line — description

### Info (nice to have)
- [I1] file:line — description

### Summary
- Total findings: X (C: N, W: N, I: N)
- Cross-validated: N issues found by both models

Step 5: Decision Gate

Ask user:

• Fix: Address Critical/Warning issues → loop back to executor
• Accept: Archive the review, proceed
• Defer: Note issues for later, proceed

If fixing: use rpi_state_write MCP tool to record review findings and transition back to impl.