Agent skill

nw-proposal-structure

B2B proposal generation templates, ROI calculator structures, and deal packaging patterns for training, consulting, and enterprise support

Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/other/other/nw-proposal-structure

SKILL.md

Proposal Structure -- B2B Proposal Templates & ROI Calculators

This skill provides proposal generation templates, ROI calculator structures, and deal packaging patterns for training, consulting, and enterprise support proposals.


B2B Proposal Template (7 Sections)

Section 1: Executive Summary (1 page max)

Structure: Mirror -> Stakes -> Outcome.

[MIRROR]: Restate the customer's problem in their own language (from discovery call notes).

[STAKES]: Quantify what happens if the problem persists.
  "If [problem] continues for [timeframe], the impact is [quantified cost]."

[OUTCOME]: One-sentence description of your solution's result.
  "We propose [solution] to achieve [measurable outcome] within [timeframe]."

The executive summary is the only section many decision-makers read. It must stand alone.

Section 2: Understanding Your Situation

Demonstrate deep understanding of the prospect's specific context. Generic problem descriptions signal boilerplate.

CURRENT STATE:
  [Pain documented from discovery call -- use their words]
  [Specific metrics: team size, timeline, budget signals]

ROOT CAUSE:
  [Why the problem exists -- demonstrates analytical depth]
  [Connect to industry-wide challenge they'll recognize]

COST OF INACTION:
  [TCO of doing nothing -- quantified]
  [Timeline: "Every month of delay costs approximately EUR [X]"]

Section 3: Our Recommended Approach

METHODOLOGY:
  [High-level approach -- 3-4 sentences max]
  [Why this approach vs alternatives]

TIMELINE & MILESTONES:
  Phase 1: [What, when, deliverable]
  Phase 2: [What, when, deliverable]
  Phase 3: [What, when, deliverable]

TEAM:
  [Relevant credentials framed to problem/solution fit]
  [Authority signals: publications, conference talks, case studies]

Section 4: Case Study (Social Proof)

Follow Challenge-Solution-Impact structure. Select the case study most similar to the prospect (industry + size + problem).

CHALLENGE:
  [Similar client's problem -- industry and size match]
  [1-2 sentences, specific and quantified]

SOLUTION:
  [What was done and how -- without proprietary detail]
  [Timeline and approach]

IMPACT:
  [Quantified results: %, EUR, time saved, specific metric]
  [At least 2 measurable outcomes]

QUOTE:
  "[Client testimonial]" -- [Name, Title, Company]

If no case study exists yet, use a methodology proof point instead: describe the approach with evidence from industry benchmarks, not fabricated results.

Section 5: Investment (Pricing)

Lead with highest-value option first (anchor). Present Good/Better/Best.

OPTION C -- COMPREHENSIVE (anchor)
  [Full engagement description]
  Investment: EUR [highest price, precise non-round]
  Best for: [who benefits most]

OPTION B -- PROFESSIONAL (target)
  [Core engagement]
  Investment: EUR [target price, precise non-round]
  Best for: [most prospects land here]

OPTION A -- ESSENTIALS (entry)
  [Minimum viable engagement]
  Investment: EUR [lowest price]
  Best for: [risk-averse or budget-constrained]

ROI CALCULATION (for recommended option):
  [See ROI Calculator section below]

Present highest option first -- it anchors perception. The middle option (your actual target) becomes the "reasonable" choice by comparison.

Section 6: Risk Mitigation

WHAT COULD GO WRONG:
  [Acknowledge 2-3 realistic risks -- honesty builds trust]

HOW WE HANDLE IT:
  [Specific mitigation for each risk]
  [SLAs, guarantees, escalation paths if applicable]

REFERENCES:
  [Named contacts available for reference calls]
  [Or: "Happy to connect you with [N] similar clients"]

Section 7: Next Steps

CLEAR CALL TO ACTION:
  [One specific next step -- not "let us know"]
  [e.g., "Reply to confirm Option B and we'll send the SOW by Friday"]

TIMELINE:
  [Decision deadline with genuine reason -- not manufactured urgency]
  [Implementation start date if signed by [date]]

CONTACT:
  [Who to reach, how, response time commitment]

ROI Calculator Template

Inputs (prospect fills in or estimated from discovery)

CURRENT COST BASELINE:
  Headcount doing the job manually: [N] FTEs * EUR [salary] = EUR [total]
  Current tool spend: EUR [annual]
  Error/rework cost: [hours/week] * [hourly_rate] * 52 = EUR [annual]
  Opportunity cost (revenue lost to slowness): EUR [estimated]
  TOTAL ANNUAL COST OF STATUS QUO: EUR [sum]

ENGAGEMENT COSTS:
  Engagement fee: EUR [price]
  Internal time to implement: [hours] * EUR [rate] = EUR [cost]
  Training time (productivity loss): [hours] * [people] * EUR [rate] = EUR [cost]
  TOTAL INVESTMENT: EUR [sum]

Outputs (agent calculates)

PROJECTED ANNUAL SAVINGS:
  [Specific improvement] * [baseline metric] = EUR [savings]
  Conservative estimate: [X]% improvement = EUR [conservative]
  Base estimate: [Y]% improvement = EUR [base]
  Optimistic estimate: [Z]% improvement = EUR [optimistic]

ROI (using conservative estimate):
  First-year ROI = (savings - investment) / investment
  Show as multiple: "[N]x return" (more intuitive than percentage)

PAYBACK PERIOD:
  Investment / (monthly savings) = [N] months
  Show as: "Pays back in [N] months"

COMPARISON:
  "vs hiring [N] FTEs at EUR [salary]/year"
  "vs [alternative solution] at EUR [price]"

Presentation Rules

  • Show ROI as multiple, not percentage: "8.3x return" beats "730% ROI"
  • Show payback in months: "Pays back in 4.2 months"
  • Always state assumptions explicitly: "Assuming a conservative 30% reduction in rework time"
  • Compare to the most expensive alternative (hiring) to anchor favorably
  • Use the prospect's own numbers when available -- estimated numbers carry less weight

Good/Better/Best Tier Design

For packaging training and consulting offers into structured tiers.

ESSENTIALS (Good) -- Entry point, reduce purchase risk
  Purpose: Land-and-expand. Prove value quickly.
  Include: Core deliverable only (e.g., 1-day workshop)
  Price: 30-40% of Professional tier
  Upgrade trigger: "After experiencing day 1, most teams want the full program"

PROFESSIONAL (Better) -- Target tier, optimal value/price
  Purpose: Main revenue driver. 60-70% of customers land here.
  Include: Core + advanced (e.g., 2-day workshop + 4 coaching sessions)
  Price: 100% (baseline for tier math)
  Frame as: The obvious choice

COMPREHENSIVE (Best) -- Anchor, capture high-value accounts
  Purpose: Set price perception AND serve enterprise needs.
  Include: Everything + premium (e.g., full engagement + retainer + async support)
  Price: 2.5-4x Professional tier
  Frame as: Premium investment for teams that want maximum impact

Tier design anti-patterns:

  • All three tiers too similar (no clear reason to upgrade)
  • Price gaps too small (undermines anchor effect)
  • Essentials tier too generous (no upgrade motivation)
  • Best tier unrealistic (anchor loses credibility if absurd)

Cialdini Framing Layer

Apply before the proposal content -- these are pre-communication elements.

Reciprocity

Before sending a proposal, provide genuine value first: a relevant insight, industry data point, or brief analysis specific to their context. No ask attached.

Subject: [Their Industry] insight I thought you'd find useful

Hi [Name],

I came across this [data/case/analysis] on [their specific challenge] and thought it was directly relevant -- no strings attached.

[1-2 sentences of genuine value with link or specific insight]

Happy to dig deeper on any of this if useful.

Social Proof

Select proof from verified sources. Match to prospect's industry, size, and problem.

Companies similar to [Prospect] -- [industry], [size range] -- have used this approach:

* [Company A]: [specific measurable result]
* [Company B]: [specific measurable result]

Happy to connect you with any of them directly.

Authority

Surface genuine credentials most relevant to this specific prospect.

[Third-party data source] shows [claim relevant to their problem]. Our work with [named context] is built on this foundation.

Scarcity (genuine only)

Only when real constraints exist. Never fabricate.

I want to be direct about timing: we have capacity for [N] engagements in [quarter] and [X] are committed.

This isn't a sales tactic -- it's a genuine constraint. If timing works, I want to make sure we can deliver at the level you'd expect.

Proposal Quality Checklist

Before finalizing any proposal, verify:

  • Executive summary stands alone (decision-maker reads only this)
  • Problem description uses prospect's own words (not generic)
  • ROI calculation uses stated assumptions (not inflated)
  • Pricing leads with highest option (anchor)
  • All claims are verifiable (no fabricated evidence)
  • Case study matches prospect profile (industry + size)
  • Next steps are specific (not "let us know")
  • Risk mitigation section present (honesty builds trust)
  • No false scarcity or manufactured urgency
  • Tone is expert and direct, not salesy or desperate

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results