Agent skill

nondominium-holochain-tryorama-testing

Specialized skill for testing nondominium Holochain applications with Tryorama, providing comprehensive test patterns, agent simulation workflows, performance testing, and multi-agent scenario testing. Use when writing Tryorama tests, debugging zome interactions, or validating Holochain DNA functionality.

Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/testing/nondominium-holochain-tryorama-testing-sensorica-nondominium

SKILL.md

Nondominium Holochain Tryorama Testing

This skill transforms Claude into a specialized Tryorama testing assistant, providing expert guidance for testing Holochain applications with multi-agent scenarios, performance testing, and comprehensive validation workflows.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when:

  • Writing Tryorama tests for Holochain zomes
  • Creating multi-agent test scenarios
  • Testing cross-zome interactions and workflows
  • Validating ValueFlows economic flows
  • Performance testing and load testing
  • Debugging Holochain DNA functionality
  • Testing capability-based access control
  • Validating PPR (Private Permissioned Requests) systems

Do NOT use for:

  • DNA code development (use the DNA development skill)
  • Frontend/UI development (use appropriate web development skills)
  • Generic testing outside Holochain context

Core Testing Architecture

Test File Organization

Tests are organized by zome and functionality in a 4-layer testing strategy:

tests/src/nondominium/
├── person/              # Person zome tests
│   ├── person-foundation.test.ts
│   ├── person-integration.test.ts
│   └── person-scenarios.test.ts
├── resource/            # Resource zome tests
│   ├── resource-foundation.test.ts
│   ├── resource-integration.test.ts
│   └── resource-scenarios.test.ts
├── governance/          # Governance zome tests
│   ├── governance-foundation.test.ts
│   ├── governance-integration.test.ts
│   ├── governance-scenarios.test.ts
│   └── ppr-system/      # PPR system tests
│       ├── ppr-foundation.test.ts
│       ├── ppr-integration.test.ts
│       ├── ppr-scenarios.test.ts
│       ├── ppr-cryptography.test.ts
│       └── ppr-debug.test.ts
└── utils/               # Shared testing utilities
    ├── common.ts
    ├── agents.ts
    └── fixtures.ts

4-Layer Testing Strategy

  1. Foundation Tests: Basic zome function calls and connectivity
  2. Integration Tests: Cross-zome interactions and multi-agent scenarios
  3. Scenario Tests: Complete user journeys and workflows
  4. Performance Tests: Load and stress testing for PPR systems

Testing Workflows

1. Test Setup and Agent Management

typescript
import { CallableCell, AgentPubKey, ActionHash } from "@holochain/client";
import { assert, test, describe } from "vitest";

// Common test setup
describe("Person Zome Tests", () => {
  let alice: AgentPubKey;
  let bob: AgentPubKey;
  let aliceCell: CallableCell;
  let bobCell: CallableCell;

  test("setup agents and cells", async () => {
    const conductor = await Conductor.singleton();

    alice = await generateAgentPubKey();
    bob = await generateAgentPubKey();

    aliceCell = await conductor.createCell({
      app_bundle: APP_BUNDLE,
      agent_key: alice,
    });

    bobCell = await conductor.createCell({
      app_bundle: APP_BUNDLE,
      agent_key: bob,
    });
  });
});

2. Foundation Test Patterns

Basic Function Testing:

typescript
test("create person entry", async () => {
  const personInput = {
    name: "Alice Smith",
    nickname: "alice",
    bio: "Test user for Person zome",
    user_type: "accountable",
    email: "alice@example.com",
    time_zone: "UTC",
    location: "Test Location",
  };

  const result = await aliceCell.callZome({
    zome_name: "zome_person",
    fn_name: "create_person",
    payload: personInput,
  });

  assert.ok(result.person_hash);
  assert.equal(result.person.name, "Alice Smith");
});

Error Testing:

typescript
test("invalid person creation fails", async () => {
  const invalidInput = {
    name: "", // Empty name should fail
    nickname: "test",
    bio: "Invalid person",
    user_type: "invalid_type", // Invalid user type
    email: "not-an-email",
    time_zone: "UTC",
    location: "Test",
  };

  try {
    await aliceCell.callZome({
      zome_name: "zome_person",
      fn_name: "create_person",
      payload: invalidInput,
    });
    assert.fail("Should have thrown an error");
  } catch (error) {
    assert.ok(error.message.includes("Validation failed"));
  }
});

3. Integration Test Patterns

Cross-Zome Testing:

typescript
test("resource creation with person assignment", async () => {
  // Create person first
  const personResult = await aliceCell.callZome({
    zome_name: "zome_person",
    fn_name: "create_person",
    payload: samplePersonInput(),
  });

  // Create resource linked to person
  const resourceInput = {
    name: "Test Resource",
    resource_spec_hash: generateActionHash(),
    current_state: "available",
    accountable_agent: alice,
  };

  const resourceResult = await aliceCell.callZome({
    zome_name: "zome_resource",
    fn_name: "create_economic_resource",
    payload: resourceInput,
  });

  assert.ok(resourceResult.resource_hash);
  assert.equal(resourceResult.resource.accountable_agent, alice);
});

Multi-Agent Scenarios:

typescript
test("multi-agent resource transfer", async () => {
  // Alice creates resource
  const resource = await createResource(aliceCell);

  // Alice transfers to Bob
  const transferInput = {
    resource_hash: resource.resource_hash,
    receiver: bob,
    quantity: 1,
    note: "Transfer test",
  };

  const transferResult = await aliceCell.callZome({
    zome_name: "zome_gouvernance",
    fn_name: "log_economic_event",
    payload: {
      ...transferInput,
      action: "transfer",
      provider: alice,
      receiver: bob,
      resource_inventoried_as: resource.resource_hash,
      generate_pprs: true,
    },
  });

  assert.ok(transferResult.event_hash);

  // Verify Bob can access the resource
  const bobResources = await bobCell.callZome({
    zome_name: "zome_resource",
    fn_name: "get_my_resources",
    payload: {},
  });

  assert.equal(bobResources.length, 1);
});

4. PPR System Testing

PPR Issuance Testing:

typescript
test("PPR issuance for resource transfer", async () => {
  // Create resource and transfer (from previous test)
  const resource = await createResource(aliceCell);
  await transferResource(aliceCell, bobCell, resource);

  // Check PPRs were generated
  const aliceClaims = await aliceCell.callZome({
    zome_name: "zome_gouvernance",
    fn_name: "get_my_participation_claims",
    payload: { claim_type_filter: "CustodyTransfer" },
  });

  const bobClaims = await bobCell.callZome({
    zome_name: "zome_gouvernance",
    fn_name: "get_my_participation_claims",
    payload: { claim_type_filter: "CustodyAcceptance" },
  });

  assert.equal(aliceClaims.claims.length, 1);
  assert.equal(bobClaims.claims.length, 1);

  // Validate bi-directional receipt structure
  assert(validateBiDirectionalReceipts(aliceClaims.claims.map((c) => c[1])));
});

Performance Testing:

typescript
test("PPR system performance benchmarks", async () => {
  const profiler = new PPRTestProfiler();
  profiler.start();

  // Issue multiple PPRs
  const receiptCount = 50;
  for (let i = 0; i < receiptCount; i++) {
    const claim = sampleParticipationClaim("ResourceCreation", {
      notes: `Performance test receipt ${i + 1}`,
    });

    await issueParticipationReceipts(aliceCell, claim);
    profiler.recordReceipt();
  }

  const metrics = profiler.finish();

  // Check performance benchmarks
  assert(
    metrics.executionTime < PPR_PERFORMANCE_BENCHMARKS.BULK_RECEIPT_PROCESSING,
  );
  assert.equal(metrics.receiptCount, receiptCount);
});

Stress Testing:

typescript
test("PPR system stress testing", async () => {
  const stressResult = await stressTesterPPRIssuance(
    aliceCell,
    100, // receipt count
    10, // concurrency level
  );

  assert.equal(stressResult.successRate, 1.0);
  assert(stressResult.averageTime < 100); // ms per receipt
  assert.equal(stressResult.errors.length, 0);
});

Advanced Testing Patterns

1. Test Fixtures and Data Generation

Sample Data Generators:

typescript
export function samplePersonInput(
  overrides?: Partial<PersonInput>,
): PersonInput {
  return {
    name: "Test User",
    nickname: "testuser",
    bio: "Test user description",
    user_type: "accountable",
    email: "test@example.com",
    time_zone: "UTC",
    location: "Test Location",
    ...overrides,
  };
}

export function sampleParticipationClaim(
  claimType: ParticipationClaimType,
  overrides?: Partial<any>,
): ParticipationReceiptInput {
  return {
    claim_type: claimType,
    counterparty: generateAgentPubKey(),
    fulfills: generateActionHash(),
    fulfilled_by: generateActionHash(),
    performance_metrics: samplePerformanceMetrics(),
    ...overrides,
  };
}

Test Scenario Definitions:

typescript
export const PPR_TEST_SCENARIOS: PPRTestScenario[] = [
  {
    name: "Basic Resource Creation",
    description: "Simple resource creation with standard metrics",
    claimType: "ResourceCreation",
    expectedReceiptCount: 2,
    performanceMetrics: {
      quality: 0.8,
      timeliness: 0.8,
      communication: 0.7,
      overall_satisfaction: 0.7,
      reliability: 0.8,
      notes: "Basic resource creation metrics",
    },
    shouldRequireSignature: true,
  },
  // ... more scenarios
];

2. Multi-Agent Test Scenarios

Complex Interaction Matrix:

typescript
export const MULTI_AGENT_SCENARIOS: MultiAgentScenario[] = [
  {
    agentCount: 3,
    interactionMatrix: [
      ["ResourceContribution", "ServiceProvision"],
      ["ResourceReception", "KnowledgeSharing"],
      ["ServiceReception", "KnowledgeAcquisition"],
    ],
    expectedTotalReceipts: 6, // 3 agents × 2 interactions each
    scenario_description: "Triangle resource/service/knowledge exchange",
  },
  // ... more complex scenarios
];

Multi-Agent Test Execution:

typescript
test("multi-agent complex interactions", async () => {
  const agents = await setupAgents(4);
  const scenario = MULTI_AGENT_SCENARIOS[1]; // Complex 4-agent scenario

  // Execute interaction matrix
  for (let i = 0; i < agents.length; i++) {
    const agentCell = agents[i].cell;
    const interactions = scenario.interactionMatrix[i];

    for (const claimType of interactions) {
      const claim = sampleParticipationClaim(claimType);
      await issueParticipationReceipts(agentCell, claim);
    }
  }

  // Verify total receipts
  let totalReceipts = 0;
  for (const agent of agents) {
    const claims = await agent.cell.callZome({
      zome_name: "zome_gouvernance",
      fn_name: "get_my_participation_claims",
      payload: {},
    });
    totalReceipts += claims.total_count;
  }

  assert.equal(totalReceipts, scenario.expectedTotalReceipts);
});

3. Performance and Load Testing

Benchmark Testing:

typescript
describe("Performance Benchmarks", () => {
  test("PPR issuance performance", async () => {
    const startTime = performance.now();

    // Issue bi-directional PPRs
    const claim = sampleParticipationClaim("CustodyTransfer");
    await issueParticipationReceipts(aliceCell, claim);

    const duration = performance.now() - startTime;
    assert(
      duration < PPR_PERFORMANCE_BENCHMARKS.BI_DIRECTIONAL_RECEIPT_CREATION,
    );
  });

  test("Reputation aggregation performance", async () => {
    // Create multiple claims first
    for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
      const claim = sampleParticipationClaim("ResourceCreation");
      await issueParticipationReceipts(aliceCell, claim);
    }

    const startTime = performance.now();

    const reputation = await aliceCell.callZome({
      zome_name: "zome_gouvernance",
      fn_name: "derive_reputation_summary",
      payload: {
        period_start: Date.now() - 86400000, // 24 hours ago
        period_end: Date.now(),
      },
    });

    const duration = performance.now() - startTime;
    assert(duration < PPR_PERFORMANCE_BENCHMARKS.REPUTATION_AGGREGATION);
    assert.ok(reputation.summary);
  });
});

4. Cryptographic Testing

Signature Validation Testing:

typescript
test("PPR signature validation", async () => {
  // Create original receipt
  const claim = sampleParticipationClaim("ResourceCreation");
  const originalReceipt = await issueParticipationReceipts(aliceCell, claim);

  // Sign the receipt
  const signInput = {
    data_to_sign: new TextEncoder().encode("test data"),
    counterparty: bob,
  };

  const signatureResult = await aliceCell.callZome({
    zome_name: "zome_gouvernance",
    fn_name: "sign_participation_claim",
    payload: signInput,
  });

  assert.ok(signatureResult.signature);

  // Validate signature chain
  const isValid = validateSignatureChain(
    originalReceipt.provider_claim_hash,
    signatureResult.signed_data_hash,
  );

  assert.isTrue(isValid);
});

Testing Utilities and Helpers

1. Validation Functions

typescript
export function validateBiDirectionalReceipts(
  receiptsRecords: HolochainRecord[],
  expectedCount: number = 2,
): boolean {
  if (receiptsRecords.length !== expectedCount) {
    console.error(
      `Expected ${expectedCount} receipts, got ${receiptsRecords.length}`,
    );
    return false;
  }

  const receipts = decodeRecords(receiptsRecords) as ParticipationReceipt[];
  const claimTypes = receipts.map((r) => r.claim_type);

  // Check for complementary pairs
  const hasContributionReception =
    claimTypes.includes("ResourceContribution") &&
    claimTypes.includes("ResourceReception");
  const hasServiceProvisionReception =
    claimTypes.includes("ServiceProvision") &&
    claimTypes.includes("ServiceReception");

  return hasContributionReception || hasServiceProvisionReception;
}

export function validateReputationDerivation(
  reputation: ReputationSummary,
  expectedMinimumClaims: number = 1,
): boolean {
  return (
    reputation.total_participation_claims >= expectedMinimumClaims &&
    reputation.average_quality_score >= 0 &&
    reputation.average_quality_score <= 5 &&
    reputation.reputation_score >= 0 &&
    reputation.last_activity_timestamp > 0
  );
}

2. Performance Monitoring

typescript
export class PPRTestProfiler {
  private startTime: number = 0;
  private metrics: PPRResourceMetrics = {
    memoryUsage: 0,
    executionTime: 0,
    receiptCount: 0,
    signatureCount: 0,
    validationCount: 0,
  };

  start(): void {
    this.startTime = performance.now();
  }

  recordReceipt(): void {
    this.metrics.receiptCount++;
  }

  recordSignature(): void {
    this.metrics.signatureCount++;
  }

  recordValidation(): void {
    this.metrics.validationCount++;
  }

  finish(): PPRResourceMetrics {
    this.metrics.executionTime = performance.now() - this.startTime;
    this.metrics.memoryUsage = (performance as any).memory?.usedJSHeapSize || 0;
    return { ...this.metrics };
  }
}

3. Stress Testing Framework

typescript
export async function stressTesterPPRIssuance(
  cell: CallableCell,
  receiptCount: number,
  concurrencyLevel: number = 10,
): Promise<{
  totalTime: number;
  averageTime: number;
  successRate: number;
  errors: any[];
}> {
  const startTime = performance.now();
  const errors: any[] = [];
  let successCount = 0;

  // Create batches for concurrent processing
  const batches = [];
  for (let i = 0; i < receiptCount; i += concurrencyLevel) {
    const batchSize = Math.min(concurrencyLevel, receiptCount - i);
    const batch = Array.from({ length: batchSize }, (_, j) =>
      sampleParticipationClaim("ResourceCreation", {
        notes: `Stress test receipt ${i + j + 1}`,
      }),
    );
    batches.push(batch);
  }

  // Process batches
  for (const batch of batches) {
    const promises = batch.map(async (claim) => {
      try {
        await issueParticipationReceipts(cell, claim);
        successCount++;
      } catch (error) {
        errors.push({ claim, error });
      }
    });

    await Promise.all(promises);
  }

  const totalTime = performance.now() - startTime;
  const averageTime = totalTime / receiptCount;
  const successRate = successCount / receiptCount;

  return { totalTime, averageTime, successRate, errors };
}

Test Configuration

Test Timeout and Concurrency

typescript
// vitest.config.ts
export default defineConfig({
  test: {
    timeout: 240000, // 4 minutes for complex scenarios
    concurrency: 1, // Single fork for DHT consistency
    globals: true,
    environment: "node",
  },
});

Performance Benchmarks

typescript
export const PPR_PERFORMANCE_BENCHMARKS = {
  BI_DIRECTIONAL_RECEIPT_CREATION: 1000, // ms
  SIGNATURE_ROUND_TRIP: 200, // ms
  REPUTATION_AGGREGATION: 1500, // ms
  BULK_RECEIPT_PROCESSING: 5000, // ms for 100 receipts
  CROSS_AGENT_VALIDATION: 800, // ms
};

Running Tests

Test Execution Commands

bash
# Run all tests
bun run tests

# Run specific test files (use filename pattern, not path)
bun run tests person-foundation
bun run tests ppr-integration
bun run tests resource-scenarios

# Run specific zome tests (use partial file name patterns)
bun run tests person
bun run tests gouvernance
bun run tests ppr

Test Development Tips

  1. Test Isolation: Use .only() on describe or it blocks to run specific tests during development:
typescript
describe.only('specific test suite', () => { ... })  // Run only this suite
it.only('specific test', async () => { ... })       // Run only this test
test.only('specific test', async () => { ... })       // Run only this test
  1. Rust Debugging: Use the warn! macro in Rust zome functions to log debugging information that will appear in test output:
rust
warn!("Debug info: variable = {:?}", some_variable);
warn!("Checkpoint reached in function_name");
warn!("Processing entry: {}", entry_hash);

The warn! macro output is visible in the test console, making it invaluable for debugging complex Holochain interactions and understanding execution flow during test development.

Best Practices

DO ✅

  • Use structured test data generators for consistent test scenarios
  • Implement comprehensive validation helpers for complex data structures
  • Test both success and failure cases for all zome functions
  • Use performance benchmarks to catch regressions
  • Create multi-agent scenarios to test real-world usage
  • Implement proper test isolation and cleanup
  • Use descriptive test names and scenarios
  • Test cross-zome interactions thoroughly
  • Validate bi-directional receipt structures for PPR systems
  • Use stress testing for performance-critical components

DON'T ❌

  • Create tests without proper validation of results
  • Skip testing error cases and edge conditions
  • Use hardcoded test data that's hard to maintain
  • Create tests that depend on each other's state
  • Ignore performance testing for critical paths
  • Skip multi-agent testing for collaborative features
  • Test without proper timeout handling
  • Create tests that don't validate Holochain-specific patterns
  • Skip cryptographic validation testing
  • Ignore DHT consistency requirements in multi-agent tests

Resources

Test Utilities/

Shared testing helpers and utilities:

  • common.ts - Common test patterns and helpers
  • agents.ts - Agent management and setup utilities
  • fixtures.ts - Test data generators and fixtures

Test Scenarios/

Predefined test scenarios for common workflows:

  • ppr-scenarios.ts - PPR system test scenarios
  • multi-agent.ts - Multi-agent interaction patterns
  • performance.ts - Performance testing utilities

Note: This skill is specifically tailored for the nondominium project's Tryorama testing needs and should be used in conjunction with the DNA development skill for comprehensive Holochain application testing.

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results