┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  ⛔ ORCHESTRATOR MUST NEVER READ PDF FILES DIRECTLY ⛔             │
│                                                                    │
│  The orchestrator (you, running this skill) may ONLY read:         │
│  - scope.md                                                        │
│  - inventory.md                                                    │
│  - notes/ethics-summary.md                                            │
│  - notes/papers/*.md (the condensed notes, NOT PDFs)               │
│  - notes/bibliography.md                                           │
│  - notes/literature-synthesis.md                                   │
│                                                                    │
│  If you find yourself about to use the Read tool on a .pdf file,   │
│  STOP. Spawn a subagent instead.                                   │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  ⛔ EACH SUBAGENT PROCESSES EXACTLY ONE PAPER ⛔                   │
│                                                                    │
│  - One Task tool call = One PDF                                    │
│  - Never pass multiple PDFs to a single subagent                   │
│  - Never ask a subagent to "process the remaining papers"          │
│  - Wait for each subagent to complete before spawning the next     │
│                                                                    │
│  WRONG: Task("Process papers/a.pdf, papers/b.pdf, papers/c.pdf")   │
│  RIGHT: Task("Process papers/a.pdf") → wait → Task("Process b.pdf")│
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    LITERATURE REVIEW WORKFLOW                    │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                 │
│  [ORCHESTRATOR]                                                 │
│       │                                                         │
│       ├──► Read scope.md (extract research context)             │
│       │                                                         │
│       ├──► List papers/*.pdf                                    │
│       │                                                         │
│       ├──► For each PDF, spawn isolated subagent:               │
│       │         │                                               │
│       │         ├──► [Subagent] Read ONE PDF                    │
│       │         ├──► [Subagent] Generate notes/papers/*.md      │
│       │         └──► [Subagent] Exit (context cleared)          │
│       │                                                         │
│       ├──► Read all notes/papers/*.md (small files)             │
│       │                                                         │
│       ├──► Generate bibliography + synthesis                    │
│       │                                                         │
│       └──► Draft Introduction                                   │
│                                                                 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

[Step 1: Read scope.md for context]
     │
     ▼
[Step 2: Inventory papers/ folder]
     │
     ▼
[Step 3: Process each PDF via subagent] ─── One at a time
     │                                       └── notes/papers/*.md
     ▼
[Step 4: Generate bibliography] ─── From all notes
     │                              └── notes/bibliography.md
     ▼
[Step 5: Synthesize literature] ─── Aggregate findings
     │                              └── notes/literature-synthesis.md
     ▼
[Step 6: Draft Introduction]
     │
     ▼
[Output] ─── drafts/introduction.md

## Manuscript Context

You are helping write a scientific research manuscript. Your job is to read ONE paper and extract information most relevant to this manuscript.

### Our Research Question
[Full research question from scope.md]

### Our Hypothesis
[What we expect to find / are arguing]

### Our Key Findings
[Summary of main results - what we found]

### Our Methods
[Brief description of study design, population, techniques used]

### Target Journal
[Journal name] - [word limit] words - [citation style]

### What to Look For in This Paper

As you read, focus on extracting:
1. **Background claims** we can cite to establish the problem's importance
2. **Methodological precedents** that justify our approach
3. **Comparable results** we can compare our findings against
4. **Contradictory findings** we need to address in Discussion
5. **Gaps identified** that our study fills
6. **Quotable statements** that frame the field well

ls papers/*.pdf

## Papers to Process

| # | Filename | Status |
|---|----------|--------|
| 1 | smith-2023.pdf | Pending |
| 2 | jones-2022.pdf | Pending |
| 3 | wilson-2021.pdf | Pending |
...

mkdir -p notes/papers-library
cp papers/*.pdf notes/papers-library/

Task(
  subagent_type: "general-purpose",
  prompt: """
  ⛔ YOU ARE PROCESSING EXACTLY ONE PAPER. DO NOT READ ANY OTHER PDFs. ⛔

  ## Your Role

  You are a research assistant helping write a scientific manuscript. Your job is to:
  1. Read ONE paper
  2. Extract information most relevant to our manuscript
  3. Write condensed notes highlighting what's useful for our paper
  4. Exit immediately after

  ## Your ONE Paper

  **PDF to read**: papers/{filename}.pdf
  **Output file**: notes/papers/{filename}.md

  ## Manuscript Context (What We're Writing)

  {scope_summary}

  ## Instructions

  1. Read ONLY the PDF file specified above
  2. Extract citation metadata (authors, title, journal, DOI, PMID)
  3. Summarize the paper's main contribution
  4. **Focus on relevance**: What from this paper helps our manuscript?
     - Background claims we can cite?
     - Methods similar to ours?
     - Results we can compare against?
     - Contradictions we need to address?
     - Quotes that frame the problem well?
  5. **Recommend inclusion**: Should this paper be cited in our manuscript?
  6. Write condensed notes to the output file
  7. Return a summary with your recommendation
  8. EXIT - Do not process any other papers

  ## Note Template

  # [First Author] et al., [Year]

  **Processed**: [timestamp]

  ## Citation
  - **Authors**: [full author list]
  - **Title**: [title]
  - **Journal**: [journal]
  - **Year**: [year]
  - **DOI**: [doi or "not found"]
  - **PMID**: [pmid or "not found"]

  ## Paper Summary
  [2-3 sentences on what this paper is about]

  ## Study Design
  - **Type**: [RCT, cohort, retrospective, etc.]
  - **Population**: [N, key characteristics]
  - **Methods**: [key techniques used]

  ## Key Findings
  | Finding | Statistic | Interpretation |
  |---------|-----------|----------------|
  | [finding] | [p-value, CI, effect size] | [what it means] |

  ## Relevance to Our Manuscript

  **Relationship**: [Supports / Contradicts / Provides Context / Methodological Reference]

  ### For Introduction
  - [Claims or context we can cite to frame our problem]
  - [Gaps this paper identifies that we address]

  ### For Methods
  - [Methodological precedents that justify our approach]

  ### For Discussion
  - [Results to compare against ours]
  - [Contradictions we need to explain]

  ## Key Quotes
  > "[Quotable statement that frames the field or problem well]" (p. X)

  > "[Another useful quote if available]" (p. X)

  ## Recommendation

  **Include in draft?**: [Yes / No]
  **Rationale**: [1-2 sentences - Is this paper directly relevant? Would citing it feel natural or forced?]

  ## Tags
  #[topic1] #[topic2] #[methodology]
  """
)

| # | Filename | Status | Recommendation |
|---|----------|--------|----------------|
| 1 | smith-2023.pdf | ✓ Complete | Include |
| 2 | jones-2022.pdf | ✓ Complete | Include |
| 3 | wilson-2021.pdf | ✓ Complete | Exclude - different population |
| 4 | brown-2020.pdf | Processing... | - |

# Master Bibliography

**Generated**: [timestamp]
**Total References**: [n]

## References

| # | Citation | DOI | PMID |
|---|----------|-----|------|
| 1 | Smith JA, et al. Title. Journal. 2023;1:1-10. | 10.xxx | 123456 |
| 2 | Jones BB, et al. Title. Journal. 2022;2:20-30. | 10.xxx | 234567 |

## Papers Needing Attention

| Paper | Issue |
|-------|-------|
| [filename] | [missing DOI / couldn't process / etc.] |

# Literature Synthesis

**Generated**: [timestamp]
**Research Question**: [from scope.md]
**Papers Reviewed**: [n]

---

## Paper Citation Tracker

Use the subagent recommendations from Step 3 to populate this table. Papers recommended for exclusion by the subagent should be marked "Not Applicable."

| # | Citation | Note File | Subagent Rec | Natural Fit | Status |
|---|----------|-----------|--------------|-------------|--------|
| 1 | Smith et al., 2023 | notes/papers/smith-2023.md | Include | Intro: establishes prevalence | Planned |
| 2 | Jones et al., 2022 | notes/papers/jones-2022.md | Include | Discussion: comparable methods | Planned |
| 3 | Wilson et al., 2021 | notes/papers/wilson-2021.md | Exclude | Different population | Not Applicable |

**Status Legend**:
- **Planned**: Subagent recommended inclusion and paper has a natural place
- **Not Applicable**: Subagent recommended exclusion or paper doesn't fit naturally

**Guidance**: Trust the subagent's assessment of relevance. The goal is a coherent manuscript, not maximum citations.

---

## Source Inventory

| # | Citation | Type | Relationship |
|---|----------|------|--------------|
| 1 | Smith et al., 2023 | Original Research | Supports |
| 2 | Jones et al., 2022 | Review | Context |

---

## Key Themes

### Theme 1: [Theme Name]

**Summary**: [2-3 sentences]

**Sources**: Smith 2023, Jones 2022

**Relevance**: [connection to our study]

### Theme 2: [Theme Name]

[repeat pattern]

---

## Supporting Findings

| Finding | Source | How It Supports Our Work |
|---------|--------|--------------------------|
| [finding] | Smith 2023 | [explanation] |

---

## Contradictory Findings

| Finding | Source | Possible Explanation |
|---------|--------|---------------------|
| [finding] | Jones 2022 | [why it differs] |

---

## Gaps in Literature

| Gap | Evidence | How We Address It |
|-----|----------|-------------------|
| [gap] | No studies on X | We examine X |

---

## Implications for Manuscript

### Introduction
- **Paragraph 1 (Problem)**: Cite [sources]
- **Paragraph 2 (Knowledge)**: Cite [sources]
- **Paragraph 3 (Gap)**: Cite [sources]
- **Paragraph 4 (This Study)**: Reference scope.md

### Discussion
- **Comparisons**: [sources for comparing results]
- **Interpretation**: [sources for mechanisms]

# Introduction

[Paragraph 1 - Problem and significance]

[Paragraph 2 - Current knowledge]

[Paragraph 3 - Gap and limitations]

[Paragraph 4 - This study's purpose]

---

## References Used

1. [Citation] - notes/papers/smith-2023.md
2. [Citation] - notes/papers/jones-2022.md
...