linear-crit-path-to-task

Objective

Decompose Linear issue FOU-$ARGUMENTS into a set of granular, dependency-ordered sub-issues that form a critical path from the current state of the codebase to the completed feature.

Process

1. Gather Context

• Fetch the full details of FOU-$ARGUMENTS from Linear (include relations)
• Analyse the codebase to understand the current state relevant to this issue
• List all active Linear projects to understand where issues should be placed

2. Decompose

Break the issue into the smallest meaningful units of work. Each issue should be:

• Independently deliverable — can be completed, reviewed, and merged on its own
• Single responsibility — one clear outcome per issue
• Well-scoped — achievable in a focused session (hours, not days)

3. Classify Relationships

Apply consistent reasoning to distinguish between two relationship types:

Child issues (use parentId) when the work is:

• A direct sub-task that exists solely to accomplish part of the parent
• Meaningless without the parent issue's context
• Something that would naturally nest under the parent in a work breakdown

Blocking issues (use blocks/blockedBy) when the work is:

• A prerequisite that has independent value beyond the parent issue
• Infrastructure, refactoring, or setup that other work also depends on
• Something that must be completed first but isn't conceptually "part of" the parent

An issue can be both a child AND have blocking relationships with siblings.

4. Determine Project Placement

For each issue, select the most appropriate existing Linear project based on:

• The issue's domain (frontend, backend, infrastructure, etc.)
• Which project's scope best encompasses the work
• If no project fits well, omit the project field rather than forcing a bad fit

5. Build the Critical Path

Order the issues by dependency. The critical path should flow logically:

1. Foundation/infrastructure work first
2. Core implementation in the middle
3. Integration, polish, and verification last

6. Present the Plan

Before creating anything, present a summary table showing:

• Issue title
• Relationship type (child / blocker)
• Dependencies (what it blocks / is blocked by)
• Target project
• Priority (2=High, 3=Normal, 4=Low)

Wait for approval before creating issues.

7. Create Issues

Once approved, create all issues in dependency order (foundations first). For each issue:

• Assign to me
• Set the appropriate parentId for child issues
• Set blocks/blockedBy using the identifiers of previously created issues
• Set project if determined in step 4
• Set priority based on critical path position
• Write a clear description in markdown including:
  • What needs to be done
  • Acceptance criteria
  • Any relevant context about the current codebase state

8. Confirm

After all issues are created, provide a summary of what was created with their identifiers and a visual representation of the dependency graph.