Agent skill

latex-scaffold

Scaffold a LaTeX project (`latex/main.tex`, bibliography wiring, structure) from an existing Markdown draft and `citations/ref.bib`. **Trigger**: latex scaffold, md→tex, LaTeX 项目骨架, 生成 main.tex. **Use when**: 需要 LaTeX/PDF 交付(例如 arxiv-survey-latex pipeline),且 draft 已生成/已进入写作阶段。 **Skip if**: 还没有 `output/DRAFT.md`(或你不需要 LaTeX 交付)。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 移除 markdown 残留(`##`, `**`, `[@...]`);bibliography 指向 `citations/ref.bib`;不在此步骤改写内容。

Stars 377
Forks 25

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills/tree/main/.codex/skills/latex-scaffold

SKILL.md

LaTeX Scaffold

Convert the approved Markdown draft into a minimal, buildable LaTeX project.

This is a deterministic conversion step; prose quality should already be addressed in output/DRAFT.md.

Inputs

  • output/DRAFT.md (or another approved draft)
  • citations/ref.bib

Outputs

  • latex/main.tex (and any required LaTeX support files)

Workflow

  1. Create latex/ directory if missing.
  2. Create latex/main.tex with sections matching the outline.
  3. Wire bibliography to citations/ref.bib.

Quality checklist

  • latex/main.tex exists and references citations/ref.bib.

Script

Quick Start

  • python .codex/skills/latex-scaffold/scripts/run.py --help
  • python .codex/skills/latex-scaffold/scripts/run.py --workspace <workspace_dir>

All Options

  • See --help (inputs/outputs are taken from the unit runner when used via pipeline)

Examples

  • Build latex/main.tex from output/DRAFT.md:
    • python .codex/skills/latex-scaffold/scripts/run.py --workspace <ws>

Notes

  • The generated latex/main.tex includes a table of contents (tocdepth=2) for readability.
  • Language default: the scaffold uses article (English-looking front matter). If the draft contains CJK characters, it switches to ctexart so the PDF renders correctly.
  • Conversion rules (high level):
    • Headings ##/###/####\section/\subsection/\subsubsection (strips leading numeric prefixes like 1.2).
    • Headings starting with Appendix / 附录 trigger \appendix once, then render as appendix sections.
    • Bold caption lines like **Table 1. ...** / **Appendix Table A1. ...** immediately before a Markdown table become a LaTeX table float with \caption{...} and a stable \label{tab:...}.
    • ## Abstractabstract environment.
    • [@Key] or [@Key1; @Key2]\citep{Key} / \citep{Key1,Key2}.
    • Inline markdown **bold** / *italic* / `code`\textbf{} / \emph{} / \texttt{}.

Troubleshooting

Issue: the generated latex/main.tex still contains Markdown markers

Fix:

  • Re-run latex-scaffold and ensure the input output/DRAFT.md is clean (no ##, no **, no [@...] syntax that isn""t handled).

Issue: citations are missing in LaTeX

Fix:

  • Ensure citations/ref.bib exists and the scaffold points bibliography to it; then compile with latex-compile-qa.

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

thesis-compile-review

对中文毕业论文进行编译、warning 分级、模板模式检查、数据与引用复查,并把问题回写成可继续迭代的 review checklist。 **Trigger**: 毕业论文编译检查, thesis compile review, warning 分级, 终稿复查, main.pdf 检查. **Use when**: 论文已经回写到 TeX 交付层,需要确认是否真正达到“可提交”的质量,而不是只做到能编译。 **Skip if**: 还处于中间层重构阶段,`chapters/*.tex` 尚未形成稳定交付稿。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里重构章节主线;如果发现结构问题,明确回退到上游修复。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

front-matter-writer

Write the survey's front matter files (Abstract, Introduction, Related Work, Discussion, Conclusion) in paper voice, with high citation density and a single evidence-policy paragraph. **Trigger**: front matter writer, introduction writer, related work writer, abstract writer, discussion writer, conclusion writer, 引言, 相关工作, 摘要, 讨论, 结论. **Use when**: you are in C5 (prose allowed) and need the paper-like shell to stop the draft reading like stitched subsections. **Skip if**: `Approve C2` is missing in `DECISIONS.md`, or `citations/ref.bib` is missing. **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: no invented facts/citations; no pipeline jargon in final prose; no repeated evidence disclaimers; only use keys present in `citations/ref.bib`.

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

thesis-question-list

维护中文毕业论文的 `codex_md/question_list.md`:把本轮问题、边界、优先级、协作方案和验收口径结构化,作为整条 thesis pipeline 的控制面。 **Trigger**: 毕业论文问题清单, thesis question list, 论文修改清单, 本轮目标, 结构问题梳理, review问题整理. **Use when**: 你已经有一批材料或上一轮 review 结果,需要明确这一轮到底修什么、不修什么,并给后续重构与编译复查提供统一入口。 **Skip if**: 当前只是在做一次性局部措辞修改,且没有形成新一轮结构/证据/编译问题。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里写正文;不把问题单写成长篇散文;每条问题必须可执行、可验收。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

novelty-matrix

Create a novelty/prior-work matrix comparing the submission’s contributions against related work (overlaps vs deltas). **Trigger**: novelty matrix, prior-work matrix, overlap/delta, 相关工作对比, 新颖性矩阵. **Use when**: peer review 中评估 novelty/positioning,需要把贡献与相关工作逐项对齐并写出差异点证据。 **Skip if**: 缺少 claims(先跑 `claims-extractor`)或你不打算做新颖性定位分析。 **Network**: none (retrieval of additional related work is out-of-scope unless provided). **Guardrail**: 明确 overlap 与 delta;尽量给出可追溯证据来源(来自稿件/引用/作者陈述)。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

protocol-writer

Write a systematic review protocol into `output/PROTOCOL.md` (databases, queries, inclusion/exclusion, time window, extraction fields). **Trigger**: protocol, PRISMA, systematic review, inclusion/exclusion, 检索式, 纳入排除. **Use when**: systematic review pipeline 的起点(C1),需要先锁定 protocol 再开始 screening/extraction。 **Skip if**: 不是做 systematic review(或 protocol 已经锁定且不允许修改)。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: protocol 必须包含可执行的检索与筛选规则;需要 HUMAN 签字后才能进入 screening。

377 25
Explore
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

rubric-writer

Write a rubric-based peer review report (`output/REVIEW.md`) using extracted claims and evidence gaps (novelty/soundness/clarity/impact). **Trigger**: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md. **Use when**: peer-review pipeline 的最后阶段(C3),已有 `output/CLAIMS.md` + `output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md`(以及可选 novelty matrix)。 **Skip if**: 上游产物未就绪(claims/evidence gaps 缺失)或你不打算输出完整审稿报告。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 给可执行建议(actionable feedback),并覆盖 novelty/soundness/clarity/impact;避免泛泛而谈。

377 25
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results