Agent skill
knowledge-review
[Research] Review knowledge artifacts for completeness, citation quality, confidence accuracy, and template compliance.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatform/tree/main/.claude/skills/knowledge-review
SKILL.md
[IMPORTANT] Use
TaskCreateto break ALL work into small tasks BEFORE starting.
Prerequisites: MUST READ before executing:
Web Research Protocol — Structured web research: define search queries, validate source credibility, cross-reference claims across 3+ sources, track evidence provenance. MUST READ
.claude/skills/shared/web-research-protocol.mdfor full protocol and checklists.
OOP & DRY Enforcement: MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST — flag duplicated patterns that should be extracted to a base class, generic, or helper. Classes in the same group or suffix (ex *Entity, *Dto, *Service, etc...) MUST inherit a common base (even if empty now — enables future shared logic and child overrides). Verify project has code linting/analyzer configured for the stack.
Quick Summary
Goal: Review knowledge artifacts for quality, completeness, and protocol compliance.
Workflow:
- Read artifact — Load the knowledge report/course/strategy
- Template compliance — Verify all enforced sections present
- Citation audit — Check inline citations and source table
- Confidence check — Verify scores match evidence
- Output review — Summary with pass/warn/fail per check
Key Rules:
- Every section from template must be present and non-empty
- Every factual claim must have inline citation
- Confidence scores must match evidence basis
- READ-ONLY — do not modify the artifact
Be skeptical. Apply critical thinking, sequential thinking. Every claim needs traced proof, confidence percentages (Idea should be more than 80%).
Knowledge Review
Review Checklist
1. Template Compliance
- All enforced sections present
- No sections are empty placeholders
- Section order matches template
2. Citation Audit
- Every factual claim has inline citation
[N] - Every source in Sources table is referenced in text
- No orphan citations
- Sources table has: Title, URL, Author, Date, Tier
3. Confidence Accuracy
- Per-finding confidence scores declared
- Overall confidence declared
- Scores match evidence basis (not inflated)
- Findings <60% flagged prominently
4. Source Quality
- Tier distribution appropriate (not all Tier 4)
- At least 50% Tier 1-2 sources for key claims
- Recency appropriate for topic type
5. Knowledge Gaps
- Gaps section is present and honest
- Known limitations declared
- Suggestions for further research included
6. Cross-Validation
- Key claims verified by 2+ sources
- Discrepancies noted where sources conflict
- Single-source claims marked as unverified
7. Actionability
- Recommendations are concrete (not vague)
- Next steps are evidence-based
- Executive summary captures key findings
Output Format
## Knowledge Review Result
**Status:** PASS | WARN | FAIL
**Artifact:** {path}
### Checks (N/7 passed)
- [x] Template compliance
- [x] Citation audit
- [ ] Confidence accuracy — {issue}
- [ ] Source quality — {issue}
...
### Issues
- {specific issues found}
### Verdict
{APPROVED | REVISE | BLOCKED}
Round 2: Focused Re-Review (MANDATORY)
Protocol:
.claude/skills/shared/double-round-trip-review-protocol.md
After completing Round 1 evaluation, execute a second full review round:
- Re-read the Round 1 verdict and checklist results
- Re-evaluate ALL checklist items — do NOT rely on Round 1 memory
- Challenge Round 1 PASS items: "Is this really PASS? Did I verify citations and confidence?"
- Focus on what Round 1 typically misses:
- Citation accuracy (do sources actually say what's claimed?)
- Confidence calibration (are percentages realistic?)
- Knowledge gaps that weren't flagged
- Template compliance shortcuts
- Update verdict if Round 2 found new issues
- Final verdict must incorporate findings from BOTH rounds
Closing Reminders
- MUST break work into small todo tasks using
TaskCreateBEFORE starting - MUST search codebase for 3+ similar patterns before creating new code
- MUST cite
file:lineevidence for every claim (confidence >80% to act) - MUST add a final review todo task to verify work quality
- MUST execute two review rounds (Round 1: understand, Round 2: catch missed issues) MANDATORY IMPORTANT MUST READ the following files before starting:
- MUST READ
.claude/skills/shared/web-research-protocol.mdbefore starting
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
fix-parallel
[Implementation] Analyze & fix issues with parallel fullstack-developer agents
ask
[Utilities] Answer technical and architectural questions.
claude-code
[Utilities] Claude Code CLI setup, configuration, troubleshooting, and feature guidance. Triggers on claude code setup, hook not firing, MCP connection, context limit, skill creation, slash command setup.
workflow-deployment
[Workflow] Trigger Deployment & Infrastructure workflow — CI/CD pipelines, Docker, Kubernetes setup and deployment.
workflow-idea-to-pbi
[Workflow] Trigger Idea to PBI workflow — po/ba workflow: capture idea, refine to pbi, create stories, prioritize.
easy-claude-help
[Utilities] Configuration guide for the easy-claude framework — explain settings, guide users through configuring .ck.json.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?