Agent skill

iterative-retrieval

Pattern for progressively refining context retrieval to solve the subagent context problem

View SKILL.md on GitHub Repository
Stars 132,726
Forks 19,206

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code/tree/main/skills/iterative-retrieval

SKILL.md

Iterative Retrieval Pattern

Solves the "context problem" in multi-agent workflows where subagents don't know what context they need until they start working.

When to Activate

  • Spawning subagents that need codebase context they cannot predict upfront
  • Building multi-agent workflows where context is progressively refined
  • Encountering "context too large" or "missing context" failures in agent tasks
  • Designing RAG-like retrieval pipelines for code exploration
  • Optimizing token usage in agent orchestration

The Problem

Subagents are spawned with limited context. They don't know:

  • Which files contain relevant code
  • What patterns exist in the codebase
  • What terminology the project uses

Standard approaches fail:

  • Send everything: Exceeds context limits
  • Send nothing: Agent lacks critical information
  • Guess what's needed: Often wrong

The Solution: Iterative Retrieval

A 4-phase loop that progressively refines context:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                                             │
│   ┌──────────┐      ┌──────────┐            │
│   │ DISPATCH │─────│ EVALUATE │            │
│   └──────────┘      └──────────┘            │
│        ▲                  │                 │
│        │                  ▼                 │
│   ┌──────────┐      ┌──────────┐            │
│   │   LOOP   │─────│  REFINE  │            │
│   └──────────┘      └──────────┘            │
│                                             │
│        Max 3 cycles, then proceed           │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Phase 1: DISPATCH

Initial broad query to gather candidate files:

javascript
// Start with high-level intent
const initialQuery = {
  patterns: ['src/**/*.ts', 'lib/**/*.ts'],
  keywords: ['authentication', 'user', 'session'],
  excludes: ['*.test.ts', '*.spec.ts']
};

// Dispatch to retrieval agent
const candidates = await retrieveFiles(initialQuery);

Phase 2: EVALUATE

Assess retrieved content for relevance:

javascript
function evaluateRelevance(files, task) {
  return files.map(file => ({
    path: file.path,
    relevance: scoreRelevance(file.content, task),
    reason: explainRelevance(file.content, task),
    missingContext: identifyGaps(file.content, task)
  }));
}

Scoring criteria:

  • High (0.8-1.0): Directly implements target functionality
  • Medium (0.5-0.7): Contains related patterns or types
  • Low (0.2-0.4): Tangentially related
  • None (0-0.2): Not relevant, exclude

Phase 3: REFINE

Update search criteria based on evaluation:

javascript
function refineQuery(evaluation, previousQuery) {
  return {
    // Add new patterns discovered in high-relevance files
    patterns: [...previousQuery.patterns, ...extractPatterns(evaluation)],

    // Add terminology found in codebase
    keywords: [...previousQuery.keywords, ...extractKeywords(evaluation)],

    // Exclude confirmed irrelevant paths
    excludes: [...previousQuery.excludes, ...evaluation
      .filter(e => e.relevance < 0.2)
      .map(e => e.path)
    ],

    // Target specific gaps
    focusAreas: evaluation
      .flatMap(e => e.missingContext)
      .filter(unique)
  };
}

Phase 4: LOOP

Repeat with refined criteria (max 3 cycles):

javascript
async function iterativeRetrieve(task, maxCycles = 3) {
  let query = createInitialQuery(task);
  let bestContext = [];

  for (let cycle = 0; cycle < maxCycles; cycle++) {
    const candidates = await retrieveFiles(query);
    const evaluation = evaluateRelevance(candidates, task);

    // Check if we have sufficient context
    const highRelevance = evaluation.filter(e => e.relevance >= 0.7);
    if (highRelevance.length >= 3 && !hasCriticalGaps(evaluation)) {
      return highRelevance;
    }

    // Refine and continue
    query = refineQuery(evaluation, query);
    bestContext = mergeContext(bestContext, highRelevance);
  }

  return bestContext;
}

Practical Examples

Example 1: Bug Fix Context

Task: "Fix the authentication token expiry bug"

Cycle 1:
  DISPATCH: Search for "token", "auth", "expiry" in src/**
  EVALUATE: Found auth.ts (0.9), tokens.ts (0.8), user.ts (0.3)
  REFINE: Add "refresh", "jwt" keywords; exclude user.ts

Cycle 2:
  DISPATCH: Search refined terms
  EVALUATE: Found session-manager.ts (0.95), jwt-utils.ts (0.85)
  REFINE: Sufficient context (2 high-relevance files)

Result: auth.ts, tokens.ts, session-manager.ts, jwt-utils.ts

Example 2: Feature Implementation

Task: "Add rate limiting to API endpoints"

Cycle 1:
  DISPATCH: Search "rate", "limit", "api" in routes/**
  EVALUATE: No matches - codebase uses "throttle" terminology
  REFINE: Add "throttle", "middleware" keywords

Cycle 2:
  DISPATCH: Search refined terms
  EVALUATE: Found throttle.ts (0.9), middleware/index.ts (0.7)
  REFINE: Need router patterns

Cycle 3:
  DISPATCH: Search "router", "express" patterns
  EVALUATE: Found router-setup.ts (0.8)
  REFINE: Sufficient context

Result: throttle.ts, middleware/index.ts, router-setup.ts

Integration with Agents

Use in agent prompts:

markdown
When retrieving context for this task:
1. Start with broad keyword search
2. Evaluate each file's relevance (0-1 scale)
3. Identify what context is still missing
4. Refine search criteria and repeat (max 3 cycles)
5. Return files with relevance >= 0.7

Best Practices

  1. Start broad, narrow progressively - Don't over-specify initial queries
  2. Learn codebase terminology - First cycle often reveals naming conventions
  3. Track what's missing - Explicit gap identification drives refinement
  4. Stop at "good enough" - 3 high-relevance files beats 10 mediocre ones
  5. Exclude confidently - Low-relevance files won't become relevant

Related

  • The Longform Guide - Subagent orchestration section
  • continuous-learning skill - For patterns that improve over time
  • Agent definitions bundled with ECC (manual install path: agents/)

Recommended Agent Skills

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

affaan-m/everything-claude-code

python-testing

Python testing best practices using pytest including fixtures, parametrization, mocking, coverage analysis, async testing, and test organization. Use when writing or improving Python tests.

132,726 19,206
Explore
affaan-m/everything-claude-code

golang-patterns

Go-specific design patterns and best practices including functional options, small interfaces, dependency injection, concurrency patterns, error handling, and package organization. Use when working with Go code to apply idiomatic Go patterns.

132,726 19,206
Explore
affaan-m/everything-claude-code

e2e-testing

Playwright E2E testing patterns, Page Object Model, configuration, CI/CD integration, artifact management, and flaky test strategies.

132,726 19,206
Explore
affaan-m/everything-claude-code

agentic-engineering

Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing. Use when AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.

132,726 19,206
Explore
affaan-m/everything-claude-code

api-design

REST API design patterns including resource naming, status codes, pagination, filtering, error responses, versioning, and rate limiting for production APIs.

132,726 19,206
Explore
affaan-m/everything-claude-code

python-patterns

Python-specific design patterns and best practices including protocols, dataclasses, context managers, decorators, async/await, type hints, and package organization. Use when working with Python code to apply Pythonic patterns.

132,726 19,206
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results