Agent skill

incident-management-defconxt-cipher

Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/other/other/incident-management-defconxt-cipher

SKILL.md


name: incident-management description: >- End-to-end incident management lifecycle including classification frameworks, escalation procedures, root cause analysis, metrics tracking (MTTD/MTTR/MTTC), crisis communication, timeline reconstruction, lessons learned, severity matrices, stakeholder notification, documentation standards, war room coordination, and incident trend analysis aligned with NIST SP 800-61 and ISO 27035. domain: cybersecurity subdomain: incident-management tags:

  • incident-response
  • incident-management
  • classification
  • escalation
  • root-cause-analysis
  • crisis-communication
  • severity-matrix
  • war-room
  • lessons-learned
  • metrics
  • nist-800-61
  • iso-27035 version: "1.0" author: defconxt license: AGPL-3.0 compatibility: Designed for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, OpenAI Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, and any agentskills.io-compatible agent. metadata: mitre-attack: ["TA0001", "TA0002", "TA0003", "TA0005", "TA0010", "TA0040"] nist-csf: ["RS.RP-1", "RS.CO-1", "RS.AN-1", "RS.MI-1", "RS.IM-1", "RC.RP-1"] frameworks: ["NIST SP 800-61", "ISO 27035", "SANS PICERL", "ITIL Incident Management"]

Incident Management

When to Use

Activate when the operator asks about incident classification, escalation workflows, root cause analysis, crisis communication, severity assessment, war room procedures, stakeholder notification, incident documentation, metrics tracking, lessons learned, or incident trend analysis.

Mode: [MODE: INCIDENT] primary; [MODE: BLUE] for detection-to-incident handoff; [MODE: ARCHITECT] for process design.

Quick Reference

Task Framework / Tool Context
Classify incident NIST 800-61 Category + Functional Impact Triage
Assign severity Severity matrix (S1–S4) Triage
Escalation path Tiered escalation with SLA timers Response
Root cause analysis 5 Whys, Ishikawa, Fault Tree Post-incident
Timeline reconstruction Log correlation + visual timeline Investigation
Crisis communication Templated stakeholder notifications Communication
War room coordination Structured roles + cadence Active incident
Lessons learned Blameless retrospective framework Post-incident
Metrics tracking MTTD, MTTR, MTTC, recurrence rate Continuous
Trend analysis Category/severity trends over time Strategic

Workflow

1. Incident Lifecycle (NIST SP 800-61)

PREPARATION
├── Classification framework defined (category + severity)
├── Escalation procedures documented and tested
├── Communication templates ready
├── War room procedures established
└── Roles and responsibilities assigned

DETECTION & ANALYSIS
├── Alert triage → incident declaration
├── Severity assignment via matrix
├── Timeline reconstruction begins
├── Stakeholder notification per severity
└── Documentation starts immediately

CONTAINMENT, ERADICATION & RECOVERY
├── War room activated (S1/S2)
├── Containment strategy selected (short-term / long-term)
├── Eradication of threat actor presence
├── Recovery and service restoration
└── Continuous documentation and status updates

POST-INCIDENT ACTIVITY
├── Root cause analysis (5 Whys, Ishikawa)
├── Lessons learned / blameless retrospective
├── Metrics capture (MTTD, MTTR, MTTC)
├── Detection gap remediation
├── Trend analysis update
└── Process improvements implemented

2. Severity Matrix

Severity Impact Examples Response SLA
S1 — Critical Business-threatening, data breach, total service loss Ransomware, active data exfil, prod down 15 min response, 1 hr containment
S2 — High Significant impact, partial service loss Compromised admin account, partial outage 30 min response, 4 hr containment
S3 — Medium Limited impact, no data loss Malware on single host, phishing success 2 hr response, 24 hr resolution
S4 — Low Minimal impact, policy violation Failed brute force, policy exception 8 hr response, 72 hr resolution

3. Escalation Tiers

TIER 1 — SOC Analyst (0-15 min)
├── Initial triage and classification
├── Severity assignment
├── Stakeholder notification (S1/S2 immediate)
└── Escalate if: confirmed malicious, scope unclear, S1/S2

TIER 2 — Incident Lead (15-60 min)
├── Assume incident command
├── Activate war room (S1/S2)
├── Coordinate containment
└── Escalate if: business impact, legal/regulatory trigger

TIER 3 — CISO / Executive (as needed)
├── Business decisions (pay/don't pay, disclose/don't)
├── Regulatory notification authorization
├── External communication approval
└── Resource allocation

4. Metrics Framework

Operational Metrics:
├── MTTD: Mean Time to Detect — alert to declaration
├── MTTR: Mean Time to Respond — declaration to containment
├── MTTC: Mean Time to Close — declaration to resolution
├── MTTRE: Mean Time to Remediate — RCA finding to fix deployed
├── Recurrence Rate: incidents reopened / total incidents
└── Escalation Accuracy: correct severity at declaration

Process Metrics:
├── Documentation Completeness: required fields filled %
├── Lessons Learned Completion: retros held within SLA %
├── Action Item Closure Rate: retro actions completed on time %
└── Communication SLA: stakeholder updates sent within SLA %

Trend Metrics:
├── Incidents by category (monthly)
├── Incidents by severity (monthly)
├── Top 5 root causes (quarterly)
├── Repeat incident rate (quarterly)
└── Detection coverage improvement (quarterly)

5. Communication Templates

INITIAL NOTIFICATION (S1/S2):
Subject: [INCIDENT-{ID}] {Severity} — {Short Description}
Body:
  Status: ACTIVE
  Severity: {S1|S2|S3|S4}
  Impact: {description of business impact}
  Current Actions: {what is being done now}
  Next Update: {time of next scheduled update}
  Incident Commander: {name}
  War Room: {link/location}

STATUS UPDATE:
Subject: [INCIDENT-{ID}] UPDATE #{n} — {Status}
Body:
  Status: {ACTIVE|CONTAINED|ERADICATED|RESOLVED}
  Changes Since Last Update: {what changed}
  Current Actions: {what is being done now}
  Next Update: {time}

RESOLUTION NOTIFICATION:
Subject: [INCIDENT-{ID}] RESOLVED — {Short Description}
Body:
  Status: RESOLVED
  Duration: {total time from declaration to resolution}
  Root Cause: {brief summary}
  Impact Summary: {systems/users affected}
  Lessons Learned Review: {scheduled date}

Techniques

Technique Description
implementing-incident-classification-framework Define category taxonomy and functional impact ratings
building-incident-escalation-procedures Tiered escalation with SLA timers and decision trees
performing-root-cause-analysis 5 Whys, Ishikawa, and Fault Tree methods
implementing-incident-metrics-tracking MTTD/MTTR/MTTC dashboards and KPIs
building-crisis-communication-plans Stakeholder templates and communication cadence
performing-incident-timeline-reconstruction Multi-source log correlation and visual timelines
implementing-lessons-learned-processes Blameless retrospective framework and action tracking
building-incident-severity-matrices Multi-factor severity scoring and SLA mapping
performing-stakeholder-notification Automated notification routing and regulatory compliance
implementing-incident-documentation-standards Structured templates and completeness validation
building-war-room-procedures Role assignments, cadence, and coordination protocols
performing-incident-trend-analysis Statistical trend detection and forecasting

Verification

  • Classification framework covers all NIST 800-61 categories
  • Severity matrix validated with business stakeholders
  • Escalation procedures tested via tabletop exercise
  • Communication templates approved by legal and PR
  • Metrics dashboard operational (MTTD, MTTR, MTTC)
  • Lessons learned process running for all S1/S2 incidents
  • War room procedures exercised quarterly
  • Incident documentation completeness > 90%
  • Trend analysis reviewed monthly by leadership

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results