ReddRadar
Agent skill
idea-memo-writer
Synthesize the shortlist into a discussion-ready research idea brainstorm memo, writing `output/REPORT.md`, `output/APPENDIX.md`, and `output/REPORT.json`. **Trigger**: idea memo, brainstorm memo, research direction memo, report md, 研究备忘录, brainstorm report. **Use when**: the shortlist exists and you want the final reader-facing brainstorm deliverable for PI / PhD discussion. **Skip if**: you only need an internal shortlist and do not want a final memo. **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: do not invent papers; all final directions must remain anchored to the shortlist and core set.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills/tree/main/.codex/skills/idea-memo-writer
SKILL.md
Idea Memo Writer
Goal: turn the shortlist into a discussion-ready memo.
Load Order
Always read:
references/overview.mdreferences/report_structure.md
Script Boundary
Use scripts/run.py only for:
- deterministic assembly of the report from trace artifacts
- calling
tooling/ideation.pylibrary functions for rendering
Do not treat run.py as the place for:
- ideation heuristics or scoring logic
- hardcoded report prose templates
The final memo should feel like:
- an advisor-ready discussion memo rather than workflow notes,
- paper-specific in its evidence hooks and appendix reading guide,
- explicit about rank logic and quick kill criteria,
and still feel like:
- a strong brainstorming artifact,
- grounded in the literature,
- rich enough for PI/PhD discussion,
- but not frozen into a rigid project execution spec.
Script
Quick Start
python .codex/skills/idea-memo-writer/scripts/run.py --workspace workspaces/<ws>
All Options
--workspace <dir>(required)--unit-id <U###>--inputs <semicolon-separated>--outputs <semicolon-separated>--checkpoint <C#>
Examples
- Assemble the brainstorm memo for a workspace:
python .codex/skills/idea-memo-writer/scripts/run.py --workspace workspaces/brainstorm-llm-agents
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
thesis-compile-review
对中文毕业论文进行编译、warning 分级、模板模式检查、数据与引用复查，并把问题回写成可继续迭代的 review checklist。 **Trigger**: 毕业论文编译检查, thesis compile review, warning 分级, 终稿复查, main.pdf 检查. **Use when**: 论文已经回写到 TeX 交付层，需要确认是否真正达到“可提交”的质量，而不是只做到能编译。 **Skip if**: 还处于中间层重构阶段，`chapters/*.tex` 尚未形成稳定交付稿。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里重构章节主线；如果发现结构问题，明确回退到上游修复。
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
front-matter-writer
Write the survey's front matter files (Abstract, Introduction, Related Work, Discussion, Conclusion) in paper voice, with high citation density and a single evidence-policy paragraph. **Trigger**: front matter writer, introduction writer, related work writer, abstract writer, discussion writer, conclusion writer, 引言, 相关工作, 摘要, 讨论, 结论. **Use when**: you are in C5 (prose allowed) and need the paper-like shell to stop the draft reading like stitched subsections. **Skip if**: `Approve C2` is missing in `DECISIONS.md`, or `citations/ref.bib` is missing. **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: no invented facts/citations; no pipeline jargon in final prose; no repeated evidence disclaimers; only use keys present in `citations/ref.bib`.
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
thesis-question-list
维护中文毕业论文的 `codex_md/question_list.md`：把本轮问题、边界、优先级、协作方案和验收口径结构化，作为整条 thesis pipeline 的控制面。 **Trigger**: 毕业论文问题清单, thesis question list, 论文修改清单, 本轮目标, 结构问题梳理, review问题整理. **Use when**: 你已经有一批材料或上一轮 review 结果，需要明确这一轮到底修什么、不修什么，并给后续重构与编译复查提供统一入口。 **Skip if**: 当前只是在做一次性局部措辞修改，且没有形成新一轮结构/证据/编译问题。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 不在这里写正文；不把问题单写成长篇散文；每条问题必须可执行、可验收。
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
novelty-matrix
Create a novelty/prior-work matrix comparing the submission’s contributions against related work (overlaps vs deltas). **Trigger**: novelty matrix, prior-work matrix, overlap/delta, 相关工作对比, 新颖性矩阵. **Use when**: peer review 中评估 novelty/positioning，需要把贡献与相关工作逐项对齐并写出差异点证据。 **Skip if**: 缺少 claims（先跑 `claims-extractor`）或你不打算做新颖性定位分析。 **Network**: none (retrieval of additional related work is out-of-scope unless provided). **Guardrail**: 明确 overlap 与 delta；尽量给出可追溯证据来源（来自稿件/引用/作者陈述）。
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
protocol-writer
Write a systematic review protocol into `output/PROTOCOL.md` (databases, queries, inclusion/exclusion, time window, extraction fields). **Trigger**: protocol, PRISMA, systematic review, inclusion/exclusion, 检索式, 纳入排除. **Use when**: systematic review pipeline 的起点（C1），需要先锁定 protocol 再开始 screening/extraction。 **Skip if**: 不是做 systematic review（或 protocol 已经锁定且不允许修改）。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: protocol 必须包含可执行的检索与筛选规则；需要 HUMAN 签字后才能进入 screening。
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
rubric-writer
Write a rubric-based peer review report (`output/REVIEW.md`) using extracted claims and evidence gaps (novelty/soundness/clarity/impact). **Trigger**: rubric review, referee report, peer review write-up, 审稿报告, REVIEW.md. **Use when**: peer-review pipeline 的最后阶段（C3），已有 `output/CLAIMS.md` + `output/MISSING_EVIDENCE.md`（以及可选 novelty matrix）。 **Skip if**: 上游产物未就绪（claims/evidence gaps 缺失）或你不打算输出完整审稿报告。 **Network**: none. **Guardrail**: 给可执行建议（actionable feedback），并覆盖 novelty/soundness/clarity/impact；避免泛泛而谈。
Didn't find tool you were looking for?