Agent skill
Human-Machine Brainstorm (人机风暴)
This skill should be used when the user asks to "人机风暴", "Human-Machine Brainstorm", "human storm", "ccb brainstorm", "需求对齐调度", "spec convergence", or wants a CCB-based multi-model requirement alignment loop with Codex as the dispatcher.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/cnfjlhj/ai-collab-playbook/tree/main/skills/full/human-machine-brainstorm
SKILL.md
Human-Machine Brainstorm (HMB) — CCB Dispatcher Loop
Purpose
Run a repeatable multi-model requirement alignment loop in CCB where:
- Codex acts as the dispatcher (facilitator + router).
- Claude Code acts as the scribe (single source of truth spec author).
- OpenCode (Gemini) acts as the divergent thinker (alternatives + ASCII prototypes).
Keep every round auditable by exporting per-provider context into ./.ccb/history/ and keeping the canonical spec in ./.ccb/spec/.
Hard Rules
- Treat
./.ccb/spec/overview.mdas the single source of truth. Only Claude Code edits it. - Never assume panes “share context”. Always broadcast updates explicitly.
- Enforce question IDs in this format:
- Claude:
C-Q01,C-Q02, ... - OpenCode:
O-Q01,O-Q02, ...
- Claude:
- Accept user answers only in ID-addressed form (so routing is deterministic).
Quick Start (zero-friction, recommended)
This workflow is optimized for a 2×Codex setup:
- Cmd pane runs a dedicated Codex Chair (dispatcher).
- The normal Codex provider pane participates as a reviewer/solver (not just idle).
-
Create (or choose) a topic directory (recommended location:
$HOME/ccb-startups/...).- Optional helper:
bash $HOME/.codex/skills/human-machine-brainstorm/scripts/hmb-init.sh "<topic-slug>"
- Optional helper:
-
Start CCB.
- If CCB global config enables the chair cmd pane, just run:
ccb - Otherwise:
ccb claude codex opencode cmd(fallback)
- If CCB global config enables the chair cmd pane, just run:
-
Talk only to the Codex Chair (cmd pane).
- Paste the raw requirement.
- The chair broadcasts to
claude,opencode, and participantcodexviaask. - Use the round prompt template in
references/round_prompt_template.mdif needed.
Round Loop (R1/R2/R3...)
Step A — Broadcast (dispatcher = Codex Chair)
Send the same “Round prompt” to:
ask claude "<ROUND PROMPT>"ask opencode "<ROUND PROMPT>"ask codex "<ROUND PROMPT>"(participant Codex pane)
Require them to respond with:
- 10–20 numbered questions using
C-Q##/O-Q##/P-Q## - 1 ASCII diagram (flow/state/component)
- 1 short “current assumptions” list
Step B — Collect Answers (human)
Ask the human to answer in this format:
C-Q01: ...C-Q02: ...O-Q01: ...P-Q01: ...
Optionally allow a shared block:
SHARED: ...(facts that apply to both)
Step C — Route Answers (dispatcher = Codex)
Send Claude only C-* + SHARED.
Send OpenCode only O-* + SHARED.
Send participant Codex only P-* + SHARED.
Step D — Export Evidence (end of round)
From the cmd pane (or any shell pane) run:
./.ccb/bin/round-save.sh 20
This writes:
./.ccb/history/claude-<timestamp>.md./.ccb/history/codex-<timestamp>.md./.ccb/history/opencode-<timestamp>.md
Step E — Update Spec (scribe = Claude Code)
Ask Claude to update:
./.ccb/spec/overview.md(bump version vN)./.ccb/spec/open_questions.md(close answered questions)./.ccb/spec/decisions.md(record non-reversible decisions)./.ccb/spec/changelog.md(vN → vN+1 diff)
Then re-run another round until all reviewers say “no blocking issues”.
Final Handoff to GPT-5.2 (new session)
Provide a clean handoff pack:
./.ccb/spec/overview.md./.ccb/spec/decisions.md./.ccb/spec/open_questions.md(should be empty or non-blocking)./.ccb/spec/changelog.md
Instruct GPT-5.2 to:
- Treat the spec as authoritative
- Output an executable plan first
- Use multi-agent decomposition for implementation/testing/review
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
paperreview
Use when the user explicitly wants to upload a final or near-final PDF to paperreview.ai for an external second opinion. Skip this for local paper critique, which should go through `paper-review-pipeline` first.
skill-governance-loop
Use when the user asks to review a skill, analyze skill quality, update a skill version, or run a repeatable keep/disable/archive decision loop from real failures instead of abstract best practices.
academic-paper-helper
学术论文写作助手,专门用于 LaTeX 论文编写、BibTeX 管理、格式化、学术写作规范检查。适用于 AI/ML 研究论文、会议投稿(NeurIPS、ICML、ICLR 等)
collaborating-with-claude
Use when you want Claude Code CLI as a second opinion for coding tasks such as design tradeoffs, debugging, or diff review, while keeping Codex as the primary implementer.
proactive-explorer
落实 CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md 中的“主动探索”原则,在向用户提问前自动使用 Grep、Read、Bash、WebSearch 等工具获取信息
writing-anti-ai
This skill should be used when the user asks to "remove AI writing patterns", "humanize this text", "make this sound more natural", "remove AI-generated traces", "fix robotic writing", or needs to eliminate AI writing patterns from prose. Supports both English and Chinese text. Based on Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing" guide, detects and fixes inflated symbolism, promotional language, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, AI vocabulary, negative parallelisms, and excessive conjunctive phrases.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?