Agent skill
gtm-pricing
B2B go-to-market strategy, pricing models, ICP development, positioning, and competitive intelligence. Use when planning GTM strategy, setting pricing, defining ICP, or evaluating opportunities.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/ScientiaCapital/skills/tree/main/active/gtm-pricing-skill
SKILL.md
<quick_start> ICP scoring: 80+ = Ideal | 60-79 = Good | 40-59 = Marginal | <40 = Pass
Positioning statement:
For [target] who [need], [product] is a [category] that [benefit].
Unlike [alternative], our product [differentiator].
Value-based pricing: Price at 10-20% of quantified value delivered
Opportunity score: /100 across Market Fit, Technical Fit, GTM Fit, Personal Fit, Economics </quick_start>
<success_criteria> GTM strategy is successful when:
- ICP documented with scoring criteria (firmographics, technographics, psychographics)
- Positioning statement follows April Dunford framework
- Pricing anchored to quantified value (not cost-plus)
- Tier structure follows Good/Better/Best with clear feature gates
- Opportunity scoring identifies red flags and good signals
- Battle cards created for top 3 competitors
- Launch checklist completed (pre-launch, launch, post-launch) </success_criteria>
<core_content> Comprehensive guide for B2B go-to-market strategy, pricing, and opportunity evaluation.
Quick Reference
| Framework | Purpose | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| ICP Development | Define ideal customer | Before any outreach |
| Positioning | Differentiate in market | Product launch, pivot |
| Messaging Hierarchy | Consistent communication | Sales enablement |
| Competitive Intel | Understand landscape | Deal strategy, positioning |
| Value-Based Pricing | Price by value delivered | Setting initial prices |
| Tier Structure | Package offering | Feature gating decisions |
| Opportunity Scoring | Evaluate fit | New client/project decisions |
Part 1: Go-To-Market Strategy
ICP Development Framework
Build your ICP across three dimensions, then score each prospect:
Dimension 1 -- Firmographics (who they are):
- Company size: employee count range, revenue range
- Industry: primary verticals, secondary, and explicitly excluded
- Geography: target regions, excluded regions
- Company type: startup, growth-stage, enterprise, SMB
- Funding stage: bootstrapped, seed, Series A-D, public/PE-backed
Dimension 2 -- Technographics (what they use):
- Required stack: must-have tech, nice-to-have, incompatible
- Tech maturity: early adopter, early majority, late majority, laggard
- Current solutions: CRM, ERP, industry-specific tools
- Integration requirements: what your product must connect to
- Pain indicators: manual processes, disconnected systems, spreadsheet workarounds
Dimension 3 -- Psychographics (how they buy):
- Awareness stage: unaware, problem-aware, solution-aware, product-aware
- Buying committee: economic buyer, technical buyer, user buyer, champion, blocker
- Decision criteria: primary (speed, cost, features) and secondary
- Risk tolerance: budget concerns, implementation risk, change management, vendor stability
ICP Scoring Rubric:
| Score | Label | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 80-100 | Ideal | Prioritize -- full outreach cadence, executive sponsorship |
| 60-79 | Good | Pursue -- standard cadence, qualify thoroughly |
| 40-59 | Marginal | Conditional -- only if specific signal changes (budget, timing) |
| <40 | Pass | Decline -- opportunity cost too high |
Behavioral Signals to Watch:
- High intent: searched for competitor alternatives, visited pricing page 3+ times, downloaded buyer's guide
- Medium intent: attended webinar, engaged with case study, connected on LinkedIn
- Low intent: blog subscriber, social follower, newsletter open
ICP Validation Checklist:
- TAM/SAM/SOM calculated with minimum 1,000 companies in ICP
- Historical win rate against ICP >30%
- ICP customers have lowest churn and highest NPS
- Sales team, CS, and product all agree on the profile
See reference/gtm.md for full YAML ICP worksheet templates and an example ICP (MEP contractors).
Positioning (April Dunford Framework)
The 5 Components of Positioning:
- Competitive alternatives -- What would customers use if you didn't exist? (Not just direct competitors -- include spreadsheets, manual processes, hiring, doing nothing)
- Unique attributes -- What do you have that alternatives don't? (Features, architecture, team expertise, data, integrations)
- Value -- What does the unique attribute enable for customers? (Time saved, revenue gained, risk reduced, cost avoided)
- Target customer -- Who cares most about that value? (The segment where your strengths matter most)
- Market category -- What market do you position in? (Existing category, subcategory, or create new category)
Positioning Statement Template:
For [target customer segment] who [key need/pain],
[product name] is a [market category]
that [primary value proposition].
Unlike [competitive alternative],
our product [key differentiator tied to unique attribute].
Messaging Hierarchy (3 levels, max 3 differentiators each):
| Level | Audience | Message Type |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic | C-suite, board | Business outcomes, ROI, risk reduction |
| Solution | Directors, VPs | Capability, integration, workflow improvement |
| Persona | End users, admins | Features, UX, daily workflow benefits |
Competitive Battle Card Essentials: For each top-3 competitor, document:
- Overview: founded, HQ, funding, target market, pricing model
- Strengths (acknowledge honestly -- credibility requires it)
- Weaknesses mapped to your advantages
- Common objections with value-based responses
- Win strategy: lead differentiator, proof point, reference story
- Questions to ask the prospect that expose competitor weaknesses
See reference/gtm.md for battle card template, positioning examples, and competitive positioning framework.
GTM Motion and Launch
GTM Motion Selection:
| Motion | ACV | Sales Cycle | Team Needed | CAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product-Led Growth (PLG) | <$5K | Days | Growth/product | Low |
| Sales-Assisted | $5-50K | Weeks | SDR + AE | Medium |
| Enterprise | $50K+ | Months | AE + SE + CSM | High |
| Partner/Channel | Variable | Variable | Partner Manager | Variable |
Channel Mix: 60-70% primary motion, 20-30% secondary, 10% experimental.
Launch Checklist Milestones:
- T-30 (Pre-launch): ICP validated, positioning finalized, messaging hierarchy complete, battle cards created, pricing approved, sales team trained, demo environment stable
- T-0 (Launch): Website updated, outbound sequences activated, press release distributed, social campaign live, partner notifications sent
- T+30 (Post-launch): Win/loss analysis started, messaging refined from feedback, pipeline reviewed, competitive response documented, metrics dashboard active
See reference/gtm.md for full launch checklists, channel strategy details, and complexity-to-resource matching.
Part 2: Pricing Strategy
Value-Based Pricing Method
Step 1 -- Quantify customer value:
Total Value = Time Savings + Revenue Impact + Cost Avoidance
Time Savings: Hours saved/month x Hourly rate x 12
Revenue Impact: Additional revenue enabled per year
Cost Avoidance: Costs eliminated or reduced per year
Step 2 -- Set price at 10-20% of quantified value:
- 10% = conservative (easy sell, high perceived value)
- 15% = balanced (standard B2B SaaS)
- 20% = aggressive (strong differentiation required)
Step 3 -- Validate against willingness-to-pay:
- Van Westendorp price sensitivity: ask "too cheap / cheap / expensive / too expensive"
- Competitive benchmarking: where do alternatives price?
- Customer interviews: "Would you pay $X for Y outcome?"
Pricing Models
| Model | Best For | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flat rate | Simple products | Easy to understand | Doesn't scale with value |
| Per seat | Team tools | Predictable, scales with org | Discourages adoption |
| Usage-based | APIs, infra | Aligns cost with value | Unpredictable revenue |
| Tiered (Good/Better/Best) | Feature differentiation | Anchoring, clear upgrade path | Complex to design |
| Hybrid (seat + usage) | Enterprise SaaS | Predictable base + upside | Complex billing |
Tier Design (Good/Better/Best)
Tier structure principles:
- 3-4 tiers optimal (more creates decision paralysis)
- Middle tier should be your target -- it gets the "Most Popular" badge
- Top tier makes middle tier look reasonable (price anchoring)
- Free tier only if PLG motion (land, qualify, viral growth)
Feature Gating Rules:
| Gate By | Examples | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Scale | Users, API calls, storage, projects | Usage naturally grows with value |
| Sophistication | Advanced analytics, AI features, workflows | Features require maturity to use |
| Control | SSO, SAML, audit logs, custom roles | Enterprise compliance needs |
| Support | SLA, dedicated CSM, phone support | Willingness to pay for service |
Never gate: Security features, data export, basic integrations. Gating these breeds resentment and churn.
Discounting Strategy
| Type | Trigger | Range | Use When |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volume | Commitment to scale | 10-30% | Large seat count, multi-year |
| Term | Annual commitment | 15-25% | Monthly-to-annual conversion |
| Competitive | Switching from competitor | 20-40% | Match remaining contract value |
| Strategic | Reference customer, logo value | Up to 50% | Brand-name + case study commitment |
Protect your pricing -- never discount when:
- Customer hasn't articulated the value they'll receive
- No competitive pressure exists
- You're early in negotiation (discount later, not first)
- Customer is purely price-shopping (they'll churn anyway)
Alternatives to discounting: Extended payment terms, additional training/onboarding, extended trial period, success-milestone feature unlocks, multi-year lock-in at current rate.
Key SaaS Pricing Metrics
| Metric | Target | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| LTV | >3x CAC | ARPU / monthly churn rate |
| CAC Payback | <12 months | CAC / ARPU |
| NRR | >100% | (Start MRR + expansion - contraction - churn) / Start MRR |
| Gross Margin | >70% | (Revenue - COGS) / Revenue |
See reference/pricing.md for per-model deep dives, price increase playbook, services pricing, productized service model, and revenue model templates.
Part 3: Opportunity Evaluation
Quick Score (/100)
| Dimension | Points | What to Assess |
|---|---|---|
| Market Fit | 25 | Problem clarity (10), market size (8), timing (7) |
| Technical Fit | 20 | Can I build it (10), infrastructure fit (5), maintenance burden (5) |
| GTM Fit | 20 | Sales complexity (8), channel access (7), competition (5) |
| Personal Fit | 20 | Interest/energy (8), growth potential (7), lifestyle fit (5) |
| Economics | 15 | Revenue potential (8), time to revenue (4), risk/reward (3) |
Score Interpretation and Action
| Score | Action | Next Step |
|---|---|---|
| 80-100 | STRONG PURSUE | Prioritize immediately, allocate resources |
| 60-79 | EXPLORE | Worth a time-boxed deep dive (1-2 weeks) |
| 40-59 | CONDITIONAL | Park it -- revisit only if a specific factor changes |
| 0-39 | PASS | Decline -- opportunity cost too high |
Red Flags (Automatic Deductions)
Any of these should subtract 10-20 points from your score:
- Unclear payment terms: "We'll figure out compensation later"
- Expanding scope pre-start: Requirements growing before contract signed
- Pressure to decide fast: "We need an answer by Friday" on a major commitment
- Misaligned incentives: Their success doesn't require your success
- Economics don't work even optimistically: If best-case math doesn't pencil, walk away
- Single-threaded champion: Only one person wants this; no organizational buy-in
- No budget allocated: Interested but no approved spend
GTM Complexity Levels
| Level | Buyer | ACV | Cycle | Decision Style |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLG | Individual user | <$2K | Days | User = buyer, self-serve |
| Low-Touch | Manager | $2-15K | 1-4 weeks | Light demo, quick approval |
| Mid-Market | Director/VP | $15-100K | 1-3 months | Committee, multiple stakeholders |
| Enterprise | C-suite | $100K-1M | 6-18 months | RFP, security review, legal |
| Complex | Board-level | $1M+ | 12-36 months | Transformation project |
Match complexity to your resources:
- Solo / side project: target Level 1-2 max
- Small team: target Level 2-3
- Funded startup: target Level 2-4
- Enterprise sales org: target Level 3-5
5-Minute Viability Test
Before deep-diving any opportunity, answer four questions:
- How much will one customer pay? $____/month
- How many customers can I realistically get in 6 months? ____
- What does it cost to serve one customer? $____/month
- How many hours/week will this take? ____
Quick math:
- Monthly revenue at 6 months: #2 x #1
- Monthly costs: #2 x #3
- Monthly margin: Revenue - Costs
- Effective hourly rate: Margin / (hours x 4.33)
- If hourly rate < $100 --> needs rethinking
Build vs Partner vs Buy Decision
| Signal | Build | Partner | Buy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core differentiator | Yes | ||
| Commodity capability | Yes | ||
| Complementary strength | Yes | ||
| Time-critical | Yes | ||
| Learning value high | Yes | ||
| Maintenance burden high | Yes | Yes | |
| No good alternative exists | Yes |
See reference/opportunity.md for detailed scoring rubrics per dimension, full scorecard YAML templates, unit economics worksheets, cost structure analysis, break-even calculations, and build-vs-partner decision trees.
Reference Files
reference/gtm.md- ICP YAML templates, behavioral signals, validation checklist, channel strategy, launch playbooks, battle card template, positioning examplesreference/pricing.md- Model deep dives, tier design, price increase playbook, services pricing, discount framework, SaaS metrics dashboardreference/opportunity.md- Full scoring rubrics (5 sections), scorecard YAML, unit economics, cost analysis, break-even formulas, build/partner/buy decision trees </core_content>
Emit Outcome Sidecar
As the final step, write to ~/.claude/skill-analytics/last-outcome-gtm-pricing.json:
{"ts":"[UTC ISO8601]","skill":"gtm-pricing","version":"1.0.0","variant":"default",
"status":"[success|partial|error]","runtime_ms":[estimated ms from start],
"metrics":{"pricing_models_evaluated":[n],"tiers_designed":[n],"gtm_channels_mapped":[n]},
"error":null,"session_id":"[YYYY-MM-DD]"}
Use status "partial" if some stages failed but results were produced. Use "error" only if no output was generated.
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
project-context
Maintains project context and progress tracking across Claude sessions. Use at session start to load context, on session end to save progress. Triggers: load project context, save context, end session, what was I working on, switch to project, done for today.
workflow-enforcer-skill
Enforces workflow discipline across ALL projects. Ensures Claude checks for specialized agents before responding, announces skill/agent usage, and creates TodoWrite todos for multi-step tasks. Triggers: automatic on all sessions, use the right agent, follow workflow.
subagent-teams
Orchestrate in-session Task tool teams for parallel work. Fan-out research, implementation, review, and documentation across subagents. Use when: parallel tasks, fan-out, subagent team, Task tool, in-session agents.
planning-prompts
Comprehensive skill for project planning and prompt engineering. Covers hierarchical plans (briefs, roadmaps, phases), Claude-to-Claude meta-prompts, and multi-stage workflows. Use when: planning, prompt creation, agentic pipeline work, project roadmap, meta-prompts, research to implement workflow.
linkedin-sales-navigator-alt-skill
Build targeted prospect lists by analyzing LinkedIn profiles, extracting job titles, companies, locations, and recent activity. Identifies decision-makers, tracks job changes for warm outreach, and enriches contact data. Use when users need to find prospects, build lead lists, or track decision-maker movements.
security
Application security patterns - authentication, secrets management, input validation, OWASP Top 10. Use when: auth, JWT, secrets, API keys, SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, RLS, security audit, pen testing basics.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?