Gemini Peer Review

Consult Gemini as a coding peer for a second opinion on code quality, architecture decisions, debugging, or security reviews.

Prerequisites

• gemini-coach CLI installed (wraps Gemini CLI with AI-to-AI prompting)
• Gemini CLI authenticated (gemini to test)

Modes

Code Review

gemini-coach review src/auth.ts src/api.ts

Review specific files for bugs, logic errors, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and best practice violations.

Architecture Advice

gemini-coach architect "Should I use D1 or KV for session storage?" .

Get feedback on design decisions with trade-off analysis. Passing . includes project context.

Debugging Help

gemini-coach debug src/problematic-file.ts

Analyse errors when stuck after 2+ failed fix attempts. Gemini sees the code fresh without your debugging context bias.

Security Scan

gemini-coach security-scan ./src/api/

Scan code for security vulnerabilities (injection, auth bypass, data exposure).

Quick Question

gemini-coach quick "Best way to handle WebSockets in Workers?"

Fast question without file context.

Project Review

gemini-coach project-review "Analyse architecture and suggest improvements" /path/to/project

Full project analysis using Gemini's 1M token context.

When to Use

Good use cases:

• Before committing major changes (final review)
• When stuck debugging after multiple attempts
• Architecture decisions with multiple valid options
• Security-sensitive code review
• "What am I missing?" moments

Avoid using for:

• Simple syntax checks (Claude handles these faster)
• Every single edit (too slow, unnecessary)
• Questions with obvious answers

Model Selection

gemini-coach automatically selects the right model:

Override: GEMINI_MODEL=gemini-2.5-pro gemini-coach review ...

Synthesizing Results

After receiving Gemini's analysis:

1. Present Gemini's findings to the user
2. Add your own perspective — agree/disagree with specific points
3. Let the user decide which recommendations to implement

Reference Files