Agent skill

executing-plans

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute

Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/other/other/executing-plans-axiomantic-spellbook

SKILL.md

Executing Plans

Announce: "Using executing-plans skill to implement this plan."

Invariant Principles

  1. Plan Fidelity: Follow plan steps exactly. Plans encode architect decisions; deviation creates drift. If plan seems wrong, ask - don't silently reinterpret.
  2. Evidence Over Claims: Every task completion requires verification output. Never mark complete without proof. "I ran the tests" without showing output is not evidence.
  3. Blocking Over Guessing: Uncertainty must halt execution. Wrong guesses compound; asking costs one exchange.
  4. Review Before Proceed: No task advances past unaddressed review findings. Spec compliance precedes code quality.
  5. Context Completeness: Subagents receive full task text, never file references. Fresh contexts lack your accumulated knowledge.

Inputs

Input Required Description
Plan document Yes Implementation plan from writing-plans with numbered tasks
Mode preference No batch (default) or subagent - execution strategy
Batch size No Tasks per batch in batch mode (default: 3)

Outputs

Output Type Description
Completed implementation Code All plan tasks implemented and verified
Verification evidence Inline Test output, build results per task
Task completion log TodoWrite Progress tracking with completion status

Mode Selection

Mode Review Type Task Execution Checkpoints
batch (default) Human-in-loop Sequential inline Between batches
subagent Automated two-stage Fresh subagent per task After each task

Use batch when: Architect wants review between batches, tasks tightly coupled, plan needs active discussion.

Use subagent when: Tasks mostly independent, faster iteration desired, want automated spec+quality review.


Autonomous Mode

Check for "Mode: AUTONOMOUS" or explicit autonomous instruction.

Skip: Plan concerns (log for later), "ready for feedback" checkpoints, completion confirmations.

Auto-decide: Batch size (default 3), implementation details (document choice), applying review fixes.


OpenCode Agent Inheritance

Detection: Check system prompt for:

  • "operating in YOLO mode" → CURRENT_AGENT_TYPE = "yolo"
  • "YOLO mode with a focus on precision" → CURRENT_AGENT_TYPE = "yolo-focused"
  • Neither → CURRENT_AGENT_TYPE = "general"

All Task tool calls MUST use CURRENT_AGENT_TYPE as subagent_type.

This ensures subagents inherit autonomous permissions when parent is YOLO. </CRITICAL>

When subagent asks scope question in autonomous mode, MUST use AskUserQuestion:

javascript
AskUserQuestion({
  questions: [
    {
      question:
        "Implementer asks: 'Should this also handle X case?' This affects scope.",
      header: "Scope",
      options: [
        { label: "Yes, include X", description: "Expand scope" },
        {
          label: "No, exclude X (Recommended)",
          description: "Keep minimal per YAGNI",
        },
        { label: "Defer to future task", description: "Note for later" },
      ],
    },
  ],
});

Batch Mode Process

Phase 1: Load and Review Plan

  1. Read plan file
  2. Review critically - identify questions/concerns
  3. If concerns:
    javascript
    AskUserQuestion({
      questions: [
        {
          question: "Found [N] concerns with the plan. How should we proceed?",
          header: "Plan Review",
          options: [
            {
              label: "Discuss concerns",
              description: "Review each before starting",
            },
            {
              label: "Proceed anyway (Recommended if minor)",
              description: "Address as they arise",
            },
            {
              label: "Update plan first",
              description: "Revise to address concerns",
            },
          ],
        },
      ],
    });
    
  4. If no concerns: Create TodoWrite and proceed

Phase 2: Execute Batch

Default first 3 tasks. Per task:

  1. Mark as in_progress
  2. Follow each step exactly (plan has bite-sized steps)
  3. Run verifications as specified
  4. Mark as completed with evidence

Phase 3: Report

When batch complete:

  • Show what was implemented
  • Show verification output
  • Say: "Ready for feedback."

Phase 4: Continue

Based on feedback:

  • Apply changes if needed
  • Execute next batch
  • Repeat until complete

Phase 5: Complete Development

  • Announce: "Using finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
  • REQUIRED: Invoke finishing-a-development-branch skill

Subagent Mode Process

Fresh subagent per task + two-stage review (spec then quality) = high quality, fast iteration.

Phase 1: Extract Tasks

Read plan once. Extract all tasks with full text and context. Create TodoWrite.

Phase 2: Per-Task Execution Loop

For each task:

  1. Dispatch implementer subagent (use ./implementer-prompt.md)
  2. Answer questions if implementer asks any - answer clearly and completely
  3. Implementer implements, tests, commits, self-reviews
  4. Dispatch spec reviewer (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)
    • If issues found: implementer fixes, re-review
    • Loop until spec compliant
  5. Dispatch code quality reviewer (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)
    • If issues found: implementer fixes, re-review
    • Loop until approved
  6. Mark task complete in TodoWrite

Phase 3: Final Review

Dispatch final code reviewer for entire implementation.

Phase 4: Complete Development

  • Announce: "Using finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
  • REQUIRED: Invoke finishing-a-development-branch skill

Stop Conditions

Ask for clarification rather than guessing. The cost of asking is one exchange. The cost of guessing wrong is cascade failure. </CRITICAL>


Anti-Patterns

Handling Subagent Questions

  • Answer clearly and completely before letting them proceed
  • Provide additional context if task references things they don't know
  • If question affects scope: use AskUserQuestion (see circuit breakers)
  • Don't rush implementation; incomplete answers cause rework

Handling Review Issues

  • Implementer (same subagent) fixes issues
  • Reviewer reviews again (never skip re-review)
  • Loop until approved
  • If 3+ cycles: escalate to user

Handling Subagent Failure

  • Dispatch fix subagent with specific instructions
  • Don't fix manually (context pollution)
  • Provide failure context and expected behavior

Self-Check

Before marking execution complete:

  • Every task has verification output shown (tests, build, runtime)
  • No tasks marked complete without evidence
  • All review issues addressed (spec and code quality)
  • Plan followed exactly or deviations explicitly approved
  • finishing-a-development-branch invoked

When to Revisit Earlier Steps

Return to Phase 1 (Load Plan) when:

  • User updates plan based on your feedback
  • Fundamental approach needs rethinking
  • Critical gap discovered mid-execution

Don't force through blockers - stop and ask.


Integration

Required workflow skills:

  • writing-plans - Creates the plan this skill executes
  • requesting-code-review - Code review template for reviewer subagents
  • finishing-a-development-branch - Complete development after all tasks

Subagents should use:

  • test-driven-development - Subagents follow TDD for each task

<FINAL_EMPHASIS> Plans are contracts. Evidence is required. Guessing is forbidden. Your reputation depends on executing faithfully, stopping when uncertain, and never marking complete without proof. </FINAL_EMPHASIS>

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results