Agent skill

dotnet-managedcode-markitdown

Use ManagedCode.MarkItDown when a .NET application needs deterministic document-to-Markdown conversion for ingestion, indexing, summarization, or content-processing workflows.

Stars 302
Forks 22

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/managedcode/dotnet-skills/tree/main/catalog/Libraries/ManagedCode-MarkItDown/skills/dotnet-managedcode-markitdown

SKILL.md

ManagedCode.MarkItDown

Trigger On

  • integrating ManagedCode.MarkItDown into document ingestion flows
  • converting office or rich-text content into Markdown for downstream processing
  • reviewing indexing, chunking, or AI-preparation pipelines that depend on Markdown output
  • documenting file-conversion steps for a .NET application

Workflow

  1. Identify the document sources the app actually handles.
  2. Decide where Markdown conversion belongs in the pipeline:
    • before indexing
    • before chunking
    • before AI summarization or enrichment
  3. Keep conversion isolated behind one ingestion or processing service instead of scattering format handling everywhere.
  4. Validate real converted output for structure, links, headings, and attachment handling.
  5. Document which downstream stage depends on the produced Markdown.
mermaid
flowchart LR
  A["Input document"] --> B["ManagedCode.MarkItDown conversion"]
  B --> C["Markdown output"]
  C --> D["Indexing, chunking, or AI workflow"]

Deliver

  • guidance on where ManagedCode.MarkItDown fits in a real processing pipeline
  • conversion-boundary recommendations for application design
  • output-validation expectations for document ingestion

Validate

  • the converted Markdown is good enough for the actual downstream consumer
  • conversion is isolated in one clear pipeline step
  • tests or review samples cover the real input formats the application claims to support

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

managedcode/dotnet-skills

dotnet-project-setup

Create or reorganize .NET solutions with clean project boundaries, repeatable SDK settings, and a maintainable baseline for libraries, apps, tests, CI, and local development.

302 22
Explore
managedcode/dotnet-skills

csharp-scripts

Run single-file C# programs as scripts (file-based apps) for quick experimentation, prototyping, and concept testing. Use when the user wants to write and execute a small C# program without creating a full project.

302 22
Explore
managedcode/dotnet-skills

dotnet-pinvoke

Correctly call native (C/C++) libraries from .NET using P/Invoke and LibraryImport. Covers function signatures, string marshalling, memory lifetime, SafeHandle, and cross-platform patterns. USE FOR: writing new P/Invoke or LibraryImport declarations, reviewing or debugging existing native interop code, wrapping a C or C++ library for use in .NET, diagnosing crashes, memory leaks, or corruption at the managed/native boundary. DO NOT USE FOR: COM interop, C++/CLI mixed-mode assemblies, or pure managed code with no native dependencies.

302 22
Explore
managedcode/dotnet-skills

nuget-trusted-publishing

Set up NuGet trusted publishing (OIDC) on a GitHub Actions repo — replaces long-lived API keys with short-lived tokens. USE FOR: trusted publishing, NuGet OIDC, keyless NuGet publish, migrate from NuGet API key, NuGet/login, secure NuGet publishing. DO NOT USE FOR: publishing to private feeds or Azure Artifacts (OIDC is nuget.org only). INVOKES: shell (powershell or bash), edit, create, ask_user for guided repo setup.

302 22
Explore
managedcode/dotnet-skills

dotnet-legacy-aspnet

Maintain classic ASP.NET applications on .NET Framework, including Web Forms, older MVC, and legacy hosting patterns, while planning realistic modernization boundaries.

302 22
Explore
managedcode/dotnet-skills

dotnet-code-review

Review .NET changes for bugs, regressions, architectural drift, missing tests, incorrect async or disposal behavior, and platform-specific pitfalls before you approve or merge them.

302 22
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results