Agent skill

dotnet-asynkron-profiler

Use the open-source free `Asynkron.Profiler` dotnet tool for CLI-first CPU, allocation, exception, contention, and heap profiling of .NET commands or existing trace artifacts.

Stars 302
Forks 22

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/managedcode/dotnet-skills/tree/main/catalog/Tools/Asynkron-Profiler/skills/dotnet-asynkron-profiler

SKILL.md

Asynkron.Profiler

Trigger On

  • the repo wants Asynkron.Profiler or asynkron-profiler
  • the user wants automation-friendly profiling output instead of GUI-only tooling
  • profiling needs are CPU, allocation, exception, contention, or heap focused and should land as plain-text summaries in CI, scripts, or agent workflows
  • the task needs to render an existing .nettrace, .speedscope.json, .etlx, or .gcdump file into a readable report

Workflow

  1. Decide whether the task is a new profile capture or rendering an existing trace artifact.
  2. Prefer built Release output over dotnet run so the trace represents the target app rather than restore/build noise.
  3. Install and verify all three tools before assuming the profiler is usable:
    • asynkron-profiler
    • dotnet-trace
    • dotnet-gcdump
  4. Choose exactly one primary mode first:
    • --cpu
    • --memory
    • --exception
    • --contention
    • --heap
  5. Use --input <path> when the trace already exists and the task is about rendering or narrowing the report, not recollecting data.
  6. Refine the output only after the baseline run:
    • --root <text> to anchor the call tree
    • --filter <text> to trim tables
    • --exception-type <text> for exception-heavy flows
    • --calltree-depth, --calltree-width, --calltree-self, --calltree-sibling-cutoff
  7. Treat profile-output/ as the stable output folder for review artifacts and reruns.
  8. If the task needs process attach, counters, or raw official diagnostics flows rather than this CLI frontend, hand off to dotnet-profiling.

Architecture

mermaid
flowchart LR
  A["Profiling task"] --> B{"New run or existing artifact?"}
  B -->|New run| C["Build target in Release"]
  C --> D["Run `asynkron-profiler --mode -- <command|csproj|sln>`"]
  D --> E["Collect via `dotnet-trace` or `dotnet-gcdump`"]
  E --> F["Write reports to `profile-output/`"]
  B -->|Existing artifact| G["Run `asynkron-profiler --input <path> [--mode]`"]
  G --> F
  F --> H["Refine output with `--root`, `--filter`, and call tree flags"]

Install

  • Install the profiler tool from upstream:
bash
dotnet tool install -g asynkron-profiler --prerelease
  • Install prerequisites:
bash
dotnet tool install -g dotnet-trace
dotnet tool install -g dotnet-gcdump
  • Verify the toolchain:
bash
asynkron-profiler --help
dotnet-trace --version
dotnet-gcdump --version

Practical Usage

Capture a new profile

bash
dotnet build -c Release
asynkron-profiler --cpu -- ./bin/Release/<tfm>/MyApp

Framework-dependent apps can run through dotnet:

bash
asynkron-profiler --memory -- dotnet ./bin/Release/<tfm>/MyApp.dll

Project and solution paths are also valid when the tool should build and run for you:

bash
asynkron-profiler --contention -- ./MyApp.csproj
asynkron-profiler --exception -- ./MySolution.sln

Render an existing trace

bash
asynkron-profiler --input ./profile-output/app.nettrace --cpu
asynkron-profiler --input ./profile-output/app.etlx --memory
asynkron-profiler --input ./profile-output/app.gcdump --heap

Manual collection with the official tools still fits when the trace must be captured separately:

bash
dotnet-trace collect --output ./profile-output/app.nettrace -- dotnet run MyProject.sln
asynkron-profiler --input ./profile-output/app.nettrace --cpu

Option Patterns

  • mode flags:
    • --cpu for sampled hotspots
    • --memory for GC allocation ticks and per-type call trees
    • --exception for thrown counts and throw-site trees
    • --contention for wait-time trees
    • --heap for retained heap shape via dotnet-gcdump
  • scope and readability:
    • --root <text> to focus the tree on a subsystem
    • --filter <text> to narrow function tables
    • --exception-type <text> when one exception dominates the signal
  • output shaping:
    • --calltree-depth <n>
    • --calltree-width <n>
    • --calltree-self
    • --calltree-sibling-cutoff <n>
  • trace replay and project targeting:
    • --input <path> for .nettrace, .speedscope.json, .etlx, or .gcdump
    • --tfm <tfm> when the profiler must resolve a specific target framework from a .csproj or .sln

Constraints

  • upstream currently documents .NET SDK 10.x as the supported toolchain baseline
  • dotnet run is supported but usually produces noisy traces because it captures host, restore, and build work
  • the tool is a frontend over dotnet-trace and dotnet-gcdump, so missing prerequisites or blocked diagnostics IPC will break runs
  • --heap captures retained heap shape, not CPU or allocation timelines
  • this skill is for launched commands or existing trace files; if the task is process attach, counters, or raw trace authoring, prefer dotnet-profiling

Deliver

  • a repeatable asynkron-profiler command path for the profiling mode that matches the problem
  • explicit install and prerequisite commands
  • a clear baseline command plus any focused --root, --filter, --exception-type, or call-tree options needed for readable output
  • trace replay guidance when the task starts from an existing artifact

Validate

  • asynkron-profiler --help, dotnet-trace --version, and dotnet-gcdump --version all succeed
  • the chosen profiling mode matches the question being investigated
  • the command profiles built Release output unless there is a documented reason to accept dotnet run noise
  • profile-output/ contains the expected report or artifact after the run
  • any replay flow uses an input file type that matches the selected mode

References

  • overview.md - tool positioning, install paths, prerequisites, and when to choose it over raw diagnostics CLIs
  • commands.md - command patterns for capture, replay, and option tuning
  • examples.md - mode-by-mode examples, output expectations, and troubleshooting checks

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

managedcode/dotnet-skills

dotnet-project-setup

Create or reorganize .NET solutions with clean project boundaries, repeatable SDK settings, and a maintainable baseline for libraries, apps, tests, CI, and local development.

302 22
Explore
managedcode/dotnet-skills

csharp-scripts

Run single-file C# programs as scripts (file-based apps) for quick experimentation, prototyping, and concept testing. Use when the user wants to write and execute a small C# program without creating a full project.

302 22
Explore
managedcode/dotnet-skills

dotnet-pinvoke

Correctly call native (C/C++) libraries from .NET using P/Invoke and LibraryImport. Covers function signatures, string marshalling, memory lifetime, SafeHandle, and cross-platform patterns. USE FOR: writing new P/Invoke or LibraryImport declarations, reviewing or debugging existing native interop code, wrapping a C or C++ library for use in .NET, diagnosing crashes, memory leaks, or corruption at the managed/native boundary. DO NOT USE FOR: COM interop, C++/CLI mixed-mode assemblies, or pure managed code with no native dependencies.

302 22
Explore
managedcode/dotnet-skills

nuget-trusted-publishing

Set up NuGet trusted publishing (OIDC) on a GitHub Actions repo — replaces long-lived API keys with short-lived tokens. USE FOR: trusted publishing, NuGet OIDC, keyless NuGet publish, migrate from NuGet API key, NuGet/login, secure NuGet publishing. DO NOT USE FOR: publishing to private feeds or Azure Artifacts (OIDC is nuget.org only). INVOKES: shell (powershell or bash), edit, create, ask_user for guided repo setup.

302 22
Explore
managedcode/dotnet-skills

dotnet-legacy-aspnet

Maintain classic ASP.NET applications on .NET Framework, including Web Forms, older MVC, and legacy hosting patterns, while planning realistic modernization boundaries.

302 22
Explore
managedcode/dotnet-skills

dotnet-code-review

Review .NET changes for bugs, regressions, architectural drift, missing tests, incorrect async or disposal behavior, and platform-specific pitfalls before you approve or merge them.

302 22
Explore

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results