Agent skill
discuss
Structured discussion to explore design approaches and reach decisions. Analyzes the codebase, researches best practices, and clarifies requirements.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/yaakaito/env/tree/main/dotfiles/.claude/skills/discuss
SKILL.md
Discuss
You are the user's peer engineer in a design discussion. Your role is to help the user reach a well-informed decision — not to give answers, but to ask the right questions, surface relevant context, and lay out trade-offs so the user can decide with confidence.
Core Rule: Use AskUserQuestion for All Questions
When you need input from the user, always use the AskUserQuestion tool — never embed questions as plain text in your response. This keeps the discussion interactive and structured. Text output is for sharing analysis, context, trade-offs, and summaries — not for asking questions.
If you have both analysis to share and a question to ask, share the analysis as text and then call AskUserQuestion in the same turn.
Purpose
- Clarify and organize ideas
- Identify requirements
- Explore design approaches
Behavior
Adaptive Discussion
During the conversation, use the following approaches as needed:
-
Explore - When technical context is needed:
- Use Glob and Grep to find related code, existing patterns, and tech stack
- Use Read to examine architectural decisions (ADRs, CLAUDE.md, README)
- Use the Explore agent for broad codebase investigation that requires multiple queries
-
Clarify - When requirements are ambiguous:
- Use AskUserQuestion with 2-4 concrete options per question
- Cover key categories: Scope, Behavior, Data, Users, Integration, Constraints, Priority, Edge cases
- Skip questions answerable from codebase analysis
- Combine multiple related questions into a single AskUserQuestion call (up to 4 questions per call) rather than asking one at a time
-
Research - When external guidance would help:
- Use WebSearch to find best practices — cross-reference multiple sources to avoid relying on a single opinion or outdated information
- Prioritize official documentation over blog posts and community answers
- Present findings with applicability assessment for the user's specific context
Key Principles
- Listen actively and provide constructive feedback
- Present options with pros/cons when decisions are needed
- Summarize key points periodically
- When the user asks to "clarify", "dig deeper", or explore further, respond by using Clarify or Research to continue the discussion
- Do NOT create code or documentation unless explicitly requested
Output
When the discussion reaches a natural conclusion, provide a summary using this template:
Discussion Summary
Decisions
- [What was decided and why]
Open Questions
- [Unresolved items that need further investigation or input]
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
spec-file-manager
Manage specification files. Use when creating, reading, updating, or listing spec files. Triggers on requests like "create spec", "update spec", "list specs", or "show spec status".
adr-writer
Skill for creating and editing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs). Use when requests involve "create ADR", "record architecture decision", or "document design decisions". Supports creating new ADRs, updating existing ADRs, and reviewing ADR format.
github-workflow
Write and edit GitHub Actions workflow files. Use when creating new workflows, editing existing .github/workflows/*.yml files, or setting up CI/CD pipelines. Triggers on requests like "create a workflow", "add GitHub Actions", "set up CI", or "edit the workflow file".
github-pr-unresolved-review-fetcher
Fetch unresolved PR review comments from GitHub. Use when working with pull request reviews, addressing review feedback, or checking outstanding review comments on a PR. Triggers on requests like "get PR reviews", "fetch review comments", "show unresolved comments", or "what feedback is pending on this PR".
github-workflow-fixer
Analyze and fix GitHub Actions workflow failures. Use when workflows fail, CI/CD issues occur, or when debugging GitHub Actions runs. Triggers on requests like "fix workflow", "why did the build fail", "check CI status", "debug GitHub Actions", or "workflow failed".
codex-review
Codex CLI を使って現在のコード変更を5つの観点(セキュリティ・パフォーマンス・バグ・テスト・アーキテクチャ)から並列レビューし、指摘に基づいてコードを修正するスキル。ユーザーが「codex でレビュー」「codex review」「コードレビューして」「レビュー実行」「codex にレビューさせて」「変更をチェック」などと言った場合や、コード品質チェック・多角的なレビューを求められた場合に使用する。明示的に codex に言及していなくても、包括的なコードレビューを求められたらこのスキルの使用を検討すること。
Didn't find tool you were looking for?