Agent skill

dev-perf

Performance profiling via Aspire traces

Stars 163
Forks 31

Install this agent skill to your Project

npx add-skill https://github.com/majiayu000/claude-skill-registry/tree/main/skills/other/other/dev-perf

SKILL.md

Performance Profiling

Investigate and resolve performance issues using .NET Aspire distributed tracing. Analyzes trace span patterns to identify N+1 queries, excessive aggregate rehydration, and missing projections.

When to Use

  • An endpoint feels slow or returns high latency
  • You suspect N+1 database/storage reads
  • After adding new data access code and want to verify efficiency
  • Comparing before/after performance of an optimization

Prerequisites

  • Aspire AppHost running (all resources healthy)
  • The Aspire MCP server connected (provides mcp__aspire__* tools)

Instructions for Claude

Phase 1: Verify Environment

Check that the Aspire AppHost is running and the API is healthy.

mcp__aspire__list_resources

Confirm the target resource (usually api) shows Running / Healthy. If not, check console logs:

mcp__aspire__list_console_logs  resourceName: "<resource>"

If the AppHost is not running, tell the user and stop.

Phase 2: Generate Traces

If the user provided a specific endpoint or URL, exercise it to generate a trace:

bash
# Login (if auth required) and hit the endpoint
curl -s -c /tmp/perf-cookies.txt -X POST 'http://localhost:5132/api/auth/dev-login' \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"isAdmin":true}'

curl -s -b /tmp/perf-cookies.txt -D /tmp/perf-headers.txt \
  'http://localhost:5132/api/<endpoint>' \
  -o /dev/null -w "Status: %{http_code}, Time: %{time_total}s\n"

Extract the trace ID from the response headers:

bash
grep -i traceparent /tmp/perf-headers.txt
# Format: 00-{traceId}-{spanId}-{flags}

If no specific endpoint was given, list recent traces and pick the slowest:

mcp__aspire__list_traces  resourceName: "api"

Phase 3: Analyze Trace

Drill into the trace to see all spans:

mcp__aspire__list_trace_structured_logs  traceId: "<trace-id>"

Count and categorize the spans. See trace-patterns.md for the pattern reference.

Key metrics to extract:

  • Total span count
  • Total duration
  • Number of storage reads (blob GET/HEAD operations)
  • Number of unique aggregates loaded
  • Number of projection reads

Phase 4: Diagnose

Map spans back to code. Common patterns to look for:

Span pattern Diagnosis Fix
3 spans per aggregate (HEAD + GET doc + GET events) Aggregate rehydration Use projection if only reading
Same aggregate loaded multiple times Duplicate rehydration Cache or restructure the call chain
30+ spans for a single request N+1 — loading aggregates in a loop Replace with projection or batch query
Many GetAll* or GetBy* factory calls Iterating all streams Add a projection with an index
2 spans (HEAD + GET on projections/*.json) Projection read (efficient) This is good — no action needed
1 span (GET tags/document/*.json) Tag-based lookup (efficient) This is good — no action needed

Read the relevant endpoint code to confirm which calls produce the excess spans.

Phase 5: Recommend

Present findings to the user:

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS — {endpoint}
==================================

Request:    {method} {url}
Duration:   {time}s
Spans:      {count} ({breakdown})

Diagnosis:
  {description of the bottleneck}

Bottleneck Code:
  {file}:{line} — {description of the problematic call}

Recommendation:
  {specific fix — e.g., "Replace factory.GetByXAsync() with projection lookup"}

Expected Improvement:
  Spans: {current} → ~{expected}
  Reason: {why this reduces spans}

Phase 6: Verify Fix (if user applies the fix)

After code changes:

  1. Restart the resource:

    mcp__aspire__execute_resource_command  resourceName: "api"  commandName: "resource-restart"
    
  2. Wait for healthy state, then re-exercise the same endpoint (Phase 2)

  3. Pull the new trace and compare:

    Before: {X} spans, {Y}s
    After:  {X} spans, {Y}s
    Improvement: {reduction}
    
  4. If spans are still high, repeat from Phase 3.

Flags

Flag Behavior
(no flag) Full profiling workflow — trace, analyze, recommend
--compare Re-run a previous trace comparison after a fix

Supporting Files

  • trace-patterns.md — Detailed span pattern reference for event sourcing projects

Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.

Didn't find tool you were looking for?

Be as detailed as possible for better results