Agent skill
dev-handoff
This skill should be used when the user asks to 'pause work', 'hand off session', 'save progress', 'create handoff', or when context is running low and work needs to continue in a new session.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/edwinhu/workflows/tree/main/skills/dev-handoff
SKILL.md
Announce: "Using dev-handoff to capture session state for clean resumption."
Load shared enforcement:
Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../references/constraints/dev-common-constraints.md.
Contents
- The Iron Law of Handoff
- Red Flags - STOP Immediately
- Process
- Handoff Template
- Drive-Aligned Framing
Session Handoff
Capture current workflow state into .planning/HANDOFF.md so a fresh session can resume exactly where this one left off. Adapted from GSD's pause-work pattern.
NO HANDOFF WITHOUT READING CURRENT STATE FIRST. This is not negotiable.
Before writing .planning/HANDOFF.md, you MUST:
- READ
.planning/SPEC.md(if exists) — understand the requirements - READ
.planning/PLAN.md(if exists) — understand task breakdown and progress - READ
.planning/ACTIVE_WORKFLOW.md(if exists) — understand current phase - ASSESS what is actually done vs. what remains
- Only THEN write the handoff document
If you catch yourself writing a handoff without reading state files first, STOP. </EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
Red Flags - STOP Immediately If You Catch Yourself Thinking:
| Thought | Why It's Wrong | Do Instead |
|---|---|---|
| "I remember what we did" | Memory degrades across long sessions | READ the state files |
| "The handoff can be brief" | Brief handoffs lose critical context | Be thorough — the next session knows NOTHING |
| "I'll just note the current task" | Task number without context is useless | Include decisions, blockers, and next action |
| "We're almost done, no need for handoff" | "Almost done" is the most dangerous state to lose | Capture it — especially when close to completion |
| "The state files have everything" | State files track plan, not session context (decisions, discoveries, dead ends) | Add what's NOT in the files |
Process
Step 1: Read Current State
Read all available state files to understand where we are:
1. Read .planning/ACTIVE_WORKFLOW.md → current phase, workflow type
2. Read .planning/SPEC.md → requirements and success criteria
3. Read .planning/PLAN.md → task breakdown and approach
4. Scan recent git log → what's been committed
5. Check for uncommitted changes → what's in-flight
Run:
# Check workflow state
cat .planning/ACTIVE_WORKFLOW.md 2>/dev/null || echo "No active workflow"
# Check for uncommitted work
git status --short 2>/dev/null
# Recent commits in this session
git log --oneline -10 2>/dev/null
Description: dev-handoff: read current workflow and git state
Step 2: Assess Progress
From the state files and git history, determine:
- Current phase (from ACTIVE_WORKFLOW.md)
- Which tasks are complete (from git history and PLAN.md)
- Which task is in progress (from uncommitted changes)
- Decisions made during this session (from session context)
- Blockers encountered (from session context)
Step 3: Write Handoff Document
Write .planning/HANDOFF.md using the template below. Every field is mandatory.
Write as if briefing a colleague who has never seen this project. Include:
- The specific file you were editing and why
- The approach you chose and alternatives you rejected
- Any gotchas or surprises discovered during this session
- The EXACT next action (not "continue working" — what specifically to do first) </EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
Step 4: Verify Handoff
After writing, verify the handoff is complete:
1. IDENTIFY: .planning/HANDOFF.md exists
2. READ: Re-read the handoff document
3. VERIFY: Contains all sections (Current State, Completed Work, Remaining Work, Decisions, Next Action)
4. VERIFY: "Next Action" is specific enough to start immediately
5. VERIFY: Frontmatter phase/task match ACTIVE_WORKFLOW.md
If any section is empty or vague, fix it before confirming handoff.
Handoff Template
---
phase: [current phase number]
phase_name: [brainstorm|explore|clarify|design|implement|review|verify]
task: [current task number, 0 if between tasks]
total_tasks: [N from PLAN.md, 0 if no plan yet]
status: paused
last_updated: [ISO 8601 timestamp]
---
# Session Handoff
## Current State
[Where exactly we are — the immediate context a new session needs.
Include: current file being edited, current test being written,
current phase gate status. Be specific.]
## Completed Work
- [x] Task 1: [name] — Done ([brief note on what was done])
- [x] Task 2: [name] — Done
- [ ] Task 3: [name] — In progress ([what's done, what's not])
## Remaining Work
- Task 3: [what specifically remains]
- Task 4: [name] — Not started
- Task 5: [name] — Not started
## Decisions Made
- [Decision]: [what was decided and WHY]
- [Decision]: [what was decided and WHY]
## Rejected Approaches
- [Approach]: [why it was rejected — saves the next session from re-exploring dead ends]
## Blockers
- [Blocker]: [status/workaround found]
- (none) — if no blockers
## Uncommitted Changes
- [file]: [what was changed and why]
- (none) — if all work is committed
## Next Action
Start with: [specific first action when resuming — not "continue task 3" but
"run pytest tests/test_auth.py to verify the token refresh logic, then implement
the error handling in src/auth.py:45"]
Drive-Aligned Framing
When you write "continue working on task 3", you are:
- Forcing the next session to re-read all files to figure out where you were
- Losing decisions and context that took this session significant effort to build
- Creating a resumption that starts slower than a fresh start
A thorough handoff is the most helpful thing you can do when pausing. </EXTREMELY-IMPORTANT>
Rationalization Prevention
| Thought | Reality |
|---|---|
| "The state files capture everything" | State files don't capture session decisions, dead ends, or in-flight context |
| "I'll just note the phase and task" | Phase + task number without context forces full re-discovery |
| "The handoff is good enough" | "Good enough" handoffs lose 30 minutes of the next session to re-orientation |
| "We can figure it out from git history" | Git history shows WHAT changed, not WHY or WHAT'S NEXT |
Why Skipping Hurts the Thing You Care About Most
| Your Drive | Why You Skip | What Actually Happens | The Drive You Failed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Helpfulness | "Quick handoff to unblock the user faster" | Next session wastes time re-discovering context | Anti-helpful |
| Efficiency | "Handoff is overhead, just save the files" | Lost context costs 10x the handoff time | Anti-efficient |
| Competence | "I captured the important parts" | You don't know what the next session will need | Incompetent |
Completion
Checkpoint type: human-verify (handoff completeness is machine-verifiable)
After writing and verifying .planning/HANDOFF.md:
Announce: "Session handoff saved to .planning/HANDOFF.md. Next session will detect it automatically and offer to resume."
Report to user:
Handoff saved:
- Phase: [phase_name]
- Task: [N] of [total]
- Next action: [one-line summary]
Resume by starting /dev in this project — it will detect the handoff.
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
audit-fix-loop
This skill should be used when the user asks to 'iteratively improve', 'audit and fix', 'hill-climb quality', 'grade and improve', 'score and fix', 'audit loop', 'quality loop', or needs structured iterative improvement of an artifact using scored independent audits. Also use when the user invokes a ralph loop for quality improvement rather than task completion.
ds-spec-reviewer
Internal skill used by ds-brainstorm at Phase 1 exit gate. Dispatches a reviewer subagent to verify SPEC.md completeness before planning. NOT user-facing.
pptx-render
Use when the user asks to "render pptx", "show pptx slide", "compare with pptx", "pptx to image", "export pptx slide", "original slide", "show me the original", "what does the pptx look like", or needs to extract a specific PPTX slide's content for visual comparison.
obsidian-organize
Organize Obsidian notes according to clawd's preferences. Use when user asks to "organize notes", "move notes to right folder", "clean up vault", "tidy vault", "file this note", or when creating new notes in the Obsidian vault. Also use when moving, renaming, or categorizing notes, or when the vault root has stray files.
dev-verify
This skill should be used when the user asks to 'verify completion', 'check that tests pass', 'confirm feature works', or REQUIRED Phase 7 of /dev workflow (final). Enforces fresh runtime evidence before claiming completion.
dev
This skill should be used when the user asks to 'start a feature', 'build a feature', 'implement a feature', 'develop', 'new feature', or needs the full 7-phase development workflow with TDD enforcement.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?