Agent skill
delivery-readiness-audit
Spot-check AC internal consistency and scan for pending revisions on delivery-ready stories. Activated by `/gaai-status --audit` as Section 5. Complements the standard status checks with depth checks that standard status skips for speed.
Install this agent skill to your Project
npx add-skill https://github.com/Fr-e-d/GAAI-framework/tree/main/.gaai/core/skills/cross/delivery-readiness-audit
Metadata
Additional technical details for this skill
- id
- SKILL-CRS-019
- tags
-
governance delivery-gate coherence
- track
- cross-cutting
- author
- gaai-framework
- status
- stable
- version
- 1.0
- category
- cross
- updated at
- 1771804800
SKILL.md
Delivery Readiness Audit
Purpose / When to Activate
Activate via /gaai-status --audit. This skill runs after the standard status sections (1–4) have already identified delivery-ready stories, memory staleness, and framework health.
This skill adds two depth checks that standard status skips for speed:
- AC internal consistency — catches missing columns, undeclared endpoints, broken cross-references within a story
- Pending revisions — catches deferred work flagged in backlog notes but not yet captured as stories
Process
1. AC internal consistency — spot-check READY stories
For each story identified as "ready to deliver" by Section 1:
- Open the story artefact file
- Build an inventory of all resources declared by schema/setup ACs: columns, tables, endpoints, queues, secrets, cron triggers
- Scan all other ACs for resources referenced but not in the inventory
- Flag any reference to a column, endpoint, queue, table, or resource that is not declared elsewhere in the same story
Example of what this catches:
- AC5 uses
orders.cancelled_atfor filtering, but AC4 (schema migration) doesn't list that column - AC7 references
users.api_tokenbut it's missing from the migration
Severity: CRITICAL if it would cause the Delivery Agent to produce incomplete code.
2. Pending revisions scan
Scan all backlog item notes fields for patterns indicating unresolved work:
Patterns to match:
- "will be revised", "pending revision", "needs review"
- "story to generate", "story E0xS0x to generate", "to be created"
- "TODO", "to replace", "to migrate", "needs update"
DEC-references followed by a pending action description
For each match:
- State the backlog item ID, the DEC reference (if any), and the pending action
- Check whether a corresponding story already exists in the backlog
- Flag as IMPORTANT if no story exists yet
3. Delivery verdict
Produce a summary:
- Count of stories truly ready (all deps met + ACs internally consistent)
- Count of issues by severity (CRITICAL / IMPORTANT / MINOR)
- Verdict: READY FOR DELIVERY (0 critical issues) or ISSUES TO RESOLVE FIRST (list critical issues)
For issues safe to correct (missing AC metadata, column alignment), list them as "auto-fixable" in the report. Discovery or the human decides whether to apply fixes — this skill reports only.
Output Format
### Section 5 — Delivery Readiness
**5a. AC Consistency (READY stories)**
| Story | Issue | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| E01S03 | AC5 uses `orders.cancelled_at` — missing from AC4 migration | CRITICAL |
Verdict: PASS | N issues found
**5b. Pending Revisions**
| Backlog Item | DEC | Pending Action | Story Exists? |
|---|---|---|---|
| E02S04 | DEC-{N} | auth middleware refactor to support RBAC | No |
**5c. Delivery Verdict**
N stories ready. M critical, K important issues.
READY FOR DELIVERY | ISSUES TO RESOLVE FIRST
Quality Checks
- Every finding references a specific story ID, AC number, and resource name
- No vague findings ("something might be wrong" is invalid)
- Severity is explicit: CRITICAL (blocks Delivery), IMPORTANT (should fix), MINOR (cosmetic)
- No false positives — only flag cross-references that are genuinely missing
- The report is additive to standard status — never repeats Sections 1–4
Non-Goals
This skill must NOT:
- Repeat checks already done by
/gaai-statusSections 1–4 (staleness, dependency graph, backlog counts) - Fix issues (report only — Discovery or human decides)
- Rewrite artefacts or memory
- Make prioritization decisions about delivery order
If an AC can't survive a cross-reference check, Delivery will produce broken code. Catch it here.
Recommended Agent Skills
Expand your agent's capabilities with these related and highly-rated skills.
ci-watch-and-fix
Watch GitHub Actions CI after PR creation, detect failures, extract logs, apply minimal fixes, and re-push — keeping the delivery session alive until CI resolves or escalating after 3 cycles. Activate immediately after gh pr create and before marking the story done.
qa-review
Validate that implemented code fully satisfies Story acceptance criteria, respects rules, and introduces no regressions. This is the hard quality gate — no pass means no delivery. Activate after implementation is complete.
compose-team
Assemble the context bundles for each sub-agent based on evaluate-story output. Produces spawn-ready packages for Planning, Implementation, QA, or MicroDelivery sub-agents. Activate after evaluate-story, before spawning any sub-agent.
coordinate-handoffs
Validate sub-agent handoff artefacts, sequence phase transitions, and manage retry and escalation logic. Activate after each sub-agent terminates to determine next action.
implement
Generate correct, minimal, maintainable code that satisfies a validated Story's acceptance criteria against an execution plan. Activate when a Story is validated, a plan exists, and all prerequisites are unambiguous.
delivery-high-level-plan
Transform validated Stories into a clear, minimal, governed execution plan. Used by the Planning Sub-Agent as the first planning pass before prepare-execution-plan for Tier 2/3, or as the sole planning output for simple Stories.
Didn't find tool you were looking for?